Facebook Is The Ant; Zynga Is The Grasshopper

http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/11/facebook-is-the-ant-zynga-is-the-grasshopper/

by kunle • 14 years ago

51 22 14 years ago

naeem• 14 years ago

And yet Mark Pincus is a multi-millionaire and a massive Valley success story. Not to mention the last guy that had Zuckerbeg's "zeal" and lived in a humble house died recently, and was known for being an unbearable dick to his employees.

It's usually a big can of worms to judge an entrepreneur by anything other than his success. Besides -- what is so wrong about Pincus wanting to get rich?

saraid2163• 14 years ago

> Not to mention the last guy that had Zuckerbeg's "zeal" and lived in a humble house died recently, and was known for being an unbearable dick to his employees.

The article cites several examples of CEOs with similar "zeal", none of whom are dead, and none of whom are known for being unbearable dicks.

kqr2• 14 years ago

I think he is referring to Steve Jobs.

bryanlarsen• 14 years ago

We judge an entrepreneur by what he has built. You can get rich by "extracting rents" or you can get rich by building something that makes the world so much better that people fall all over themselves trying to give you money for it.

dasil003• 14 years ago

It's a big can of worms to judge anyone for any reason. However I am comfortable judging Pincus because I think Zynga is a flaming pile of shit that feeds off human weakness and is a blight on humanity. The fact that he would try to steal back shares from his employees is just the cherry on top.

jfaucett• 14 years ago

really "a can of worms to judge by anything but success"? What about the Samwer brothers or some of gates dubious tactics? The Samwers just rip ideas to get rich, and I think we can agree there is a bit of a difference in an entrepreneur like Jobs who was innovative and pushed his field to new levels and one like gates who built a monopoly by rather unethical means...

joelrunyon• 14 years ago

You're also assuming the metric for success = money, which while that may be your barometer for success, you should be wary about assuming that's other people's metrics as well.

michaelochurch3• 14 years ago

Q: What's better than being a multimillionaire?

A: Not being Mark Pincus.

option_greek• 14 years ago

If the stories of how bad zynga is to its employees keep pouring out, "Stop being a pincus" might even become mainstream.

wpietri• 14 years ago

Nothing is wrong with wanting to get rich. But there's a lot wrong with wanting to get rich no matter how it harms other people.

Also, I'm not sure I'd call him a Valley success story. Zynga is company number 4. The last three all made him some money without going anywhere. Like the article's author, I think Zynga is on the same path to long-term irrelevance.

Few in the Valley look back on the wreckage of Bubble 1.0 and think of those companies as success stories, however much they enriched their founders.

pxlpshr• 14 years ago

If you're referring to Jobs as the last guy that had "Zuck's zeal", you need to get to get a reality check.

Jobs built multiple multi-billion dollar companies that redefined innovation. He (and his team) created the personal computer market, transformed it again 20 years later, transformed telecom 'overnight' while slaying RIM and Nokia with one swoop, and in many regards — introduced new childhood memories that will not be forgotten for decades, like Snow White's glass slipper. The MySpace abomination barely left a wrinkle in history's culture.

I'm not one to hate on entrepreneurs but Zuck has a long way to go. I feel like there needs to be a history book for new entrepreneurs who think the glorified web startup guys are Gods among men. Most of the Gods aren't socializing at this weeks Startup FunFunFun HappyHour Fest 5000.

thenomad2• 14 years ago

"A great poker player demonstrates commitment by going “All In”."

This is a minor point, but given I live with a very serious poker player, I've started to twitch about poker misunderstandings.

Going all-in is not a rare event - at least not in no-limit Holdem, which is the game most people think of as "poker". Nor is it limited to the "great" poker players - in fact, it's one of the more basic and more common strategies, otherwise known as "shoving", to intimidate others out of a pot or for half a dozen reasons.

I know there are probably a lot of people on HN with more poker knowledge than me, so I'll shut up now (and wait for the inevitable discovery, possibly from my SO, that I've got the entire concept backward) - but it just irked me.

jcc802• 14 years ago

I read it just as a sort of throw away line in the article. But you're right, going all in isn't rare. In tournament play when your stack size is below certain thresholds & you're in certain positions relative to the blinds [1] going all in is the proper play to make 100% of the time, so it's quite common.

For cash games, which most people are less familiar with, going all in is still generally based more in math than "commitment" or being a man. If the way you've played a hand gives you a certain range, you can estimate what bet sizes your opponent thinks he can profitably call. Beyond the psychology, going all in is just a means to make your opponent commit a math error, that long-term would be an unprofitable course of action.

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-ratio -though this is a very generic explanation that doesn't go into position.

saraid2163• 14 years ago

But his point wasn't about the rarity of the action; commitment doesn't have to be rare. It does have to be demonstrated and that demonstration is a meaningful gesture that signals other players. That's his point: that commitment needs to be seen.

michaelochurch3• 14 years ago

Actually, the proper metaphor is that Zynga is Facebook's tapeworm.

nhangen• 14 years ago

I think this is a neat article, but guilty of over-analysis.

Perhaps Zuck takes his mission too seriously, and Pincus doesn't take his seriously enough. Or perhaps Pincus is smart enough to cash out while he can.

Either way, entrepreneurs approach business differently from each other. Nothing extraordinary about that.

Tooluka• 14 years ago

The fundamentals of Facebook’s business – even when it was working perfectly – are to ensure a steady stream of new users (often via M&A), to grease the user acquisition machine via advertising on just about everywhere, and to incent users to rope in their friends. This strategy depends on playing with copious amounts of capital to buy companies, ads, and promotions.

And this - "Facebook’s mission – to make the world more open and connected" is just hilarious (forgive me Louis :) ).

code51• 14 years ago

"Mark Zuckerberg truly believes that Facebook’s mission – to make the world more open and connected – is the biggest and most important in Silicon Valley."

open and connected. and definitely more like Las Vegas...

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19162971

Facebook Is The Ant; Zynga Is The Grasshopper

Related Stories