Ask HN: If you had 15-20k to take a 2-4 week trip, solo, what would you do?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10120520

by throwaway9er • 11 years ago

19 36 11 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

mtmail2• 11 years ago

The amount is enough to travel the world for a year. Unless you want to spoil yourself with first class flights and 5 star hotels you'd be hard pressed to even spent it.

How about climbing Mount Kilimanjaro (takes a week), then relax on the beach for a week and give the remaining 15k to a local orphanage?

throwaway9er3• 11 years ago

It's a thought experiment. Assuming I haven't travelled in years and may not be able to again. Decadence was not the goal, as is neither spending or wasting all the money unnecessarily. It's the classic pickle, stay in a few places for a long time or barely get to know/appreciate multiple. Honestly looking for ideas I can expand on...

mtmail2• 11 years ago

Ok, it sounded like the thought experiment had the requirement to spent that amount.

semicolondev• 11 years ago

Going for people and culture ?

Pick different culture. Stay in one country/city, exploring it to the fullest, making friends. Learning to sign their songs.

Going for refreshment and nature ?

Hop in multiple places.

pmtarantino2• 11 years ago

Where are you? It is not the same if you are already in Europe, Asia, etc...

throwaway9er3• 11 years ago

American residing in US

pmtarantino2• 11 years ago

You could go to South America if you want to know new whole cultures. Though the big cities may look like the big cities at the United States, the lonely places are something totally new (search for Patagonia, for example).

If you want to know the big cities, including culture, I'd go to Europe. In four weeks you can visit culture capitols as Paris, London, Madrid, Rome, Berlin...

nly2• 11 years ago

Pay for a good friend to go with you.

arsalanb2• 11 years ago

A good friend wouldn't need to be paid, I think?

mkempe• 11 years ago

What I would do is unlikely to be what you would... There is a huge difference between 2 and 4 weeks.

With 2 weeks I'd possibly go to Antarctica because that's the only continent I haven't yet visited. With 4 weeks I'd visit the Galapagos, and walk some of the Inca Trail to Machu Picchu. Or I might go to Greece.

Btw a decade ago I traveled around the world for one year, for less than that amount. Best year of my life.

a3n3• 11 years ago

Road trip with my 17 year old to visit everywhere I've been, and tell the stories that the visits would inspire. I'm in the US, and I've been as far west as Kenya, and as far east as England.

throwaway9er3• 11 years ago

I like this. Thank you!

nly2• 11 years ago

as far west as Kenya

Not sure if you're being humorous but, from the west coast of the US, it's still a shorter distance to get to Kenya if you go east than it is if you go west.

a3n3• 11 years ago

It probably is, I haven't looked. But I went west, and stopped at other places in between.

S4M• 11 years ago

If he's on the West Coast, maybe he went to Kenya by crossing the Pacific Ocean.

akg_67• 11 years ago

For $5K, my wife and I recently did a 4-week road trip, a combination of staying in hotels, cabins, and camping. We visited:

- Spokane WA, - Glacier National Park MT, - Waterton National Park AB, - Banff National Park AB, - Jasper National Park AB, - Kamloops BC, - Vancouver BC

I will highly recommend trip to national parks in North America.

Last year, for about $15K, my wife and I travelled to Japan and India for 3 months. While 15-20K is plenty of money, 2-4 weeks is not enough to travel to lot of different places (multiple countries), may be enough for a decent size country. If you are into nature and hiking, I will suggest Peru.

bbcbasic• 11 years ago

I would prefer to travel solo-proper rather than use guided tours that provide the accommodation, company and excursions. I found that the day after day early starts, focus on consuming alcohol and being loud and having to be up for a party and all that not for me when I did that.

Having said that I found travelling alone to be quite lonely, even if I spoke to and socialized with people along the way. The best way (for me) would be to go with a friend or even better my family.

As for where to go. I would love to see more of Tasmania or NZ. Far northern or eastern Europe too. Get away from the cities and see the amazing scenery.

dwd• 11 years ago

Second NZ. Just spent a week in Queenstown and surrounds and wished I had a month to take everything in.

Ideally you would do two trips: one during the snow season and the other when it's warmer for the hiking season.

sydneyliu• 11 years ago

I think traveling and staying in 1 place or area is a great way to learn and immerse yourself in a new place. I don't think I'd need 15-20k to do it.

I'd spend all 4 weeks in an area where I don't fit in. Some South American country probably, perhaps Peru. As an Asian American, I think I'd feel too comfortable in any American, European, or Asian country. In South America I'd be able to challenge my comfort zone.

I'd use the money to take necessary precautions on necessary resources and safety, but otherwise, I'd go lean and rather push myself to do things and meet people there. I think 4 weeks is a good enough to time learn a new way of life and really change how you see things.

sytelus• 11 years ago

Sounds like lot of money and very little time. This means you should take opportunity to visit places that are otherwise expensive, you can travel to cheaper places like Asia, Africa, South America any other times ;). This will then boil down to options like destinations in Europe (example, Italy, Switzerland or France), Japan, Dubai or Galapagos. I would personally prefer Italy just because there is just too much to see and absorb there (Rome, Vatican, Venice, Florence, Milan and so many other little towns). This is assuming you want to do signtseeing + culture exploration. More rewarding form of travel is to learn something new and become expert at it while being in new place but it's hard to blow off 15-20K on that, may be unless you want to get jet fighter pilot training in Russia or learn to shoot arrows from horse in Japan.

Just for comparisons, about $25K is pretty good chunk of amount for a solo travel to go living around the world for entire year.

hprx• 11 years ago

The important part isn't money, it's time.

Go see the wonders of the world. Be in awe.

I would suggest India because it's a microcosm. Go north to the Himalayas and you can feel the majesty. Head to the west to the slums of Mumbai and you will understand poverty. Maybe go learn to meditate out there at a vipassana center. Visit Agra and the goggle at the opulence of the Taj Mahal. Then head to Varanasi and experience the rawness. Maybe you'll even see a miracle or two if you're lucky. Go to Hampi and see giant boulders stacked on top of each other like lego and be bewildered. Stay in a palace just for the hell of it. Take a motorcycle through small villages and be greeted by the children who've never seen anyone so pale or so dark. Sleep in a tent in the deserts of Rajasthan. Visit the holy places and wonder at the peacefulness.

But then again, India isn't for everyone, but it does have everything.

vram222• 11 years ago

Good points.

I'm Indian, so I'll add a few, particularly about some areas that are likely to be less well known to foreigners who may mainly have read or been told about the most popular tourist areas, such as the Golden Triangle (Delhi/Agra/Rajasthan), Goa and Kerala:

Go to parts of central India, e.g. Madhya Pradesh (MP).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhya_Pradesh

It's a big state. Lived there for some years. Apart from the usual touristic areas, of which there are some, try to check out the central Indian deciduous forests, comprising sal, teak, and many other species. (India has huge biodiversity.) I really enjoyed the many hikes I did in those forests.

Kanha National Park.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanha_National_Park

It has those deciduous forests I mentioned, with fauna that include tigers, gaur (Indian bison - the world's largest bovid), dhole (Indian wild dog), barasingha (swamp deer with 12-tined horns), etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_tiger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaur

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barasingha

Marble Rocks - sheer marble cliffs on both sides of the Narmada river near Jabalpur (MP). They offer boat rides down that stretch, so you can see the cliffs from up close. Seen it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marble_Rocks

In South India, less well known places include the "hill stations" (resorts) such as Kodaikanal, Coonoor (5-7000+ feet high, with a cooler climate, and mountain forests and orchards), many less frequented and less crowded beaches, etc. Temples are well known but there are a huge number of them, large and small, many with interesting architecture. Many wildlife sanctuaries in South India too. Seen wild elephants on hikes from the mountains to the plains. Bison too, many times, from nearby. They're huge, but peaceful, unless disturbed. Cape Comorin (Kanya Kumari), the southernmost tip of the Indian peninsula, where the Arabian Sea, Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal meet. Multi-colored sands there.

Seen some of the above.

The Western Ghats, a long mountain range down the western side of India, right from Mumbai to almost Kankyakumari, including the states of Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka and Kerala/TamilNadu. Lived in parts of it for some years. It's a biodiversity hotspot, with both deciduous and rain forests.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Ghats

A concert about India's environment and the Western Ghats, by Chinmaya Dunster and the Celtic Ragas band - A Sense of Wonder:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft8iJ_5R-Lw

jasonkester• 11 years ago

Personally? I'd take a One Year trip solo. That's the only way to spend that much money traveling.

I bet I could spend upwards of $2k in four weeks if I really tried, but honestly the places you'd have to stay and the things you'd have to spend your time doing would just be way too unpleasant. Think Cruise Ships, Hotels where people are wearing their Yachting Clothes, God forbid, Guided Tours.

It's just not worth it. Either save most of your money or find a way to get the rest of that year off, then go out and have some real fun

atmosx• 11 years ago

For that sum, I'll try to go Around the World in 28 Days :-) ... a bit like this guy[1].

Then write book or blogpost about it :-)

I'd take 2 to 3 days each city, then book a plain/train and move to the next... Take camera (new mobiles are good) and a diary (digital if you like). Eat specialties and drink the wines and juices each place makes. Talk to people a lot, write your experiences and think. Seize the moment when you find something awesome... Take pictures and videos afterwards :-)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phileas_Fogg

thecupisblue• 11 years ago

I'd go to Rome or Greece, and move upwards or downwards to pass through Croatia, and probably spend a day or two in each seaside city I like or at an island. If any time remains, go to Berlin and sightsee that amazing city.

lightlyused• 11 years ago

Ham radio dxpedition to somewhere on the dxcc most wanted list: http://www.clublog.org/mostwanted.php

tmaly• 11 years ago

I would probably go for South East Asia. Cathay Pacific has this All Asia Pass that lets you fly to all the destinations in Asia for a month on a single pass that starts around $1099. http://www.airtimetable.com/airpass_asia.htm

justinv• 11 years ago

Trip to Antarctica. National Geographic Expeditions runs tours down there that last around 10-30 days depending on the experience.

Looks amazing.

kat• 11 years ago

Travel to northern Canada (North West Territories, Nunavut) before the planet warms up too much. See the northern lights, go kayaking, go on wildlife tours (polar bears!, narwhales!), etc. I know someone who lucked out on a tour and ended up being the only person in the tour. Flights are incredibly expensive so it would use up some of your money. Donate the left over money to charity :)

vram222• 11 years ago

I'd visit one or more of the Central / Eastern European countries. Mainly because of the culture, geography and nature; okay, food too :) Poland / Czech Republic / Hungary / Romania / Slovenia / ...

Also check out my feed of some blog posts with images of nature, from different countries, including some of the above:

http://jugad2.blogspot.in/search/label/nature

aliston• 11 years ago

I'd travel on 5k and put the rest in my investment portfolio. The 5k limit will make the trip a lot of fun and force you to get out of your travel bubble to meet people. It will also lead you to more interesting experiences and force you to get creative.

If you really want to burn the cash, then spend another 1k on a day trading class along the way, and put the last 19k in a highly leveraged investment like options on GLD or something. Either way the investment goes, it'll make your trip a lot more exciting!

antb123• 11 years ago

Not really fair question as you haven't said what you like? Culture, Nature, Fun?

This guy has done it twice and raved about East Africa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Rogers

From my perspective I would hit the countries with the most people - China and India and then spend a week or so relaxing somewhere (Southern Europe(Greece Spain) or Israel)

staunch• 11 years ago

Hiking and sailing around the Mediterranean, touring ancient land routes and sea lanes.

hadeharian• 11 years ago

I would probably do some kind or genetic study as I traveled. There is some kind of interesting genotype(s) I would have to test for. This could be plant, animal, human. I wouldn't really care.

arsalanb2• 11 years ago

Fly to Africa, donate all the money I can to better education, healthcare, and living conditions, raise some more, donate that too, and then fly back.

Ask HN: If you had 15-20k to take a 2-4 week trip, solo, what would you do?

Related Stories