Ibramenu: Bash-based self-hosted app deployment

by indigodaddy • 3 years ago

50 38 3 years ago

cloudc0de• 3 years ago

ibracorp is a great resource for the homelab and self-hosting community. I have found their discord community to be especially welcome and helpful to anyone getting started.

ficklepickle• 3 years ago

Not much info in the readme yet, the website might be a better link

https://ibramenu.io

dang• 3 years ago

Ok, changed to that from https://github.com/ibracorp/ibramenu. thanks!

preseinger5• 3 years ago

if you're using bash your file extension should be .bash, not .sh

and your shebang line should be `#!/usr/bin/env bash`, not `#!/bin/bash`

the current state of your project does not inspire confidence

preseinger5• 3 years ago

i am not sure why anyone would downvote this comment

everything i've said here is objectively true

tommiegannert• 3 years ago

Your last line was very dismissive, and the first ones were a minor detail. If you had just said it as a helpful suggestion to improve compatibility, it would have been fine. Had you dismissed it because of something fundamental to the project's goals, it would probably have been fine.

From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html:

Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

I can see someone interpreting your argument as "shallow," at least in the sense that the project overall may still be useful. Or it might be a good start, or they need your help to improve.

Also:

Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.

(And I say this as someone who, just this week, forgot to change #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash when I started adding Bash-specifics to a script.)

hakre4• 3 years ago

this is a pure code style issue, with the twist you're not aware of code-style.

so IMHO barking the wrong tree.

bityard• 3 years ago

Seems to be a growing trend lately to confuse objectively and subjectively. There's no universal law of nature that says shell scripts must be named a certain way, or contain exactly a certain shebang among several alternatives. These are just people's opinions, which by definition are subjective.

And anyway I've been writing shell scripts for over two decades and can't remember the last time I've seen foo.bash, if I've ever seen it at all.

Fnoord• 3 years ago

Objective truth is one (albeit important) aspect of communication.

Try to say it in a nice manner. Please consider making a PR or GitHub issue instead. Being civil makes people thrive, and easier accepting your feedback.

Don't get me wrong: I often make the same mistake you made. Its a continuing learning process, and being on the spectrum doesn't help (at least, in my case not).

kwhitefoot• 3 years ago

Why do they need a file extension at all? The extension doesn't mean anything to the system.

I agree that the shebang should be #!/usr/bin/env bash though.

gjvc• 3 years ago

Agree. I come across this all the time from people who should know better. Furthermore, eventually the actions taken by that file will outgrow bash, so if you wanted to replace it with something written in python (for example), you could with no loss of naming integrity.

Turing_Machine3• 3 years ago

I agree that the shebang should be #!/usr/bin/env bash though.

That's not at all a given.

This will use the first "bash" that it comes across, which has its good and bad points, while `#!/bin/bash` will use that specific one (if it exists). If J. Random User has been manipulated into installing a fake bash (or if the package installer or whatever has installed a fake bash) somewhere in his path, the env method can be very bad indeed. In general, that's going to be a far easier thing to do than installing a fake bash in /bin.

In general, /bin/bash is gonna work fine, either because that's where it actually is (the overwhelming majority of *nix systems in use today, including most or all Linuxes and macOS), or the system and/or system administrator has created a link from /bin/bash to where it's actually located.

It doesn't really gain you a whole lot anyway. If there's no guarantee that bash is located at /bin/bash, there's even less of a guarantee that env is located at /usr/bin/env.

savolai3• 3 years ago

What is this exactly? I have clues from the site but can't seem to bring it quite together. A script to deploy a curated selection of apps or tools in containers to... local home pcs? Who is the target audience? What's the value proposition exactly?

marcodiego• 3 years ago

Nice page, but I couldn't infer what they are selling or presenting. Looks like it has something to do with automation and deployment.

kykeonaut• 3 years ago

This website really suffers from the aesthetic-usability effect [0]. Nice animations, but I can't figure out what they are trying to say.

[0] https://ericaheinz.com/notes/give-it-the-craigslist-test/

discordance2• 3 years ago

What part didn't you get?

It's a trusted, proven system, that's free and open source and is easy to use. It's truly an endlessly scalable thing.

savolai3• 3 years ago

The “why” or “who” is what I don’t get. Why would someone use this? In what scenario?

See also other subcomments.

zx8080• 3 years ago

This could be a chatgpt prompt used to generate this project :)

majestic5762• 3 years ago

Crappy stuff. Why is HN upvoting this?

hdjjhhvvhga• 3 years ago

I'm not being dismissive, but looking at the code doesn't inspire confidence. There are several minor point but the major one for me is that several variables are not quoted which will create problems sooner or later. It really should be fixed.

lionkor• 3 years ago

Really, shellcheck would solve this.

hakre4• 3 years ago

or to lower the burden of the previous poster who may be expecting quotes always (as it otherwise requires more concentration in review - which would produce details I'm missing in the previous original comment btw):

    shellharden

badgeek• 3 years ago

why selling this? i read on the code it is using ruby a lot, also better to use caprover instead, it is really open source and easy to use both command line and web based UI,

wkat4242• 3 years ago

I couldn't find a list of applications it supports. That would be the first thing I'd want to know, because if major apps I'm wanting are missing it's a non starter.

radiowave• 3 years ago

It turns out you can find these by going to their github page, and manually trawling through the various subfolders of /MenuOptions/.

Not exactly putting key information front and centre.

pratio• 3 years ago

Any reason to use this instead of Ansible? The video shows that this package or script needs to be transported to the host machine before it could be executed or perhaps I understood it wrong.

(Edit) So, I checked out the repository, I personally wouldn't use it or recommend it to anyone. It's a collection of bash scripts, it'd be a pain to debug, log and fix. Ansible playbooks are a much better option. You should be able to version control your deployments and configurations these days.

hakre4• 3 years ago

It looks like a much more specialized system than Ansible in this case.

More specialized systems may bring the burden that they are harder to debug (Ansible is also astonishing hard to read the debugs' -vvv output btw.) but with the benefit to be better suited for the specialized job.

And as long as you've got the sources, you can easily put it under version control. I fail to see why this should be only possible with python scripts and yaml files and not with shell scripts.

woopwoop242• 3 years ago

so i have to use a menu, to select a dozen things to setup a single system, with the non changeable defaults, they will select for me. (why would i install node, or dos2unix or midnight commander?) and they install as default ruby, which most of use don't use at all so giving us bloat for not much function.

it writes its alias in the global space instead of the local user

echo $insert_alias | sudo tee -a /etc/bash.bashrc

This feels like a tool for users switching from windows to linux, to be able to flatten the learning curve. For any user that is a little bit familiar with linux, this i a major downgrade to any other toolset IMO.

i would open an issue, but they don't offer that on the repo

to post feedback you have to register with a service called "Canny"

the other issues channel is discord

a few suggestions:

- run shellcheck and fix the issues and warnings

- publish tags, so people can select versions

- add customization to the installed packages

- actually document how to use the parameters, the scripts offer, instead of just not doing that

- add an uninstall script!

- add a silent command (run with parameters to automate the menu selects, why would i want to do this manually or remember what i selected on every machine?)

I mean its free and all, but reads like a product, which needs a developer who cares about a few industry standards, or just needs more time (first code commit was on Nov 27, 2022

Sounds like it fits their needs, but ansible sounds like a much better choice and also sounds like they have the "not invented here" problem

toppy• 3 years ago

What a review! First I thought it was kinda TUI builder then maybe Ansible replacement. After you wrote about midnight commander dependency I have no idea what it is...

woopwoop242• 3 years ago

to be fair, you can select to install any "basic packages" but it is all or nothing

Ibramenu: Bash-based self-hosted app deployment

Related Stories