Honeybee: Calling via XMPP

https://momi.ca/posts/2024-10-09-honeybee.html

by zaik • 2 years ago

76 17 2 years ago

hales• 2 years ago

All of the linked XMPP-phonenetwork bridging services appear to be United States + Canada only, so I have no hope of trying or testing this software.

The best I have in my country (Australia) are SIP providers. They generally only offer landline numbers; I think some might offer mobile numbers but I have not tried those services (they cost more and I suspect texting won't work anyway).

Nonetheless some simple self-hosted SIP-XMPP bridge software would be amazing. We'd also need XMPP clients that understand this, however, otherwise using existing tel://xxx address books would be fiddly (you would have to manually retype them to be an XMPP address).

N.B. SIP clients on phones seem to be a bit slow and unreliable. I use one daily nonetheless, along with Snikket (conversations), which also has its fair share of issues on different people's phones.

jeroenhd• 2 years ago

I haven't tried it myself (I don't even run an XMPP server anymore) but based on the description, combining something like sylkserver[1], perhaps with a dedicated SIP service (Asterisk/FreePBX?), should get you VoIP phone calls from XMPP. You can probably get one of those SIM-to-SIP devices (or maybe there's software) if you want mobile phone calls.

There's one problem with this setup: emergency numbers may not work and might get routed to the wrong place.

[1] https://github.com/AGProjects/sylkserver

prmoustache• 2 years ago

There is another major problem which is latency. I hate it when someone decides to call me using whatsapp by convenience (the phone/call button is easy to reach right on top of the message view) because latency is way too high which means people keep speaking at the same time unless you use it like a walkie-talkie and say "over" when you clean the line.

I know the latency is already a thing with regular wireless phone network and we will probably never get back to analog wired level but it is still much lower than the latency the instant messaging apps call have, which is just too much to be bearable for anything else but the very occasional call.

singpolyma3• 2 years ago

https://blog.jmp.chat/b/mobile-friendly-sip-gateway

usr11062• 2 years ago

I am not actively following this field, but I had somehow gotten the impression XMPP is a dying protocol. Any opinions on that?

I have also looked for VoIP providers offering competitive per minute rates to European phone numbers with no monthly fee. I did not find much. VoIP seems to be somewhat popular in Germany and there is no lack of providers. But their contracts include a German phone number which I don't need and cannot even legally get because I don't live there. I don't think SIP vs XMPP would matter for me.

pabs32• 2 years ago

For me I had XMPP accounts with zero usage until the Freenode IRC network imploded, then a few channels moved to XMPP and I joined a couple more. That said, IRC is still more active than XMPP for me.

doughecka• 2 years ago

Wait, what happened to freenode?

zaik• 2 years ago

IETF Standards don't get a large marketing budget assigned to them like many other messengers have, but there are quite a few community projects which are actively developed. Off the top of my head there is Conversations on Android (gratis when you get it from F-Droid), Monal on iOS, Gajim on the desktop, Dino, Movim, Profanity, converse.js, Prosody, ejabberd, ...

bertman• 2 years ago

but I had somehow gotten the impression XMPP is a dying protocol. Any opinions on that?

Not at all. Have a look at https://snikket.org for example. This let's you set up your own XMPP server that "just works" in a couple of minutes, and then you can hand out invites to your friends and family, so that they can install the Snikket app (Android or iOS) and are automatically registered and in your contacts in a few taps, without them even needing to know what XMPP is.

The server is the well-known Prosody, dockerized, the Android app is a re-skinned Conversations, the iOS client is based on Siskin IM.

And just like that you have a working, private, self-hosted, end-to-end encrypted cross-platform messaging system that also support a/v calls out of the box.

It really is pretty cool.

_chu1• 2 years ago

It pretty much is. You will find that barely anyone actively uses XMPP, let alone anyone you know.

hot_gril• 2 years ago

Yeah. I used to work with it a lot. It basically has similar problems as email but without the momentum. It's complicated to run an XMPP server that actually has all the features you'd want, including properly configured C2S and S2S auth, and even then you're missing important client-side features unless you get clients in agreement (see: iChat).

Imo they needed to be stricter about what constitutes a standard XMPP server, especially with security-related stuff. Look at how browsers managed to ban old TLS versions and discourage plain HTTP.

And less important but just annoying, XML was a mistake that they keep defending. Really only made sense for rich text message body, which nowadays nobody cares about either. I've seen a project where they just shoved JSON into it and called it a day.

pabs32• 2 years ago

For the phone network part of this you can use JMP from Singpolyma:

https://jmp.chat/ https://singpolyma.net/

usr11062• 2 years ago

JMP seems to give you a number for incoming. I have no need for that, I would need outgoing into the European phone network.

Edit: Calling to German landlines is $0.015 / min. That's a competitive price as such. But the monthly fee doesn't make it overly interesting for my usage pattern.

Coolbeanstoo• 2 years ago

Id like something like jmp.chat but self hosted, there are a good few USB modems that would let me do this, just all the software makes use of hosted phone number providers.

rijoja• 2 years ago

Could you please tell us which ones?

Honeybee: Calling via XMPP

Related Stories