Chrome 6: Early peek under the hood

http://www.geek.com/articles/google/chrome-6-early-peek-under-the-hood-2010076/

by thomas • 16 years ago

64 21 16 years ago

brunt• 16 years ago

http://img.deepgamers.com/1278097072.png A friend of mine has benchmarked the beta of Chrome along with several other browsers on his own PC. It's pretty impressive except for that weird box that gets cut out from the acid3 test.

CoryMathews• 16 years ago

why the need for such a large picture to show such little info?

natmaster• 16 years ago

Why only prereleases for IE and Chrome? Also that HTML5 test is bogus as its weights are completely arbitrary, counts things that were rejected by the W3C like Web SQL Database, and does not verify correctness (e.g., Chrome's implementation of WebSockets does not match the current draft.)

chc• 16 years ago

The HTML5 test doesn't include rejected features in its score. It gives a score based on actual HTML5, and gives a separate number of "bonus points" based on related technologies that make the browser more compatible with others.

moron4hire• 16 years ago

Does the Chrome team think they need to reach version number parity with the other browsers? At least from a UI standpoint, the current version of Chrome that I'm using (5.0.375.99 Beta) is not enough different from the first Beta to warrant 4 full version numbers. About the only features that I can think of that are visibly new are the themes and the extension system. Did themes come with v4?

Also, if there are good reasons to warrant full version number change, then why are those versions installing automatically? A full version change is not an "update". It should be much more explicit to the user that a new full version is available.

pohl• 16 years ago

Version number parity is kind of amusing and silly because version numbers are arbitrary, right? But if version numbers are arbitrary, then on what basis can one say that a higher number is not warranted?

andreyf2• 16 years ago

if version numbers are arbitrary, then on what basis can one say that a higher number is not warranted?

I'm just really angry that they're changing meaningless numbers as if they have meaning. They're such idiots for thinking the numbers matter enough to change them.

risotto• 16 years ago

No. I'm not involved with Google or Chrome but I follow a few tickets.

4, 5, and 6 are just milestones for project planning. Version 6 is about feature parity across platforms. They've been cranking on code quite intensely and therefore hitting the milestones quick.

This last v5 to v6 change was a little surprising as the browser skin changed, but there are no major features that make v6 wildly different from v5. It's just a continuum of tiny updates silently getting applied in the background.

It has nothing to do with Firefox 4 or IE 9.

adamdecaf• 16 years ago

4,5,6 are just milestones for features.

Branches (6.0.477.0) = 477 are self explanatory.

"Missing" or arbitrary branch numbers are mostly due to failed ideas.

alextgordon• 16 years ago

It seems the chrome team simply doesn't do "releases". Chrome evolves over time, and every so often they bump up the release number, but they're not working to a release in the same way as Photoshop or Firefox. This reduces the significance of the release number, but that's just a product of the differing development model.

sliverstorm2• 16 years ago

I'm pretty sure we are just being exposed to the internal developer versions, which don't have the arbitrary stupidity of public-facing versions. All the numbers mean is 'this build is more recent than the build you have on your machine'.

InclinedPlane• 16 years ago

The Chrome team uses version numbers in a very developer centric way. Any time they want to make a major breaking change they bump the major version number, irrespective of any marketing needs. This has the added benefit, as was intended with version numbering from the get-go, of making it dead-easy to determine which major features are in which release.

icefox• 16 years ago

Wonder how many sites search for 6 in the user agent to filter I.E. 6 or to set a custom css file

_flag• 16 years ago

None worth visiting I'm sure.

clusterfu_k• 16 years ago

That just wouldn't work on so many levels.. So many version strings of, i assume, every browser have the number 6 in them.

Maybe I'm not understanding you?

bombs• 16 years ago

  <!--[if IE 6]>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="ie6.css" />
  <![endif]-->

The standard way to show a custom stylesheet to IE6 only is to use the IE6 conditional, which is ignored by all browsers except IE6, because it's semantically a comment and other IE browsers will ignore it, because they don't match the version number.

elblanco• 16 years ago

One thing I do wish is that they'd stop mucking about with the security model in places that weren't important. Ever since they stopped allowing local xml files to render with stylesheets, my life has grown much harder.

Chrome 6: Early peek under the hood

Related Stories