Upvoting for Europe's best efforts.
HN user
yvoschaap
Contact: yvo [at] yvoschaap.com Website: https://yvoschaap.com/
Ask China, they've been trying for a decade.
The number of support requests I got last year because of [hotmail|gmail|msn|yahoo].con > 30
Also tested against more models (OpenHermes, Mistral 7B, Yi, Goliath) with open router: https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fs...
Mistral 7B also answers with "7 books".
My domain was blocked from serving Adsense (for some a pedantic reason). Fortunate result, if I watch youtube loaded from their own embed script but hosted from my domain there are never ads!
Agree. The fine-tuning happens on the base "davinci" (or Curie, Babbage, Ada) and not a specific `text-00x`. At least not as I am aware.
Immediately we ran into a problem -- to fine-tune an OpenAI model requires a specific format of prompt-completion pairs:
From my understanding, you can leave the `prompt` empty, and just push `completion` with your text. That way you don't need to generate Q&A first.
I tried something similar like this to render thumbnail of websites (at a very small file-size). E.g. https://twitter.com/yvoschaap/status/1446397003316047872
7.3 arcminutes = 16 light-years
I remember sending fake Yahoo login forms as html attachments. eval() & alert() fix:
`const ev = 'ev', al = 'al', ert = 'ert'; window[ev + al](window[al + ert]('hi'))`
Arestreet in streetview 2009 https://www.google.com/maps/place/Aresstraat+21,+1363+VJ+Alm... walk one step forward, and you time machine into 2021!
I think the architecture has more to do that every individual plot allowed owners their own design & development.
Happy to see this here on HN. I usually get the sense Chrome Inspector new features seem to be inspired with what Polypane usually already offers.
Date published: 2018
Pretty sure the Google algo would feature a isHumanDisplayed() for the photo's that would qualify.
to take the long-term view, and to never be afraid of giving away their legos.
Is that a common expression, or a typo?
Yes. The Chrome devs refuse to accept there are viable cases for not allowing autocomplete.
The founders are well known and respected in The Netherlands. Not sure what you imply.
A story pitched to promote a business using a click-bait title about something that happened 6 years ago?
I forget this part in my blog post, but it goes like this. Once the website is accepted as the official website of the business, you can claim ownership by proving ownership of that website.
Given Slice owns the (fake official) website, it is instantly verified.
See: https://support.google.com/business/answer/7107242?hl=en
If you’ve already verified your business’s website with Google Search Console, you may be able to verify your listing instantly.
I'll try again: https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=23349819
Looked into what tricks they are doing in a short write-up here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23348815
The Google search results do show the owner' site as #1.
https://seobrowse.com/share/25c8f9129eaea94bf34531dd780a9438...
But if you look at the right sidebar under Menu and Order, you get all the Valley players who are trying to get a cut from the order...
Update: wow this is even worse. Slice is "verified" by Google as owner and abuses this by posting their coupons as "news" in the sidebar (look at "Mario's on Google" part lower down).
https://support.google.com/knowledgepanel/answer/7534902?hl=...
Great find! True hacker news worthy.
I caught Google a few years back with the same hijack, but then it was Metrolyrics: https://yvoschaap.com/weblog/misbehavior_by_google_lyrics_on...
We have a Recipe for https://teampa.ge which removes the need for our customers to embed our javascript snippet! It feels so much more better then having to ask people to change their website code. See: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pVFZN8ZQiiQ