Research points to to conscientiousness as the one trait to rule them all (2014)

http://time.com/3136568/science-points-to-the-single-most-valuable-personality-trait/?

by brandonhall • 11 years ago

35 11 11 years ago

time.com

amelius• 11 years ago

Conscientiousness is the state of being thorough, careful, or vigilant; it implies a desire to do a task well.

My coding is extremely clean, but my desk looks like crap. So what is the verdict?

TeMPOraL• 11 years ago

It means you care about your code, but your desk is simply not important to you.

I'm the same. Why people seem to have problems with that? There's limited amount of things we can care about. Some people simply care about different things than most.

misev• 11 years ago

Did you task yourself to clean the desk?

blackkettle• 11 years ago

The article and all the quoted studies do indicate that conscientiousness is probably the most important positive trait (which I guess will elicit a few irreverent 'no duh's), but it also points out there are some equally powerful and opposite traits like neuroticism low agreeableness, which lower the utility of being conscientious. The title sort of omits the latter part.

milansm• 11 years ago

"To be blunt, having your shit together is a respectable quality."

Not a native speaker, but I am surprised to see this kind of language in a magazine like Time. Is this normal for printed editions as well?

digbyloftus• 11 years ago

It's an opinion piece by a guy who spends his time pumping out listicles and great journalism such as "How the Hunger Games Can Help You Stop Procrastinating". I don't think it's one of their main articles/something that would appear in print.

tomaskafka• 11 years ago

Coming soon :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy

glxc• 11 years ago

is this the same thing as awareness?

Nutmog• 11 years ago

That's consciousness.

jchrisa• 11 years ago

The article contrasts conscientiousness with creativity, saying perhaps we give short shrift to people who are actually creative.

lutusp• 11 years ago

The article quotes the currently popular psychological "grit" literature more than once, to support the idea that creative people, notwithstanding their gifts, are often extremely annoying. For those who missed a recent drama, a psychological diagnosis called "Asperger's" was briefly popular, until people noticed that many very successful people met the diagnostic criteria (Albert Einstein, Bill Gates, Thomas Jefferson, Isaac Newton among others). So psychologists, nothing if not flexible, unceremoniously dropped Asperger's and replaced it with the "grit" meme. The latter condition celebrates the same traits that the former condition condemned.

But the article is titled in a way that contradicts its own conclusion, which is that creative people may be seen only as uncooperative and antisocial, at least when they're young.

Research points to to conscientiousness as the one trait to rule them all (2014)

Related Stories