Ask HN: HIPAA Hosting?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1780722

by kgrin • 16 years ago

14 31 16 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

My consulting company is working with a client to make some changes to their webapp (it's a health-care-related app - details aren't super-relevant). One of the items on their wishlist is "make it HIPAA-compliant". We're working with the client's lawyer to determine exactly what that means in practice, but it's clear that one of the items will be "host it on infrastructure other than the $10/mo. WebFaction plan".

The app itself is (relatively) simple systems-wise, so we don't really need a dedicated box and all the sysadmin and security headaches that come with it. But from my basic read of the HIPAA Security Rule, shared hosting (which abstracts away a lot of the sysadmin issues) won't cut it. We're primarily developers, not sysadmins, and certainly don't want to get into the server admin business on something with regulatory requirements.

Does anyone here have suggestions for either a host that can make this less painful (not even sure what that would entail), or a firm that specializes in the sysadmin side of things? (Preferably with HIPAA experience).

notmyname• 16 years ago

No shared hosting seems to imply that VPS won't cut it either--depends on what "shared hosting" really means. So you are left with looking for a dedicated hosting plan. I'd say check out a company like Rackspace (disclosure: I work there).

kgrin2• 16 years ago

Happy to use Rackspace or another dedicated server provider... the trick is that we don't want to be responsible for, say, security patches to the kernel.

So really the question is: is there a company that'll manage the damn server(s) for us so that we get to deal with a nice, clean abstraction similar to shared hosting?

Basically I want a HIPAA-compliant Heroku (though in this case not for Ruby).

icey• 16 years ago

It's not cheap, but Rackspace has people you can pay to do this sort of thing for you.

patrickgzill• 16 years ago

There are plenty of companies that will do this for you, probably from about $250 per month; what I would recommend is a reasonably powerful dedicated machine on which you install your own VPS solution.

Give one large VPS to your production app, and create other VPSes for testing or development purposes.

The reason you want to use a VPS on top of your own dedicated hardware is to gain the benefits of VPS control, including easy archiving of the entire system, snapshots, easy moves to new hardware even if the hardware is different, etc.

bradleyland• 16 years ago

The company we use, Rimuhosting, has sysadmin services available at $40/hr, which is pretty reasonable. Their dedi-server plans are reasonable as well.

CWuestefeld• 16 years ago

depends on what "shared hosting" really means

I think that's the key.

My employer hopes that a virtual machine on a private VLAN, with a fully-encrypted virtual disk, qualifies. This seems reasonable to me, but reasonableness isn't necessarily a part of any regulation.

thaumaturgy4• 16 years ago

FWIW, I think I recall the OpenBSD devs coming out pretty hard against considering a VPS to be "secure" in most senses of the word; they seem to have thought that there were theoretical ways for VPSs to on the same machine to break through their respective barriers.

I can't find any links about this though and it's been months since I've kept up on OpenBSD-misc, so I might be full of shit.

Personally, I would tend to choose a theoretically-insecure VPS over a vhost environment any day.

hmahncke2• 16 years ago

I don't know of a specific rule that prevents shared hosting - and if you do, I'd love to see it (as I mentioned, by company is in the middle of a similar process). What is clear is that you have to document access and changes, which could be trickier in a shared hosting environment. But if the host itself has processes in place, and documents them to you, you should be fine.

kls3• 16 years ago

The first company that gets to a certified HIPAA and PCI hosting cloud is going to have to figure out what to do with the buckets of cash they have lying around. I think for the enterprise PCI certification will be the event that gets the big (non-tech) guys out of running their own infrastructure. I would imagine that it would be the same for medical. As for you immediate question, I am sorry I can't help I don't know who if anyone is doing this. I am still looking for a PCI certified cloud as a portion of my customers are Public companies and not having to work on all their different infrastructures and being able to provide them a hosted solution would be great for me, but there is no way I could get into managing a PCI certified hardware infrastructure just to achieve that goal.

16s2• 16 years ago

As a point of clarification... HIPPA is a federal law. PCI is an industry standard (VISA, Mastercard, etc). That does not mean one is better than the other, I just wanted to clarify.

kls3• 16 years ago

Yes, I am aware of the difference but thanks for the clarification. My point was more to the fact that a specialized cloud provider could really fill a needed void here on both counts.

zorkerman• 16 years ago

I agree it would be great, I've gotten letters from Amazon that it is hipaa compliant but not PCI, and from rackspace that it is pci compliant but not hipaa.

kls3• 16 years ago

I did not know that Rackspace is PCI compliant. Thanks for that info.

hmahncke2• 16 years ago

HIPAA is more about documenting your intended process, and your actual actions, than it is about requiring any particular solutions provider. For example, it's entirely possible to build a HIPAA compliant web app on AWS:

http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2009/04/white-paper-creating-hipa...

My company is in the middle of this, and we haven't encountered any deal-breakers so far.

Kadrith3• 16 years ago

A system built from scratch can meet HIPAA, and HITECH, without much more than good security. The issue is often with companies that give security an afterthought or have older software that needs to be "made secure."

The key to that link is encryption; it gets Amazon off the hook for a lot of things.

keyist• 16 years ago

Had to research this before. Firehost is one of the names that came up often:

http://www.firehost.com/secure-hosting/hipaa

Their plans start from $845 monthly.

No affiliation, just passing info along.

You can't just rely on the provider though. All the server hardening in the world wouldn't help with apps that don't comply fully. Some of the audit requirements are bound to be very specific to the nature of your app.

thaumaturgy4• 16 years ago

I was curious what $845/month got you, so just for fun I looked. From the features part of that page:

1. Log Monitoring and Management: Not sure what they mean by this; surely it's something more complex than logrotate. Maybe rsyslog or something?

2. Continuous Vulnerability Monitoring: So, they follow the usual script sites & mailing lists.

3. Managed Anti-Virus Protection: I hope they aren't running on a Windows platform, and if they aren't, I'm not aware of very many current in-the-wild viruses for the various Linux distros.

4. 1 Gigabit Networking Infrastructure (Public and Private): Heh.

5. Two-Factor Authentication: I see this a bit, and it's usually mis-used. Unless they require you to physically submit a fingerprint, DNA sample, retinal image, or some other such thing, then it's not two-factor authentication.

6. Application and Database Server Isolation: They're running the application and the SQL instances on different servers, but if the application server gets compromised, then so does the SQL server, since the application needs automated credentials for the SQL server.

7. Managed SSL Service: Once a year they make sure your certificate is up-to-date.

8. Business Associate Agreement Friendly: What?

9. Managed Redundant Firewall Protection: Not sure what they mean by this. Either your firewall works, or it doesn't. Layering them doesn't do squat. If they mean that they have a hot spare ready to go in case of an outage, then that's a little better -- but still not that helpful if the app server or db server falls over for any reason.

10. Managed Redundant Web Application Protection (Port 80/443): What?

11. Managed Redundant DoS/DDoS Mitigation: This is nice, at least, since it requires a bit of infrastructure to do it right -- assuming that they can stand up to a multi-terabit-per-second hit, since that's what the botnets are packing these days.

12. Managed and Monitored Intrusion Detection: So, run-of-the-mill IDS + Nagios + remote logging.

13. Managed Proactive Operating System Security Patches: This is a lie unless they're personally writing and submitting patches. The most "proactive" you're likely to get otherwise is running a nightly update.

14. Managed Weekly Full Backups + Daily Differentials (Encrypted): I want to take just a moment here and toot our own horn: we do weekly fulls + daily differentials for our regular web hosting customers, for a heck of a lot less than $845 a month. They aren't currently encrypted, but that wouldn't be all that challenging to add on.

15: Highly Secure Data Center Environment: You can probably get the same "highly secure data center environment" from Rackspace, Hurricane Electric, or any of a number of other really big hosting providers.

16: VPN/SSL Provided for Server Management (RDP/SSH/FTP/SQL): Nice, but again, really not that hard to set up, especially for a turn-key environment.

TL;DR: I'm really surprised both at what qualifies as "HIPAA compliant hosting" as well as at the price charged for it. I wonder if the bulk of the cost goes towards paperwork or some other kind of administrative overhead? I certainly don't see the price reflected in their technical offering.

stoic• 16 years ago

"Highly Secure Data Center Environment", but no SAS70 certification... hmm.

RyanGWU82• 16 years ago

I thought "Two-Factor Authentication" referred to an RSA SecurID or something similar. Am I wrong? Why do you say "it's usually misused"?

firepowered4• 16 years ago

A few responses to this post:

1. Log Management is required for PCI and HIPAA compliance. We use a product called LogLogic and review all required logs on a daily basis and remediate anything that comes up. LogLogic is the solution we put into place: http://www.loglogic.com

2. External vulnerability scans on the application and network layer.

3. Managed A/V protection. We have customers on Windows and Linux. Also detects malware and trust me - enough Linux threats out there as well.

4. GB network connectivity is absolutely correct.

5. Two-factor authentication is something you know (username and password) and something you have (dongle, ID, etc). Our two-factor is powered by phonefactor and is a great way to serve this need.

6. We use other methods to ensure this doesn't happen. (Encryption and Database Monitoring with strict rules).

7. Correct.

8. It's an absolute requirement for an organization going after HIPAA compliance to have a business associate agreement (google it for more info) and we're BAA friendly where most hosting providers are not.

9. It's redundant meaning if there's a physical firewall fail there's no loss in connectivity.

10. This protects your web application from the biggest threats on the net. Learn more here: http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Web_Application_Firewall

11. We block DDoS attacks everyday. Not all of them are high bandwidth. Google slowloris dos and learn more as an example.

12. Couldn't be more wrong. =)

13. Read #12

14. Congrats for being responsible.

15. Our datacenter meets strict requirements for redundancy and security as would other top facilities.

16. It's a nice security feature and integrates with our two-factor authentication. If your network is open to SSH (or other management ports) there's a lot to discuss.

Regarding the price, shop other managed hosting providers and you will find none that's transparent on what they offer and display pricing. Go ahead and secret shop them and you will see how low we've priced the FireHost's solution.

Also, we have our SAS70. However, that's going away for the SSAE 16 standard FYI.

Hope that helps and best of luck!

firepowered4• 16 years ago

This is absolutely correct. Your managed hosting company has a portion of the responsibility for HIPAA compliance which is why we say "Compliance Ready".

An organization has to have their own application specific needs met, business and process controls, database table obfuscation, etc. etc.

What's important is selecting a provider who has all the hosting needs met to achieve compliance with your auditor and will execute a business associate agreement as required.

Best of luck with your search.

16s2• 16 years ago

One other issue to consider is that just because your hosting provider's infrastructure is HIPPA compliant doesn't mean your application is. There are still a ton of privacy issues within the application, plain text HTTP, user authentication, etc.

kgrin2• 16 years ago

Yep - we're aware of all that, and we can handle the various app-level changes... we just don't want to be in the "ongoing server maintenance" business.

justlearning• 16 years ago

Depending on your fit/needs, it may be worthwhile to check out if the end client would like to maintain this box. That way, you are on their network. The disadvantage is of course the administration.

We did this on a pilot project with one of our clients with hipaa requirements. We asked for box with the minimum requirements with admin/firewall setup and used this server as our end point for our app. hope this helps.

zfierstadt• 16 years ago

I work for a managed infrastructure firm that specializes in scaling out secure platforms for customers that require HIPAA compliance - might want to check it out.

http://www.lightcrest.com/security/hipaa

Ex Myspace/Microsoft folks - lots of in house experience building high-volume sites that get pounded with malicious traffic.

Cheers

Ask HN: HIPAA Hosting?

Related Stories