HN user

yz-yu

372 karma
Posts27
Comments24
View on HN
neutree.ai 5mo ago

A Better Way to Prepare APIs for Agents

yz-yu
1pts0
neutree.ai 5mo ago

Show HN: Turn any OpenAPI spec into agent-callable skills

yz-yu
1pts0
yuyz0112.github.io 5mo ago

Show HN: Minimalist Glitch Art Maker (100% client-side)

yz-yu
25pts8
neutree.ai 5mo ago

How a vLLM-style inference engine works: The model part

yz-yu
1pts0
neutree.ai 5mo ago

Nano-vLLM: How a vLLM-style inference engine works

yz-yu
271pts27
github.com 5mo ago

Show HN: Convert OpenAPI Specifications into Agent Skills

yz-yu
1pts0
llm-fighter.com 11mo ago

Show HN: I made a tiny, playable benchmark where LLMs compete head-to-head

yz-yu
2pts0
yuyz0112.github.io 11mo ago

Show HN: I Built a Tool to Visualize Claude Code's LLM Interactions

yz-yu
1pts0
github.com 11mo ago

Show HN: Reverse Engineering Claude Code in a better way

yz-yu
1pts0
github.com 1y ago

LLM-Assisted Reverse Engineering: Decoding Claude Code in Under an Hour

yz-yu
1pts0
github.com 1y ago

Show HN: Reverse Engineering Claude Code with LLMs: Dive into the 4.6MB Cli.mjs

yz-yu
1pts0
github.com 1y ago

Minimal bolts.new implemented in <60 lines of shell for educational purposes

yz-yu
2pts0
github.com 2y ago

Show HN: Find the Best LLM for Your Needs

yz-yu
33pts1
relia.dev 2y ago

Show HN: Relia – Build your own LLM benchmark

yz-yu
3pts0
dewhale.pages.dev 2y ago

Show HN: Dewhale – GitHub-Powered AI for effortless development

yz-yu
11pts3
vxdev.pages.dev 2y ago

Show HN: Vx.dev – GitHub-Powered AI for effortless development

yz-yu
96pts34
step-saga-examples.pages.dev 2y ago

I Reverse Engineered Vercel's v0.dev Prompt and Code Optimization Logic

yz-yu
3pts0
github.com 2y ago

Show HN: V0.dev OSS Alternative, Customizable, Budget-Flexible, Live in GitHub

yz-yu
6pts4
www.myriptide.com 3y ago

Show HN: More productive low-code: create UI in code, perfect in GUI editor

yz-yu
1pts0
www.myriptide.com 3y ago

Building Web UI development in Go

yz-yu
4pts0
www.myriptide.com 3y ago

Show HN: Painless Web UI development in Go, and can also be other languages

yz-yu
4pts1
sunmao-ui.com 4y ago

Show HN: Sunmao – A framework for developing low-code tools

yz-yu
41pts10
www.rrweb.io 5y ago

Show HN: Rrweb 1.0 record and replay the web even better

yz-yu
15pts4
www.myriptide.com 5y ago

The new adventure of the rrweb community

yz-yu
1pts0
github.com 6y ago

Pixel-perfect screen sharing and remote control, without downloading client

yz-yu
2pts0
syncit.luckid.io 6y ago

Show HN: Syncit - An open source privacy-first co-browsing Tool

yz-yu
13pts2
www.rrweb.io 7y ago

Show HN: Open source JavaScript library to record and replay the web

yz-yu
353pts51

The comments here turned out much more interesting than I expected—this has become a great place to discuss the difference between AI-generated, AI-written, and AI-assisted content.

So let me start from @jbarrow's comment: "AI written, generated from the codebase."

My actual learning process looked like this:

1. I walked through the nano-vLLM codebase, asking Claude Code some high-level questions to warm up. 2. Then I asked detailed questions one by one, let it explore, and double-checked the code myself. As someone without an ML background, it sometimes took hours to understand a single concept. 3. Once I felt I understood enough, I started drawing Excalidraw diagrams to explain what I learned.

Does this count as "generated from the codebase"? I don't think so.

Where we might disagree is the writing process.

As a non-native English speaker, my workflow looks like this:

1. Write a short paragraph (<100 words), then ask my writing agent to "fix this for readability and grammar." 2. Review the output. *If it changes any technical meaning, I correct it.* I consider this a responsible way to write a tech blog. 3. Move to the next paragraph.

Is this "AI-written"? I'd call it "AI-assisted." Every idea in every sentence is mine. Honestly, things like "em dashes" never stood out to me when reviewing. I suspect that's common for non-native speakers.

I wrote this comment the same way. The LLM fixed 14 grammar mistakes that I think would distract readers more than any LLM-ish phrasing.

That said, I'm open to suggestions on how to improve my writing process :)

Hi jbarrow, thanks for your feedback and the links you shared—they're great readings for me (and likely others too).

That said, I need to clarify: the content was not written by AI, and certainly not generated from a database in one shot. If there's some agent + prompt that can produce what I wrote, I'd love to learn it—it would've saved me two weekends :)

Before addressing your questions further, some context: I'm a developer with no ML background but plenty of Cloud Infra experience. I'm currently building an open-source AI Infra project, which is why I studied nano-vllm. So my writing reflects some gaps in ML knowledge.

To your specific points:

it goes into (nano)vLLM internals and doesn't mention PagedAttention once

I didn't find any explicit "paged attention" naming in nano-vllm. After reading the first article you linked—specifically the "Paged KV Caching" section—I believe the block management logic and CPU/GPU block mapping it describes is exactly what I covered in both posts. It may not be the full picture of paged attention, but I interpreted what I saw in the code and captured the core idea. I think that's a reasonable outcome.

Part 2 will cover dense vs MoE's, which is weird because nanovllm hardcodes a dense Qwen3 into the source

This reflects my learning approach and background. Same as point 1—I may not have realized the block design was the famous PagedAttention implementation, so I didn't name it as such. For point 2, seeing a dense Qwen3 naturally made me wonder how it differs from the xx-B-A-yy-B MoE models I'd seen on Hugging Face—specifically what changes in the decoder layers. That curiosity led me to learn about MoE and write it up for others with the same questions.

---

I completely understand that in this era, people care more about whether what they're reading is AI-generated—no one wants to waste time on low-effort slop with no human involvement.

But as I explained above—and as my hand-drawn Excalidraw diagrams show (I haven't seen an LLM produce diagrams with logic that satisfies me)—this is the result of learning shaped by my own knowledge background and preferences.

Good question. Sunmao focus on the UI part means it was designed to integrate any kind of backend. And for FastAPI and other frameworks that provide OpenAPI schema, there should be a bigger potential to play with Sunmao, e.g, tables, forms, and other UIs that can connect to the API seamlessly.

As a personal suggestion, I think Sunmao is a little low-level(which brings great flexibility) to build such a kind of integration at this moment. It will be much easier after we provide some tutorials or examples of integrating with a backend framework. In the meantime, it will be appreciated if to join our slack channel and have some deep discussion.

rrweb's author here. Very happy to see people building commercial products on top of rrweb. Also paid a lot of time in the last several months to design and implement some new features to help the rrweb scale in production, such as the storage size. Hope it will keep helping people make more interesting stuff in this area.

Definitely learned a lot and enjoy the process and thanks for your really important suggestions.

Quote from my introduction blog post:

===

Today we already have some commercial session replay products like Logrocket, Fullstory, etc.

If you are just looking for a ready-to-use tool and would like to pay for its service, I would recommend you to use the above products, because they have well-tested backend services that can store the data for you and perform some higher order features.

===

So I don't think rrweb is a competitor of these commercial products.

Actually, I would like to see rrweb grows into a base of many commercial products in the future, which means it handles most of the privacy and security issues, so the other developers can build many fancy projects base on it without spending time on the hard part again and again.

Totally agreed with your consideration about privacy. Unfortunately, as I wrote in my blog post, some commercial products already shipped features like this.

So another passion of rrweb is to teach people the 'power' of the modern browsers, and I also wish rrweb has a chance to improve the standard of web privacy.