When to Shut Up: A Visual Guide (With Included Algorithm)

https://shaungallagher.pressbin.com/blog/shut-up.html

by jawns • 3 years ago

126 35 3 years ago

shaungallagher.pressbin.com

Zhyl• 3 years ago

The top of the flowchart needs more options - there's a whole opinion golf world of trying to distill a point into as few sentences/syllables as possible,or trying to find a punchy way of summarising.

If you can say all you need to say about something with a terse and pithy throwaway comment, then you've found the hidden non-zero safezone.

asylteltine• 3 years ago

This will be useful next time I’m Jesus

jessmartin• 3 years ago

Stock up now on loaves and fish

bobwaycott• 3 years ago

Avoid the stocking problem with this one weird trick: accept a few from the crowd and multiply them—it also helps keep the crowd’s attention.

drewcoo• 3 years ago

Now do "when to stop writing."

ayx• 3 years ago

Yes

andai• 3 years ago

I heard that most books could be at least ten times slimmer, but then they wouldn't stand upright on the bookshelf.

TedDoesntTalk3• 3 years ago

See: any book by Stephen King

hu3• 3 years ago

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt"

m3kw9• 3 years ago

My flow chart consists of <STFU>? -> Yes

alephxyz• 3 years ago

Missing a "Has the audience been listening to other people talk for the last 90+ minutes?" condition

jader201• 3 years ago

This could almost be useful (I know it’s mostly j/k), but it really needs some multiplier or something for the size of the audience.

For example, if you’re speaking 1:n, the numbers should shoot way up as n approaches 1, and way down/zero out — particularly for some branches of the chart — as n approaches higher orders of magnitude (so using a log scale).

That is, you shouldn’t need to prepare a speech when you’re taking 1:1. And you likely shouldn’t be talking at all without preparation when speaking to, say, 100 or more (unless you’re not the speaker and you’re asking a question, for example).

anthomtb• 3 years ago

And you likely shouldn’t be talking at all without preparation when speaking to, say, 100 or more

I'm probably saying what you mean but preparation should mean (or include) practice. That is, if you're speaking to 100+ people, it better not be the first time anyone has heard your speech in its entirety. (source: once bombed a conference talk thinking I could "just wing it").

andsoitis• 3 years ago

Another heuristic is to ask yourself:

- does this have to be said

- does this have to be said now

- does this have to be said by me

chaboud• 3 years ago

I love this framework, but I learned a slightly different one from… Craig Ferguson? At a comedy show? Pretty sure…

The ordering I learned was:

- does this need to be said? - does this need to be said by me? - does this need to be said by me, now?

I find this construction particularly useful in the “lead/senior/principal/blame-sink” role, as I’m typically trying to get the team to come to a conclusion without my explicit direction. Once it gets to the “okay, this needs to be said by me, now” moment, I pull the trigger. Otherwise, I try to just nudge the team in the right direction, leaving folks feeling more ownership over their work.

swader999• 3 years ago

If only life was this simple.

DrNosferatu2• 3 years ago

Then you should never speak up to injustice?

Remember:

“First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”

— Martin Niemöller

Veen• 3 years ago

Sure, but ask yourself in each scenario if it has any impact beyond boosting your own sense of self-worth.

DrNosferatu2• 3 years ago

- What about if you’re an improviser?

TedDoesntTalk3• 3 years ago

Learn other ways of speaking besides improv?

belalebrar• 3 years ago

What if you're just a fake?

clankyclanker• 3 years ago

Sadly, there’s no “am I dominating the conversation?” multiplier. That’s the sort of thing I wild have lived to have in a hackerspace’s monthly meeting.

greesil• 3 years ago

You could use Roberts rules of order

pfix• 3 years ago

I am always fascinated that in US conversations Robert's rules of Order are assumed common knowledge (and in a way I envy that there's somewhat consensus that in a debate you use Robert's rules instead of reinventing the wheel each time people meet) but as not having ever been to the US it took some research to figure out what these rules actually are and if there are alternatives or how things governed by Robert's Rules are handled elsewhere (reinventing the wheel it seems)

And Bottom Line Down Last

10 minutes[^1]

[^1]: https://archive.org/details/robertsrulesofor0000unse/page/1/... p. 39

whoiscroberts2• 3 years ago

I agree.

motohagiography• 3 years ago

Several years ago I started just walking away from people when they ignored body language and conversational cues and wouldn't stop talking. As a result, there is now a cadre of people who both talk at great legnths and think I am rude. However, I used the extra time to get better at the things I do, so the extra bit of disparagement nets out.

Using Russell Brand as an example, how do you describe the pattern that causes the kind of infinite nested open loops that make a polite interruption impossible? I'm occasionally guilty of it myself, where when my ignorance stupefies people into silent awe, it can read as rapt interest, but I try to always start with the intent to ask a question. What's a good conversational interrupt signal to give?

TedDoesntTalk3• 3 years ago

What's a good conversational interrupt signal to give?

“Excuse me, I need the bathroom.”

Eisenstein• 3 years ago

What works sometimes is to raise your hand slightly and then:

A) as politely but forcefully as possible admit you don't care what they are talking about ("I am afraid you have lost me here") then either pivot the conversation or make an excuse to leave

B) repeat to them in brief what they have said and affirm that you are completely with them on their point and either add your point to it or pivot the conversation or make an excuse to leave

bentcorner• 3 years ago

when they ignored body language and conversational cues and wouldn't stop talking

Aka "terminal squirm" - that thing people do where they start turning their body and backing up to signal they want out of a conversation.

I learned this term a long time ago and quite surprisingly it only has a single page of hits on google.

abroadwin• 3 years ago

I'm a fan of the Buddhist approach of "right speech": Is it timely, true, gentle, beneficial, and spoken with a mind of good-will? If so, say it.

Jeff_Brown• 3 years ago

Better still is to be attentive to, and sometimes explicitly solicit, feedback from your audience.

General rules like these are useful with enormous audiences, because they are so heterogeneous that you have to play to the average. But even in that case, your sense of the average should be getting continually updated, people samples will differ -- Chicago is different from Miami, grad students are different from management types, 2023 audiences are different from 2018 audiences, etc.

danielvaughn• 3 years ago

This reminds me of one of my favorite scenes from Halt and Catch Fire, when the marketing guru tells the sales engineer (in no uncertain terms) when to shut up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOR8mk0tLpc

yowzadave• 3 years ago

Mostly good guidelines, although I disagree with this one:

Will you be reading a prepared, written copy of the speech?

I feel that when a speaker reads their speech word-for-word, especially if they are visibly reading, then it takes away from their ability to communicate. People like to make eye contact, and feel like a speaker is talking to them--when a speaker is reading, it has a distancing effect.

Better to write the speech out (either word-for-word or in bullet form), learn it deeply, and then say it without looking at the text. This lets you phrase things in a natural way in the moment, to make eye contact, to adjust the rhythms of speech to make the communication more effective.

whoiscroberts2• 3 years ago

Is safe, optimal, maximum the amount of time I should not talk for or the amount of time I can talk for?

When to Shut Up: A Visual Guide (With Included Algorithm)

Related Stories