HN user
You appear to reference a link via the “[1]” but unable to find the reference you appears to be citing.
Beyond that, are you aware of any related notable research, sources, etc. - on the topic you’ve presented for additional reading or action.
Google of “what is it like to be” returns curious results:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22What+Is+It+Like+to+Be%22+...
Anyone have suggestions for further notable research on the topic?
IBM just self-publishes a bunch of these IBM brand guides under the “for dummies” brand and pays for using the “For Dummies” logo:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site:ibm.com+%22for+dummies%...
As strange as airdrops sound, they’re basically proof-of-ownership “likes” that payout if that fork does well.
China’s policies are confusing, first they wanted to move everyone to the major cities, now the cities are saying they will cap the populations.
Anyone know what is going on?
Anyone aware of any independent formal security audits of this version of this or any prior version of LUKS?
> “Shazam, the 18-year-old company...”
Fact that Shazam is 18-years-old made me curious, and found the following on Wikipedia:
> “Initially, in 2002, the service was launched only in the UK and was known as "2580", as the number was the shortcode that customers dialled from their mobile phone to get music recognised. The phone would automatically hang up after 30 seconds. A result was then sent to the user in the form of a text message containing the song title and artist name.”
Anyone that finds this interest should look at how “The Thing” (1945) worked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)
EDIT: Here are some diagrams of how it works:
Not really, easy to make an error; for example, a cube has 12 edges, but a dice with rounded edges would have an infinite set of edges.
Did you even look at the dice used in the experiment? The edges & corners are clearly rounded.
Tolerance you’re referencing relates to the distance of one side to another, not the shape of the corners; the dice you linked to have their corners rounded (aka shaved) if you look at the image.
Dice are not perfect cubes, since there edges and corners are rounded, so it would not make sense to generalize the results of dice as applying to perfect cubes.
Paper is titled, “Experimental Study of Ordering of Hard Cubes by Shearing” - does anyone have a link to the paper as a PDF?
Meaning that your assumption is that there is an optimal generalized network structure for generate a neural network as described in the paper and that as such, what is missing from the research is how to create an optimal way to generate a malformed source/target seed.
Is that correct?
Please clarify if “nop” is a typo, slang, etc.
Interested in knowing idlewords response to this since their “Security Guidelines for Congressional Campaigns” recommendation is to use the most recent iPhone with the most recent updates:
Do you mean generative adversarial networks?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_adversarial_netwo...
Apple has always had QA issues, the difference now is that they’re increasingly tested by the users, hackers, etc.
Maybe for a casual reader, but nothing is misleading about the headline unless you don’t understand how Apple’s Secure Enclave Processor (SEP) works.
For more on that, as mentioned in the linked page, there’s the “Demystifying the Secure Enclave Processor” talk from Blackhat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UNeUT_sRos
Or here’s the PDF:
https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-16/materials/us-16-Mandt-De...
To me, “if you can remember your password, it is likely not strong enough“ — conflicts with suggesting it is okay for a user to use “a six-digit key code” on their iPhone.
Any thoughts or clarifications?
> “Moreover, most of the traffic exchanged between Bitcoin nodes traverse few ISPs. Indeed, our results indicate that 60% of all possible Bitcoin connections cross 3 ISPs. In other words, 3 ISPs can see 60% of all Bitcoin traffic.”
Direct link to the paper:
Comment to me reads as a rant with a mix of false claims and requests for someone else to do the leg work.
For example, the average salary for a Pediatric Neurologist [1] within the US is higher than the average programmer salary [2].
[1] https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/pediatric-neurologist-sal...
[2] https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/programmer-salary-SRCH_KO...
For mobile users [1], quote above:
“On July 27, we reached out to Bountysource in response to a complaint we received from a user. During our investigation and discussions with members of your team, we found that your organization does not have a mechanism for responding to removal requests from users, which is required by our Terms of Service. Specifically, Bountysource does not 'respond promptly to complaints, removal requests, and do not contact requests from GitHub or GitHub Users.' Over two months later, you have not made any changes to your platform in response to our requests.
Therefore, we have suspended your application until you create a process for actively responding to all personal information removal requests, including those related to projects and issues. In order for us to remove the suspension, we would ask to see two things:
1. Confirmation from you that you have a process in place for responding to takedown requests about all areas of your website.
2. Inclusion of a public notice to your users stating how to request the removal of information. That notice can be included in your documentation or other legal notices.
Once you have that process and public notice in place, we'll be happy to review your site and consider lifting the suspension.”
[1] Please don’t use CODE-SNIPPET formatting to quote text, it is unreadable on mobile.
Assuming he still has 2%, that would mean he’s worth 707 million [1].
35,369,012,164*2%= 707,380,243
Anyone able to explain why Intel’s severity rating for this is “important” and not “critical”; meaning of the terms per Intel’s own words:
“Critical: A vulnerability, which if exploited, would allow remote execution of malicious code without user action.”
“Important: A vulnerability, which if exploited, would directly impact the confidentiality, integrity or availability of user’s data or processing resources.“
> “machine learning is all about transforming data”
There is no single right answer, but if the co-founders agreed to something, then held their choice against party making a request - that to me is a much more serious issue than the party that make the request for a higher salary.
It would be interesting to hear YC’s official position on founder salary. Anyone have a link to an official post or comment from YC?
There are clearly already sub-cultures within HN, having tags/filters would make it easier to find content.
What should be unified is the rules for contributing to HN.
Generally speaking the topic falls into the desire to have real-time/always-on data feeds that magically produce value just because they’re always producing data. That said, beyond asking the obvious, why do you need the data real-time and how much value does this produce, I do not know a better filter or means to guide a startup covering this ground.