Apple reportedly expanding iMessage to compete with Facebook

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/22/apple-reportedly-expanding-imessage-to-compete-with-facebook.html

by prostoalex • 5 years ago

36 46 5 years ago

api2• 5 years ago

I'd love to see iMessage for Android or even desktop iMessage for Windows and Linux. I would use iMessage more. I think it would grow Apple's network, not threaten it.

angryasian• 5 years ago

yeah, I really don't see a majority of apple users ever leaving the apple ecosystem because imessage is supported on Android and vice versa. What I do see is that Android users that aren't part of the apple ecosystem at all using it and now Apple has their foot in the door with these users.

bobthepanda• 5 years ago

This is also not new grounds for Apple; this is the exact plot they did for iTunes to dominate digital music sales.

viraptor• 5 years ago

It would be great, but I wonder how realistic it is to expect. iMessage seems to be pretty strongly tied to the apple account identity, their internal credentials, their push servers, etc. https://www.nowsecure.com/blog/2021/01/27/reverse-engineerin...

They'd have to either rewrite quite a bit to be more ecosystem-independent, or somehow port all the necessary layers to work on other systems. There's a good reason nobody reverse engineered and reimplemented iMessage so far, even though it's "just a messaging app".

api2• 5 years ago

AFAIK those are all libraries that can be compiled in. It would be far less work than porting iTunes and they did that until iTunes died.

sfifs2• 5 years ago

Not expanding iMessage and Facetime to other OSes when they had the chance was the single most foolish strategic decision Apple ever took. It's what allowed Whatsapp and WeChat and Line and Snapchat and Slack and Teams and Zoom even Instagram to a certain extent to happen. Not surprising given Jobs's famously monopolistic tendencies that he's passed on to the current leadership he's groomed but it did do the shareholders a major dis-service

atonse2• 5 years ago

I think it’s the best decision they made and has taken courage to stick to it.

There’s actually been a network effect especially with groups of people with being a “blue bubble” vs “green bubble”.

Doesn’t look like this has cost them financially at all.

I even feel like whenever I have to SMS someone, it feels like going backwards. It’s not encrypted, there’s no delivery receipt, no richness, etc.

I’m just amazed that Google has utterly failed to build a viable alternative on Android in 10 years (which is why all the other services have thrived there), and boy have they tried.

easton• 5 years ago

Jobs actually stood up at WWDC when he launched FaceTime and said “we’re going to the standards boards tomorrow and making this a fully open protocol”, then when they got hit with a patent suit, rearchitected it to be less peer-to-peer and didn’t open it up. Then, when iMessage came along, they probably figured what’s the point.

throwawaysea• 5 years ago

They make a lot of money off their hardware though, and iMessage is a key part of retaining users each upgrade cycle on their own hardware. It certainly has been an issue for me.

On the other hand, I wish everyone would just use some other network as the standard, instead of something owned by Facebook or Apple or other giant Silicon Valley company. After Facebook started censoring private messenger communications between people, I just can’t trust them and am unwilling to give them a chance.

aparsons• 5 years ago

They should have done this a long time ago. Sharing photos in a non-attachment format with close friends is a feature I wish iMessage had. I hope they borrow a little from Google+ circles. Android support will also be very welcome. Apple isn’t the greatest at usable software interfaces, but I quite enjoy the thought they put into the interactions.

djrogers• 5 years ago

They should have done this a long time ago. Sharing photos in a non-attachment format with close friends is a feature I wish iMessage had

Well, they built that into photos ages ago (shared photostreams - they’re awesome for weddings and parties), and if your phone can run iMessage, it’s also already running photos…

mandeepj• 5 years ago

Snapchat is literally Apple iMovie effects in an app. So, Apple definitely missed that idea.

NoPicklez2• 5 years ago

The problem for me is that at the moment everyone I talk to is on Facebook messenger, many of them I don't even have their mobile numbers to message them through iMessage. Having added them on Facebook many years ago, rather than meeting them and asking for their mobile number. Many of my friends don't even use the Facebook app just the messenger function because it seems as though everyone is on it.

iMessage has great features, but I just can't stand using multiple messaging applications if I don't need to and I'm not going to switch to iMessage by asking all my friends for their mobile numbers. It means I don't be part of the groups that have been created for years among peers and friends.

I don't really see how iMessage can compete.

HWR_14• 5 years ago

The idea that I would call someone a friend and not have their mobile number, or if I didn't would feel awkward about asking for their number, is alien to me.

iMessage works, and I believe in their E2E encryption. Using it is the reason I opted into the iOS ecosystem.

NoPicklez2• 5 years ago

The reason for me is that when I grew up SMS messages weren't as an early teen and instant messaging platforms such as Facebook allowed me and my friends to chat using minimal mobile data, which was much much cheaper than SMS messages. As a consequence, the majority of my friends, family and circle were on Facebook and it just so happened that I could also message them for what was essentially free.

Furthermore, if I was at school and I met someone I would just add them on Facebook. Which was much easier and seamless then asking everyone for their mobile number.

I never said that iMessage doesn't work, just that you can only take full advantage of its features with other Apple users. And my continued use of Facebook messenger has been because of how myself and my friends grew up using Facebook. As a result all of my friends can currently talk and collaborate on Facebook messenger where the experience is the same regardless of the device you have.

MiddleEndian• 5 years ago

I prefer to use my computer to message people, and chat apps like Messenger work effortlessly on both PC and mobile devices. Most of my friends and I chat on Messenger or Discord (formerly Hangouts but Google is determined to kill it for some reason (and more formerly AIM/MSN/Yahoo)).

My girlfriend and I probably dated a couple months (and knew each other for about a year prior) before exchanging phone numbers.

rsa255192• 5 years ago

"The #1 most difficult [reason] to leave the Apple universe app is iMessage ... iMessage amounts to serious lock-in,” was how one unnamed former Apple employee put it in an email in 2016, prompting Schiller to respond that, “moving iMessage to Android will hurt us more than help us, this email illustrates why.”
“iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove [an] obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones,” was Federighi’s concern according to the Epic filing. Although workarounds to using iMessage on Android have emerged over the years, none have been particularly convenient or reliable.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/9/22375128/apple-imessage-an...

Red_Leaves_Flyy• 5 years ago

Apple may have dropped the ball with that move. Apple skipped the embrace step of embrace expand extinguish. If they had embraced all phone users by porting imessage to all phones and extended by providing an objectively better experience, for all users and use cases, they would have captured the market like 1980s Bell did. Instead I suspect that Apple is trying hard to avoid antitrust action. so apple stifles innovation and keep prices high preventing a great deal of adoption and, importantly, allowing significant competition outside their targeted, profitable, user base. Why disrupt and capture the entire market when they can slowly iterate and make fortunes while avoiding a lot of scrutiny?

tomjen32• 5 years ago

Unless they make it work on Android it won't matter. A messaging system that doesn't cover your entire friend group is, in effect, pointless.

rPlayer6554• 5 years ago

I see a lot of people taking about the network effects of imessage and how there is the "blue vs. green" bubble stigma. I think this may be a pretty American perspective. From my limited experience in Europe (admittedly in a more international region) everyone just uses WhatsApp. I also know in India everyone uses WhatsApp to text. Maybe the imessage tie in is useful in the US (which is admittedly probably Apple's primary market) but I'm not sure how much it carries over to other countries.

devoutsalsa• 5 years ago

I hate iMessage because it subverts SMS. This is mainly a problem with my USA friends & family, especially my parents. If I unintentionally tie my phone number to iMessagee, my parents can no longer figure out how to contact me reliably. Sending an SMS on an Android and receiving a reply on my Mac is a shit user experience.

nojito• 5 years ago

You can disable being able to be iMessaged via your phone number.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201349

Apple reportedly expanding iMessage to compete with Facebook

Related Stories