Ask HN: How will more corporate acceptance of remote work play out?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23263256

by taurath • 6 years ago

45 19 6 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

Given that Facebook, Google, Twitter, Shopify, Coinbase, and many more companies are announcing long term plans to allow for vastly more remote positions, what do you think the effects will be to:

* The economy overall?

* High priced localities (SV, SF, NYC, Seattle, etc)?

* Rural economies?

* Engineer pay?

* Workers on visas, H1Bs?

twunde• 6 years ago

Workers on vias, H1Bs aren't really affected by remote work too much. They are affected by the rules that the administration has put in place around them. Visas are not being issued currently (I've got one co-worker stranded in his home country when he was getting ready to do his final GC interview). This really means that individuals on existing visas won't move jobs, foreign students graduating won't be able to get jobs within the US, and foreign citizens won't be able to get jobs within the US. Essentially, a significant portion of engineers in the hiring pool are no longer available. This may result in high engineer pay, although that's probably cancelled out by the number of companies who've had to do large layoffs.

kondu• 6 years ago

Can you please elaborate? what new rules by the administration are you talking about?

Spooky23• 6 years ago

In April, green card registration and issuance was suspended.

andarleen• 6 years ago

I may add to this list:

Workers mental health?

Workers standard of living?

s09dfhks2• 6 years ago

well FB just announced that engineers keen on moving out of CA will get salary adjustments. Itd be silly to think you can move to rural Idaho and keep your 500k/yr TC

grumple2• 6 years ago

If Google is willing to pay 500 but FB says you get cut to 250... you're going to work for Google. The companies will pay out as long as they get good returns on the money. Location will become irrelevant for pay.

If companies say you'll get a pay cut, it presents an excellent opportunity to poach some talent.

shakkhar• 6 years ago

Once Google realizes that people are willing to work for 250k, there really is no reason for them to continue to offer 500k. The salary inflation in the Bay area is at least partially fueled by a shortage of people willing to move there. There really is no way of extending the hiring pool while keeping salary at Bay area level.

grumple2• 6 years ago

I'm in a big city, but my company is fully remote. My salary is already on the high end for my city.

I see a lot of people concerned about wages going down. I suspect wages will go UP for most people as we're no longer trapped working with companies in our cities. There might be some slight downward pressure at big tech as people leave the bay for less expensive locales and are willing to accept less money to work at those companies if they get to stay in, say, Texas or other cheaper locales.

But in my opinion this is the greatest opportunity for workers in history - your options for employment are now unlimited. Companies are going to have to compete a lot harder to get the best talent when they now have to compete with every other company in the world. I've seen some suggest that the opposite would be true - companies can now get employees from anywhere. While true, companies have always had more power to hire from wherever they want - it's always been much harder as an individual to pick up and move your family across the country. You'll probably find it easier to get remote contracting work, too.

I expect this will cause some downward pressure on bigger city property values. Might cause a slight uptick for smaller cities and suburban areas. Rural areas might not have good enough internet yet and are spacious enough that they won't be very affected.

mech422• 6 years ago

I see a lot of people concerned about wages going down. I suspect wages will go UP for most people as we're no longer trapped working with companies in our cities.

I agree - it will open up a LOT more opportunities for those of us that work remotely. I'm guessing tech salaries will start to 'meet in the middle' regardless of location.

We also shouldn't forget that there is a shortage tech. workers, and more opportunities mean more competition and better offers regardless of location.

AuryGlenz• 6 years ago

My wife has been looking for a remote accounting job for nearly a year with no success. We’re in a rural area, and she has a local job with a large national company right now but has no desire to keep working there. I have an established photography business in the area and both of our families are local, so moving isn’t much of an option.

I’m really hoping this opens up some doors for her. She’s miserable where she is and has applied to quite a few positions with no bites.

droptablemain• 6 years ago

This is a rather optimistic view. Historically speaking, the capitalist class generally wields enough financial and political power to prevent a massive transfer of power to workers. We've seen this with the buildup and erosion of labor movements in the 20th century and since.

So whatever inherit or natural benefits may come about for workers due to the remote work boom, it's likely these gains will be purposefully offset.

take_a_breath• 6 years ago

I think the really question here is, what is the motivation for corporations to make this type of shift? History shows us it often isn’t to do what’s best for workers in the long-run.

sirmoveon• 6 years ago

The game will shift to a competition among state and local government policies. We already know how this game ends. More profit for corporate; less rights for the workforce.

NotSammyHagar2• 6 years ago

I disagree. What state or local govt policies matter, except maybe taxes? There are a bunch of states with no state income tax, probably even more with less state & local taxes than Cali. People already move to Seattle from SF because of no state income taxes and similar salaries (it's exp. in seattle but cheaper than sf, it's crowded in seattle but less than sf, etc).

I think there are about 5 tiers.

1. High taxes & many jobs and high salary (SF, NY),

2. None or minimal state/local taxes and semicrowded (Florida?) and medium or lower salary,

3. no taxes but high salary area (Seattle), high expenses,

4. some taxes but medium salary (Portland),

5. less or no taxes and more rural and not much remote work (most of the midwest or south outside big cities), much lower comp today.

rayhendricks• 6 years ago

I’d be curious about the potential for remote work in somewhere like NW or even central Mexico for remote positions? It would be possible to use zoom meetings for most things and when Covid is over it’s not that far from most places on the west coast. I’d think this would be a much better alternative to Eeu/Russia/India.

There are of course the cartels which need to be dealt with.

buboard• 6 years ago

bad news for equal opportunity in hiring

tmaly• 6 years ago

I think there will be some interesting dynamics between states.

Look at places like Florida or Texas without income tax, they are going to be able to draw away workers from states with higher income taxes.

This will create some revenue issues for states that rely on higher income taxes. I believe this will put further pressure on businesses and others that cannot perform work remotely.

NotSammyHagar2• 6 years ago

The pay in Seattle is generally about the same as bay area pay based on my exp (although people have quibbled with this). We have no state income tax, so wouldn't that be appealing? Texas is hot, Seattle is cooler and rainier, Florida is Florida ;-), everything has tradeoffs. If you just lived ~30 miles outside of seattle you'd be able to get a very inexpensive house and pass the "arguably working in seattle area" test.

My question is still what's the limit on 'claiming to work in <big city> area' when I'm fully remote. If I was working in a vacation house 30 miles away and my company is fully remote, then my tax situation is the same. I'm not moving there, it's my vac home say. Facebook et al need to define what working in the big city means? 50.1% or 183 or 4 days in the city? I know someone who was commuting into Seattle for 1.5 hours each way every other day, working at a seattle company. He's happy working from home now. Would he be working in seattle if he was at facebook?

I want the freedom to live in a cabin in the woods for a month with good internet.

Ask HN: How will more corporate acceptance of remote work play out?

Related Stories