HN user

zteppenwolf

69 karma
Posts6
Comments19
View on HN

Do you have anything to improve remote (SSH?) development? Meaning: the frontend is GPU accelerated, and that is great, but if you are fetching pages from the server instead of caching the buffers and intelligently fetching the LSP (or whatever language backend is used) updates, we are bottlenecked by the SSH connection latency

No. Code will contain bugs, won't be self-contained (will depend on 3rd party libraries and frameworks), and often will not be complete as TODO features can't possibly be a spec

It's working fine for me.

I'm lucky enough to have upper management not pressuring to use it this or that way, and I'm using mostly to assist with programming languages/frameworks I'm not familiar with. Also, test cases (these sometimes comes wrong and I need to review thoroughly), updating documentation, my rubber duck, and some other repetitive/time consuming tasks.

Sometimes, if I have a simple, self-contained bug scenario where extensive debug won't be required, I ask it to find the reason. I have a high rate of success here.

However, it will not help you with avoiding anti-patterns. If you introduce one, it will indulge instead of pointing the problem out.

I did give it a shot on full vibe-coding a library into production code, and the experience was successful; I'm using the library - https://youtu.be/wRpRFM6dpuc

Rust's widely used serde library presents a large serialization overhead due to its visitor pattern, that is inefficient when compared to serialization implementations that simply follows the static declarations.

I'm personally not a big fan of CLion. Too heavy, not as near customizable as (Neo)Vim, this damned `.idea` folder, constant re-caching. I tried to use it a couple of times, but always ended up going back to Vim.

This is very cool! I created this small convenience script without the intent to customize `Termdebug` itself, leaving any preferences to the users. But I can see many nice things you added there that can combine very well with the two!

You can't justify the lack of commitment to truth with "its the bias of the population". First of all: its not. Its the bias of the media itself; however, the population often manifests much richer judgement than simply reducing this complicated struggle to "good vs evil".

And even if it was: the media should impartially cover events. It should not manipulate numbers in favor of cherry picked narratives.

edit replying your edit: But then; again, we should not create media based in wishful thinking. Instead, media should be based in facts. It disappoints me very much that so many people just accepts this blatant propaganda and sell these as if they are true.