Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans

https://postgres.heroku.com/blog/past/2012/5/3/crane_the_new_50_per_month_production_database_/

by michaelfairley • 14 years ago

105 62 14 years ago

postgres.heroku.com

7952• 14 years ago

That's with 1TB of storage!

killion• 14 years ago

So if the plans are named after increasingly deadly things the crane is the least deadly? I guess I could see that.

velominati• 14 years ago

That's right. They are all Japanese things in increasing order of deadliness.

Danieru• 14 years ago

I was curious and the list did not disappoint: https://postgres.heroku.com/pricing

With that said I'm not sure how squid managed to be more dangerous than a kappa. >Kappa are usually seen as mischievous troublemakers. Their pranks range from the relatively innocent, such as loudly passing gas or looking up women's kimonos, to the malevolent, such as drowning people and animals, kidnapping children, and raping women

~wikipedia

dmishe• 14 years ago

1tb and backups are nice for $50, i wish them all the best to grow and drop price more

RexM• 14 years ago

I was just thinking yesterday that their lowest $200/month dedicated plan seemed like such a leap from their 20GB $15/month shared plan.

mml• 14 years ago

2 weeks ago, i was seriously considering moving off of heroku to roll my own hstore support. Perfect timing.

salimmadjd• 14 years ago

Heroku is really great to get your started if you don't want to worry about managing infrastructure. However, you're paying a major premium for that and you need to have an exit plan from the beginning incase you grow too big and the costs no longer make sense.

aculver2• 14 years ago

I agree with everything you said, except that I don't think you need to spend any time working on an exit plan until the day you realize you're paying "too much" (whatever that means to you) for the benefit you're receiving from their managed hosting. I recommend: Launch on Heroku. Reevaluate that choice on success.

Estragon2• 14 years ago

Surely designing with the eventual migration in mind will reduce the pain in the end, though.

easp2• 14 years ago

I agree.

Think about what "too much" Heroku spend is. Think about what level of adoption/success it will take to reach that much Heroku spend. Then consider if you actually get to that level of adoption, are your Heroku costs really going to be "too much?" Don't spend more than 90 minutes on the whole exercise.

My guess is that, for most apps, worrying before launch about migrating off of Heroku is a premature optimization.

fdr• 14 years ago

What Heroku features, products, or enforced architectural choices (like no permanent disk on the spawned processes) do you see as causing lock-in that you would plan around avoiding or taking into consideration for a migration off Heroku?

ConstantineXVI• 14 years ago

Tried to set up a dev database from the dashboard; got a generic fail message. Told me why when I tried to add it from the CLI (my acct wasn't verified), may want to make this clear on the dashboard as well.

freeformz7• 14 years ago

This should be fixed now.

mshafrir• 14 years ago

Will be interesting to see what Heroku ends up rolling out for the higher-priced dev database (comparable to the current 20 GB plan).

100k2• 14 years ago

They've said they'll release something "at a comparable price point" to the $15/month shared plan. Hopefully the $50/month database isn't it as that seems high for hobby projects that outgrow the small dev database.

pvh5• 14 years ago

Crane is not intended to be the plan that will fill the role of the existing $15/mo database. We're still working on that one.

Timothee• 14 years ago

Very cool. I've been looking at spatial databases and the fact that I could get MongoDB running on a free plan (e.g. with MongoLab and MongoHQ) made me go that way. (for now)

PostGIS has been available on Heroku's dedicated DBs (https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/is-postgis-available), but the $200/month was a bit high for early stage. $50 is much more manageable and I might be looking towards Postgres + PostGIS in the future… (assuming that the linked post also applies to these new plans)

freeformz7• 14 years ago

For now PostGIS is not available on the new crane/kappa plans....

samstokes• 14 years ago

Congrats to the Heroku DoD on launching this long-awaited price point!

Can we create Crane followers of a larger master database yet? That would be really useful - keeping a cheap, eventually-consistent replica around for backup and analytics.

freeformz7• 14 years ago

If you are on an older ronin or fugu you can't. But you can from all other plans and newer ronin/fugu databases. The limitation on older ronin/fugu databases is related to: https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog-items/37

tomfakes4• 14 years ago

I really like this!

I'm building an app that will eventually use hstore for data. I say 'eventually', because I'm currently using serialized columns on the $15/month shared plan, and hstore is not yet supported.

At $50/month, this is cheap enough for me to use as a staging server or as a pre-release server to get hstore across my entire environment.

freeformz7• 14 years ago

Then new dev plans support hstore: https://postgres.heroku.com/blog/past/2012/4/26/heroku_postg...

tomfakes4• 14 years ago

I need a bit more than the approx 5MB of data - much more, but currently less than 20GB.

I'm kind of in a no-mans land of Heroku data plans - until today!

japhyr• 14 years ago

Can somebody clarify which heroku plans are best, as you work from development through MVP and initial traction? My current understanding is:

Development Stage: Use the free plan.

MVP Stage: When I have an MVP that I'd like to show people and get feedback on, I'm not sure if I should stay with the free plan, or if I need a paid plan at this point.

Gaining Traction: Still low overall volume, but consistent users. What is the cheapest paid plan that works for this stage? Is it the $15 plan, or the $50 plan?

Increasing Traffic: At this point, it's a little more clear that you choose add-ons to match your specific needs.

I would love it if someone could clarify what kinds of loads each of these plans could reasonably be expected to handle.

tomblomfield• 14 years ago

The answer to this depends on such a variety of factors that it's impossible to give a useful answer.

Use something like New Relic to watch your app's performance. If it's exceeding tolerable limits, you need to change something. This might be a re-write of your code to reduce load, or pouring more resource into dynos, workers, database or caching.

marcelfahle• 14 years ago

Damn, this is nice! Thanks Heroku! I love the service, but 200 bucks as the lowest price point for a dedicated db didn't always make sense to me, especially in the startup world. This changes everything.

erikpukinskis• 14 years ago

For anyone looking to upgrade from the shared database to one of these, I believe this is the procedure:

https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/migrating-data-between...

shaggyfrog• 14 years ago

If anyone from Heroku is reading, that page is a great example of how poor contrast results in poor readability. Blue-on-blue text makes me close the browser tab, and not actually see what you're trying to sell.

pvh5• 14 years ago

Many of us are reading. We'll look into increasing the contrast.

lucian1900• 14 years ago

But please don't lay down the torch of dark backgrounds :)

iamrok2• 14 years ago

Heroku is my Apple for Dev staff.

artellectual• 14 years ago

This is awesome, been waiting for this.

marshallp• 14 years ago

Azure SQL is only $10 per month for 1GB. Why is heroku so ridiculously more expensive than them.

michaelfairley• 14 years ago

Heroku is $15 for 20GB.

pvh5• 14 years ago

Heroku doesn't charge for storage. Our pricing model is based on the amount of data you can have cached in memory.

treelovinhippie2• 14 years ago

Still wish they would offer included mySQL (yes postgreSQL has advantages, but it's a pain in the arse to work with)

pvh5• 14 years ago

If the problems you're talking about are installation related (and you're on a Mac), we've got your back: http://postgresapp.com

treelovinhippie2• 14 years ago

Nope, not on a Mac (fucking hate it that there are numerous apps for hackers now that are only made for Mac). This was my first time building a facebook app, playing with cloud hosting and using postgresql so the entire installation and use was complicated. I would have thought that since Facebook is encouraging you guys as the preferred/primary/sponsored cloud host that you'd provide a database that most people are familiar with - mySQL.

I ended up going with the clearDB addon just to save learning time, but at $10pm for only 1GB it's definitely a worse plan than the $15pm 20GB postgresql database you offer.

jstin• 14 years ago

Heroku sells convenience, and resells EC2 instances to you. Their previous dedicated database option, Ronin, cost $200/month. When you connect the dots that this DB has a 1.7GB cache and that a small instance on EC2 has 1.7GB memory[1], you start to realize what you're really paying for.

While paying 3.3 times more[2] may be ok for the added simplicity, you have to wonder if your 'dedicated' database is really just a small instance on EC2? If it is a larger instance, then you are sharing it with other users.

However, even a small instance is far from not being shared. EC2 has performance issues, especially small instances. Disk IO is the worst.[3]

Disclaimer: These are all just my observations, and I don't how Heroku actually configure their Ronin databases. I'd love to be proven wrong, and to have someone from Heroku explain. But from personal experience with both EC2 and Heroku's Ronin database, if my conclusions are wrong, the results are not. I've seen very slow performance on the simplest of queries on both configurations.

[1] http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ [2] http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/ [3] http://www.frederico-araujo.com/2011/12/27/why-ec2-still-sux...

zokier• 14 years ago

I didn't think disk io matters all that much if you fit your data in memory, which afaik you should if you want any kind of decent performance.

markatto• 14 years ago

Even if your whole data set fits into main memory, writes still have to go to disk.

gdsf34dfsg• 14 years ago

How stable is the PostGIS beta? Anyone using it

pvh5• 14 years ago

Most of our beta-testers have been using it just fine. We had one unlucky soul who encountered several pernicious bugs over a long period, but at this point I think they're all sewn up.

jalanco2• 14 years ago

I tried to create a quick "dev" database but got "Cannot create database. Please try again later."

jalanco2• 14 years ago

Okay never mind. I had to verify my account to make it work.

Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans

Related Stories