wodow

You can't just find one hook that works and reuse it forever...

I would be interested in a study on how long popular accounts do use their one hook -- or set of hooks, or rotate them...

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Beginning..._Was_the_Co... for how Stephenson considered the essay obsolete five years later.

Something I think is often missing in this evergreen debate: governments have banned encryption before, in amateur radio. See e.g. https://ham.stackexchange.com/questions/72/encrypted-traffic...

(Obviously, the difference is in number of users -- not many hams, and lots of internet users, and "a sufficiently large difference in quantity is a difference in kind")

Does it work with Node/JS/TS front ends only, or can it work with other languages and web frameworks?

508 Resource Limit Is Reached

HN hug workaround: https://web.archive.org/web/20250711042802/https://xmlsummer...

If you haven't read and/or prefer an app format, the "Sorcery!" series was made into a wonderful set of games by Inkle in 2013: https://www.inklestudios.com/sorcery/

Thanks for taking a look.

Wikipedia pages are really just the core, and they're a good signal for "notability" given https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability

I am definitely planning to expand to more sources, both timely and less so.

Thank you! I've heard of Slow Journalism, but not Delayed Gratification, which is really beautiful.

OP here. One thing I don't have a good answer for yet: this mostly uses Wikipedia as a source. How can I pay back to volunteer editors ("Wikipedians") if this is at all successful? I've seen other sites like newsasfacts.com suggest giving a proportion of profits to the Wikimedia foundation, but obviously they are ultimately separate from the volunteer base, and its fundraising appears increasingly controversial [1, 2].

I slightly balk at the idea, but is a cryptocurrency token possibly the answer? Generate, distribute to editors and have donations come inbound somehow? I see the dangers here!

[1] https://unherd.com/newsroom/the-next-time-wikipedia-asks-for... [2] https://slate.com/technology/2022/12/wikipedia-wikimedia-fou...

Are you able to say more on your startup story, through the exit?

By George, ItsMattyG is right! After editing a question (with the "stylus"/pen icon), the revision number counter that appears (e.g. "1 / 2") has arrows next to it that allow forward and backward navigation through the new branches.

This was surprisingly undiscoverable. I wonder if it's documented. I couldn't find anything from a quick look at help.openai.com .

* The main thing that makes ChatGPTs ui useful to me is the ability to change any of my prompts in the conversation & it will then go back to that part of the converation and regenerate, while removing the rest of the conversation after that point.

Agreed, but what I would also really like (from this and ChatGPT) would be branching: take a conversation in two different ways from some point and retain the seperate and shared history.

I'm not sure what the UI should be. Threads? (like mail or Usenet)

Their "Appendix: Memory Safe Languages" lists:

C#, Go, Java, Python, Rust & Swift

Found at https://blog.paulhankin.net/fibonacci/

For a narrower but deeper treatment of violence (and war) alone, Pinker's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Better_Angels_of_Our_Natur... is well worth a read.

Anthropic at https://x.com/anthropicai/status/1709986949711200722

The fact that most individual neurons are uninterpretable presents a serious roadblock to a mechanistic understanding of language models. We demonstrate a method for decomposing groups of neurons into interpretable features with the potential to move past that roadblock.

The author does refer to Elixir further down:

UPD: Erlang/Elixir seem to be doing the right thing, too.

I don't think I'm alone in considering blinking keyboard cursor/carets as the original sin of this.

Here's an long-running collection of how to disable flashing cursors everywhere, from vi to Vscode: https://jurta.org/en/prog/noblink

Software development is not an easy task, and often after a painful process of writing a program developers feel they should share their pains with users, so they put a part of own sufferings onto the shoulders of users in a method similar to the Chinese water torture - blinking cursors.

What I would love to be standard in all product launches like this would be to have a mailing list per integration or, as with this, programming language.

I want to be able to drop my email address and only hear back when support for $MY_FAVE_LANG is available.

Provenance of this reviewed at http://www.proudlyserving.com/archives/2005/08/dos_aint_done... (and last discussed here at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10432608 )

I believe the main article ends at the "Share" button, then there's a separate ad or section about the educational models.

Looks like they changed the on-page title sometime today: http://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://g147.medi...

I really like the term "Sugary Functional Style" -- sweetening pure functional programming with faux procedurality.

Looks like it's a (three word) Google Whack at the time of writing: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Sugary%20Functional...

I believe OP is working on https://www.superusapp.com/ , "A Visual Workspace For All Content and Tools"

It's their only other post on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=zhangruinan

They discuss it at https://medium.superus.space/my-ideal-solution-to-informatio...

Looks very nice. Are you planning on releasing native mobile app versions?

Is anyone who has tried both this and Forest Admin able to give a comparison of feature sets?

The link posted here is to a Supabase-specific landing page.

Their main home page doesn't mention Supabase: https://www.getmotoradmin.com/

I believe Apple's Mail.app doesn't without some third-party tooling. Suggestive: https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/229472/macmail-for... (five years old)

Could this get the same kind of backlash as Recipeasly.com earlier this year? [1, 2]

Should it?

I realise Recipeasly was republishing stripped recipe content (search-indexably). Is that a sufficient difference?

[1] Twitter announcement and thread: https://twitter.com/redman/status/1366137187117506560

[2] Mainstream news blow-up: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26311101

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/who-we-are/public-records/