HN user

yesplorer

1,050 karma

Programming Enthusiast, Nothing really.

Posts59
Comments158
View on HN
www.npr.org 6y ago

A Year In, First Patient to Get Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease Is Thriving

yesplorer
2pts0
www.bbc.com 6y ago

Tesla overtakes Volkswagen as value hits $100bn

yesplorer
7pts0
www.theage.com.au 6y ago

Bosses face manslaughter charges for suicides under new workplace laws

yesplorer
5pts0
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com 6y ago

Fremont Police Tesla Near-Dead Battery Forces Officer Off Pursuit

yesplorer
2pts0
www.cbsnews.com 6y ago

WeWork IPO filing shows it's losing nearly $5,200 per customer

yesplorer
41pts14
www.bbc.com 6y ago

Boeing warns it may stop 737 Max production

yesplorer
7pts0
medium.com 7y ago

How to lose $8k worth of Bitcoin in 15 minutes with Verizon and Coinbase.(2017)

yesplorer
3pts0
www.fastcompany.com 7y ago

The War to Sell Mattresses Is an Internet Nightmare (2017)

yesplorer
69pts81
www.bbc.com 7y ago

Facebook chief's emails exposed by MPs

yesplorer
1pts0
cyngn.com 9y ago

Update on Cyanogen

yesplorer
1pts0
www.nytimes.com 9y ago

Go to the Wrong Hospital and You’re 3 Times More Likely to Die

yesplorer
2pts0
imgur.com 10y ago

Adpocalypse: Forbes won't let me visit their website with Adblock on

yesplorer
2pts0
mobile.nytimes.com 10y ago

In Arbitration, a ‘Privatization of the Justice System’

yesplorer
119pts65
www.bbc.com 11y ago

Uber: Police Swoop in France and South Korea

yesplorer
4pts0
www.bbc.com 11y ago

Apple 'failing to protect Chinese factory workers'

yesplorer
7pts0
www.joshondesign.com 12y ago

Why You Can't Build a Smartphone (2013)

yesplorer
8pts3
www.bbc.com 12y ago

Apple apps made to run on Android devices

yesplorer
1pts0
www.bbc.com 12y ago

Airbnb in court over housing laws

yesplorer
1pts0
www.siliconrepublic.com 12y ago

Pebble (YC W11) sells 400,000 smart watches in its first year

yesplorer
46pts42
www.thedailyheap.com 12y ago

Experiment Alleges Facebook is Scamming Advertisers out of Billions of Dollars

yesplorer
22pts6
news.ycombinator.com 12y ago

Ask HN: What will happen if I try doing this?

yesplorer
4pts3
news.ycombinator.com 12y ago

Ask HN: Where did you hang out while HN was down?

yesplorer
53pts67
money.cnn.com 12y ago

Why credit hacks will keep happening

yesplorer
2pts0
blogs.hbr.org 12y ago

Would You Rather Have Brazil's Economic Problems or America's?

yesplorer
5pts0
business.time.com 12y ago

Steve Ballmer Doesn’t Want His Successor to Kill the Xbox, Bing

yesplorer
1pts0
ceylon-lang.org 12y ago

Ceylon (Programming language)

yesplorer
10pts0
joncrawford.com 12y ago

How I Got Kicked Out of Y Combinator and Then Raised $6.5m for My Startup (2011)

yesplorer
151pts71
www.dailymail.co.uk 12y ago

Stephen Hawking: physics is LESS interesting after 'God particle' discovery

yesplorer
1pts0
www.forbes.com 12y ago

What $105M Can Buy: Pivotal Launches Cloud-Hopping Platform For Enterprise

yesplorer
2pts0
192.168.1.1 12y ago

Web Configurator

yesplorer
2pts2

From Space X prospectus:

For launches of our Starlink satellites, the Company does not recognize any inter-segment revenue, rather those launch costs are capitalized in satellites in Property, plant, and equipment, net. We allocate a significant amount of launch capacity to our Connectivity segment, and expect to allocate a significant amount to our AI segment in the future. Our Space segment revenue only reflects our customer launches and customer activities.

For launches dedicated to deploying our Starlink satellites, we capitalize the associated costs within our Connectivity segment and depreciate them over time, and we do not recognize revenue for those launches in our Space segment.

Summary of the article: Conjectures, largely.

I don't hold any crypto but it seems all these hit pieces are intended for clicks and for the writers to be proven right at some point.

Nothing solid these articles unlike that of the FTX.

But like someone said, they rode the waive when things were great so perhaps they should bear this too.

Binance is fucked 4 years ago

You haven’t missed anything. It’s exactly it. Someone is trying to get some cheap clicks.

This is not true. The scam are usually carried out by highly illiterate young boys who simply carry a file containing files labeled as first letter, second letter, third letter and so on. Then they go phishing with these.

I’ve seen this idea of they’re trying to filter out educated people so often that it makes me laugh. They aren’t , they’re simply dumb.

"starlink is going to... "

That is enough to tell you that Loon didn't close shop because of starlink.

It is stated in the article that mobile phones became ubiquitous that telecom companies can justify the cost of setting up base stations because they can now connect thousands of people per location.

That has nothing to do with starlink.

Google TV 6 years ago

I'm on Firefox mobile for Android and I had to scroll over and over with elements moving all over the place so I abandoned it to come and read comments so I can find out what it is really about.

They're effectively saying Google is an unethical company and yet they continue to use the platform of this unethical company, a platform whose existence is solely dependent on the unethical practices of Google (as it has been mentioned over and over that Youtube is running at a loss).

It's sheer hypocrisy that makes you think you're in the right. The platform costs money to deliver content to you.

You could care less who hosts it yet you care to type YouTube.com into your address bar to find the content you want.

In any case, if you think the company doesn't deserve your money, simply don't consume videos via their platform.

If you really mean it, simply stop using the service because the more you use it, the more they retain market share and get to serve more ads to other users. So effectively, you're contributing to their growth.

Live by your word and don't use YouTube if you detest Google that much.

There's no dignity in double standards.

Off-topic, but shouldn't HN be looking at their commenting style and implementing some sort of sub-comment/ replies collapsing style a la reddit?

I collapsed the first parent comment and there's no other to read as the entire discussion now is based on that parent comment.

I think collapsing comments after a limit of replies or votes is reached will help with the contribution of new perspective to the discourse instead of everyone else following the train of thought of a single parent comment.

https://imgur.com/M4qMWog