Deadhorse UFO Incident: NORAD Logs Reveal Insights into Object's Countermeasures

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/deadhorse-ufo-incident-norad-logs-reveal-insights-into-potential-defense-systems

by keepamovin • 2 years ago

18 17 2 years ago

1970-01-01• 2 years ago

Absolutely no evidence to suggest linking the power failure to the incident. Did I miss anything?

keepamovin7• 2 years ago

To the contrary: it is suggestive but you couldn't say it's definitive. The redactions prevent making a conclusion either way, right now. Unfortunately, I suppose.

admjs• 2 years ago

Occams razor idea -- state actor spy balloon/drone + state actor hackers inside the power system?

smallmouth• 2 years ago

Speaking from personal experience, occam's razor goes straight out the window when one sees one of these things up close.

Anyway, Robert Hastings has written and researched extensively on this very phenomenon.

grahamj• 2 years ago

yeah I'm thinking planes and hacks

keepamovin7• 2 years ago

probably NORAD with all their sensors hasn't been able to invalidate that idea. hahaha! :)

steve1977• 2 years ago

My thoughts as well.

„Could these so-called UAP “countermeasures”, deployed over thousands of miles with pin-point accuracy be the real reason for government non-disclosure?“

Could the infiltration of defense systems by an adversary not be as good a reason?

doctor_radium• 2 years ago

Skimmed the article and it seemed like a lot of speculation and redacted military communications. From Wikipedia:

On February 16, 2023, US President Joe Biden stated that the downed object was probably a civilian-owned balloon and "most likely tied to private companies, recreation or research institutions".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Alaska_high-altitude_ob...

beefnugs• 2 years ago

Yeah fun to read, but jesus "redacted in full: perhaps <insane made up bullshit>" every second entry

keepamovin7• 2 years ago

Insane made up bullshit seems a bit of stretch when NORAD gave it a UAP designator.

keepamovin7• 2 years ago

We need to put more stock in a FOIA release of internal NORAD logs, than WH public statements, here. You wouldn't say?

viraptor2• 2 years ago

orders the facility remain on emergency diesel generation power until after the UAP20 intercept mission is completed. This is a very odd command to give

Since when is "we've got enough fuel, let's deal with one issue at a time" an odd command?

Line 39: A rather lengthy log entry by WO Roberts, possibly describing the countermeasures the UAP deployed against the Raptors that were reported by the pilots involved. Redacted in full.

Holy baseless speculation, Batman!

keepamovin7• 2 years ago

Or not "baseless" on the assumption the power fluctuations are both: unusual (for the power-hardened facility it is clearly stated at the start); and coincident with the shootdown.

I don't think "we've the fuel, one at a time" is odd, but that's not the oddness that's inferred there.

It's odd because that facility should be experiencing those issues, and those issues should not be somehow linked to an op. Multiple ways to read, but I think's obvious. Also more fun! hahaha :)

viraptor2• 2 years ago

That specific line was baseless speculation. There's nothing to suggest countermeasures at that point and the whole line is redacted.

for the power-hardened facility it is clearly stated at the start

I'm not sure that's as relevant as the page implies. We'd have to know the exact procedures, but having a site with multiple power sources and protections doesn't mean the switching system can never fail. If you have 2 failures in a short time, the best course of action is very likely "stop touching that thing until someone qualified figures out what's going wrong".

Deadhorse UFO Incident: NORAD Logs Reveal Insights into Object's Countermeasures

Related Stories