Ah, would have loved to have seen that in the post. With that information, your post is a totally different read. Apologies.
HN user
wtpiu
K burr.
@kburr | kburr.io
Sorry for saying "douche", but depending on the tone in which he presented this idea to me, I might honestly say that. It's one thing to ask for 100 visas for YC, it's another thing to ask for 10 VCs spread across 10 different firms, and suggesting hat YC would take most of the burden of setting it up / distributing resources.
Hey, sam, great idea... how about you ask the US to give these 100 visas to ANOTHER firm first, if you really believe it. Otherwise, you sound like a selfish douche.
This is a JOKE. Let Y Combinator? Oh yeah, bro? Wow. If the US were to give ONE company this right, that would be complete bllsht. I like YC, but think before you speak.
can we stop with the atom posts, please.
atom has built-in support for git? wait, no way!
you are the man.
the api still returns information:
ah makes sense...so that mean you are projecting danilo to get 27 tonight?
your optimal lineup for today has danilo as a SF, projected to get 27+ points, but he hasn't played a game all season, and is out tonight... which makes me wonder...
what data are you using to project averages? 2012-2013 season?
Am I the only one whose link has "Authorized=false.html?"...?
Can't get to the article...
chrome can't verify authenticity of this link
not down here
Bitcoin. easy.
um you're also in an 8 person league. easy to get great players in the draft.
On the same page in terms of checking emails frequently, but not necessarily responding immediately so that I can formulate a more complete response / address it fully when I have the time. That being said, what are your thoughts when someone takes a little too long to respond? Do you actively notice when people take longer than anticipated?
or, even better, make a "second page" of HN that's more prominent (like a link in the nav), so that it's not as if there is a front page, and then several other pages, but a front page AND a second page and then the rest...therefore, articles that are in this limbo can get some extra attention, and I would assume that, having differentiated a "second page" from the following pages, people would be at least as likely (if not more) to checkout what's not on the front page.
what the heck is cod envy?