Number 3 Startup Hub?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43195

by far33d • 19 years ago

15 53 19 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

So it's pretty obvious that the Bay Area is startup hub #1, and Boston is #2, but what is #3?

New York? Boulder? Chicago? Seattle?

Follow-up question - what cities that are not the top three seem to have the most potential to become #3?

ivankirigin2• 19 years ago

Seattle, I'm told.

pg2• 19 years ago

Yes, probably Seattle, or maybe Austin.

far33d5• 19 years ago

Austin. I didn't even think of that. Who's the catalyst there?

mattculbreth• 19 years ago

I'm hoping for Atlanta to your second question. Quite sure it's not #3 now but there's a few of us working on it.

run4yourlives2• 19 years ago

Too US Centric no?

Canada has got some pretty interesting startup scenes, Vancouver, Waterloo area and Ottawa come to mind.

And Europe is certainly not to be forgotten about, let alone India as well.

I'd be interested to see how things compare globally, although I think you've got 1 and 2 pegged.

comatose_kid2• 19 years ago

What's in Ottawa? (I grew up there)...

run4yourlives2• 19 years ago

there's a few ror things happening there, the guys behind shopify I think.

electric• 19 years ago

"What's in Ottawa?"

A lot of non-Web2.0 stuff. Like wireless, telecom, computing, etc.

far33d5• 19 years ago

I'm not sure that there's a non-US city that is a contender for #3....

falsestprophet3• 19 years ago

Montreal?

samb2• 19 years ago

it's not chicago, but it should be.

rrival4• 19 years ago

What's the story with Chicago. You'd think with 37signals, feedburner and ... I can't think of a prominent 3rd, you'd get a local startup community slightly more active than TechCocktail...

bmaier4• 19 years ago

Chicago is just getting close to reaching critical mass. The startups that succeeded here before did little to foster community. The startups here now are coming around to the idea of a start up community. It should be interesting to see how it plays out. The other problem here is that a bunch of the good hackers go to places like Citadel rather than do a startup.

far33d5• 19 years ago

Threadless is the third.

pg2• 19 years ago

One YC-funded startup is there: Inkling Markets.

http://inklingmarkets.blogspot.com/2007/06/inkling-is-hiring...

adrianh2• 19 years ago

Chicago's the best. You can live within walking distance of world-class restaurants, great music venues, convenient public transportation and the most breathtaking architecture in America -- all for a fraction of the cost of living you'd find in San Francisco, New York, Boston or DC.

Then there's the demographic breakdown. If I'm building a Web application that I intend to market to normal people -- i.e., NOT the types of people who read 96 RSS feeds a day and obsess over TechCrunch -- I'd rather live in a place where my friends are, well, diverse. Chicago has a strong economy with no clear dominating industry. There's strength in diversity.

Not that there isn't a tech scene here. The Tech Cocktail events (semi-regular gatherings of 500+ local tech people) have been well-attended, and the Chicago Python Users Group is a great bunch of people. During a recent Chicago visit, a Bay Area resident told me he was astounded by how much more active the Chicago Python group was than the Bay Area one.

I have very little experience raising startup money, so I can't comment about the availability of VC or angel funding in Chicago. But are you really going to move somewhere just to get funding? What does it say about the quality of your idea if you feel like it will only succeed if you live in a certain part of the U.S.?

menloparkbum2• 19 years ago

I'm originally from Chicago. Chicago is great in some ways, but the attitudes of most business people (including those in "tech") are straight out of the 1950s.

rabpdx• 19 years ago

Portland, OR

ahsonwardak• 19 years ago

I would hope that it would be DC, but it's probably not. If we're talking about web startups. Could it be NYC?

mangodrunk• 19 years ago

DC is for enterprise Java programmers and only big government contractors. I think the general job market in DC is ranked #1 though.

oditogre• 19 years ago

Re: Boulder: Why not Fort Collins? Close to Denver, beautiful area, nice weather, college town, and - more than anything else - the place is just loaded with young people, and local businesses seem geared towards a younger market more so than most any place I can think of.

ciderdude• 19 years ago

I'm thinking of moving to Boulder from Silicon Valley (Palo Alto) simply because the cost of doing business is so insanely high here. My apartment rent has gone up $1200 over the past 5 years, the traffic sucks, taxes are high, wages are inflated, and we don't need to raise capital.

There are ways to deal with these factors (BART, biking to work, cooking at home, handing out equity in lieu of cash, etc...). But, why bother when there are more affordable places to do business in the U.S.?

I'm looking for a place in the U.S. that meets three criteria: (1) a great year-round outdoor lifestyle with lots of hiking trails, mountain biking terrain, and possibly rock-climbing and/or skiing (2) young, smart people (3) affordable living (rental prices, food prices, traffic) (4) a nearby university with a top-40 School of Engineering (5) not a resort/retirement community

Right now I'm looking at Ventura, CA (ocean sports are a good substitute for moutain sports), Boulder, or Bozeman Montanta. Neither Ventura nor Boulder are "cheap", but they are a bargain compared to Palo Alto. Ventura is within 40min of UCSB (Santa Barbara is too expensive) and Boulder is obviously a college town.

We're keeping our servers in a Bay Area datacenter, but there really is no reason to stay here since our company is profitable and cash-flow positive (an algorithmic hedge fund specializing in OTC energy derivatives).

I've never been to Fort Collins. How does it compare with Boulder?

There is no reason to be in Silicon Valley if your company is profitable, cash-flow positive, and self-financing. If not, then Silicon Valley is a superb place to raise capital; however, be prepared to pay dearly for it (both in equity and in cost of doing business).

Thanks!

far33d5• 19 years ago

There's one reason if you are profitable..

Hiring.

enkrates• 19 years ago

As a Colorado resident, let me say that I'm pretty sure you'd be very happy in Boulder. According to USNEWS, CU-Boulder is #40 SoE. The other 4 criteria you have describe Boulder very accurately.

As for Fort Collins, I haven't been there much, but it is definitely geographically much more "out there" than Boulder. I think FC is about 60 miles north of Denver, while Boulder is about 25 miles northwest. The 25 miles between Denver and Boulder are pretty built up, at least by Colorado standards, while the drive to Fort Collins from Denver is pretty desolate.

Boulder is a bit more expensive than Fort Collins, but coming from the Bay Area, I'm not sure you'd notice much. It's all mighty cheap on the Front Range compared to anywhere near coastal CA cities.

rrival4• 19 years ago

I lived in Boulder from 2002 to 2005. I spent 2 months in Boulder this summer trying to figure out if it's the place to be. I love it. I love the quality of life. I love the relaxed atmosphere, the perfect weather & proximity to skiing. TechStars is there, Boulder OpenCoffee Club is active and there is some VC, as far as I can tell. There's a decent pool of relatively cheap talent in the Denver/Boulder area, CU has a reasonably well regarded engineering school, Sun and IBM have campuses there. StartupWeekend was born there.

I couldn't find the energy. The pace is an opiate. I couldn't find the noise. I couldn't find the 20-somethings actively changing things in tech; it seems like if you have any drive there, you leave. The vibe is bohemian (it's Boulder), and part of me would love to, as pg commented, move 10,000 geeks there and give a $500m endowment to CU to try to architect a new SV in the Rockies, but it's missing something. It seems like the scales are tipped 75/25 between play/work.

Please prove me wrong. I'd be there next week if I thought the startup infrastructure (developers, investors, etc) was active enough.

rickcecil• 19 years ago

Thought about Research Triangle Park in North Carolina? Got Duke University, UNC Chapel Hill, and NC State close by. Close to the beach, the mountains. Weather is great, though it does get pretty muggy in the summer. And the cost of living is reasonable. And it has a strong entrepreneurial community (cednc.org). It's certainly not a huge city, but it's got a lot going for it...though, it would mean moving to the east coast.

falsestprophet3• 19 years ago

Sorry, Top 40 engineering means nothing.

epi0Bauqu• 19 years ago

What metric do you think one should use to do the ranking? Absolute # of startups? Size of VC investment? Biggest nerd community?

far33d5• 19 years ago

Whatever metric you want. By whatever metric that everyone agrees that the bay area and boston are 1 and 2.

dpapathanasiou• 19 years ago

No, not NYC... most hackers are paid too well by i-banks and hedge funds to risk joining a startup, and those startup founders who do succeed don't stay here to become angels (as they do in SV and other startup hubs).

portLAN• 19 years ago

You're in luck -- the last version of YC news on archive.org had it!

http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/04/04/where-are-the-tech-st...

The O'Reilly Radar post is here: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/startup_centers.ht...

The numbers are a year old but Seattle was #3 and NYC was #4. Although Tacoma is grouped in with Seattle, I'm not sure how meaningful that is -- it's kind of like grouping Oakland with Mountain View.

rmason• 19 years ago

Seattle, followed by Austin and then Ann Arbor and Madison in a tie for fifth

menloparkbum2• 19 years ago

There is no #3. Boston is WAY behind the Bay Area, even though die-hard Bostonians (er... I mean Cantabrigians) like to believe otherwise.

If you don't feel that the Bay Area offers any advantage to your startup, you could probably be based almost anywhere.

danw2• 19 years ago

London?

danw2• 19 years ago

My reasoning for London:

Lots of Big Co's have offices here such as Google, Yahoo, BBC, Skype, etc

Lots of great startups: Last.fm, Moo, Crowdstorm, Mind Candy, Gottabet, etc

Some great universities: Imperial, RCA, near to Oxford & Cambridge

Good VCs: Index Ventures, Accel, Atlas plus Seedcamp

Plenty of events: Ranging from weekly openCoffee's to big barcamps and Hackday and conferences like Future of Web Apps. Last nights Facebook Developer Garage pulled in 200 or so.

dotcoma• 19 years ago

Seattle is probably number 2, isn't it?

Number 3 Startup Hub?

Related Stories