wilg

It boggles the mind. One would think this is some highly secretive technology only a dozen people in the world have access to, the way one has to argue tooth and nail about trivially verifiable facts regarding it.

Hahaha, I love this. The people on HN are living in some kind of bizarro world where AI is totally useless and also I guess only tried it in 2022 or something.

It's an esoteric philosophical question that has no truth value either way.

Slavery was about racism and power and control, not economics. Slavery is bad for the economy!

https://www.nber.org/papers/w31758

https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/nations-dont-get-rich-by-plund...

Fully 50% of HN front page posts and comments are this now.

Could the article "The Stack" the user was looking for have been 'What is "the stack"?' by Julia Evans?

https://web.archive.org/web/20160305142512/https://jvns.ca/b...

Making things up is only really a common issue on the non-thinking models which nobody should be using. The regular chatbots are Autogooglers and are very useful for research. This is just not a good argument anymore.

Edit: Guys, why are we downvoting this? Does no one use like ChatGPT or Claude and understand how it works? Do you all think its regularly hallucinating links still? Is everyone on HN using like free signed out accounts or something? What year is it?

Can you just say the point you're trying to make about nonprofits directly?

There's no law saying you can't start a non-profit healthcare provider or insurance company. Why not do it?

Do you suppose thats why they wrote "principally"?

Isn't that typically because they have lower labor costs? Not sure that applies as much to AI.

Well one way you can understand why the poster finds it controversial would be to read it before commenting.

It does exactly that.

This is a common coping mechanism, but the US is quite democratic and almost any objection you have about corporate control or whatnot can be easily overridden by getting like 100,000 more people to agree with you.

True sometimes, but not always. It's unlikely dumb people are equally split between political parties.

The US has below average middle class tax rates. But luckily we can just choose what our tax dollars are spent on through democracy! The main problem is nobody agrees about anything and lots of people are really dumb and can't handle the responsibility of electing competent people into government.

We are not in a recession, and we (if you mean the US) recovered our economy from COVID (under Biden).

The "long tailpipe" concept is outdated and incorrect.

Technically I think it uses something called OpenAI OWL not Electron https://openai.com/index/building-chatgpt-atlas/ (which they extracted from Atlas, but the new app mentions it in the about window)

Presumably there are some features in the old app that will be migrated to the new app or dropped. Seems fine.

They briefly put the turn signals on the wheel which is not amazing but they’re back on the stalk now.

AC is not an issue IMO. It’s always in the same place on the screen, on auto, and I never touch it really.

That’s a physical button.

Maybe, but some political narratives are good and right and true, and others are bad and wrong and false. (I am not joking: objective reality exists and most of politics isn't subjective.)

I'm pretty sure that's a major part of this announcement? It delegates to GPT 5.5 which then uses tools.

Tesla arguably has better, more useful, and more obvious physical buttons than most cars. Most car manufacturers spray confusing physical buttons everywhere with esoteric icons and insane UX. Everything you'd want to do as a driver in a Tesla has a physical button or a set it and forget it "auto" mode.

It might be a good regulation but it is definitely not essential!

All of those things can be recycled and almost all of them can be replaced whether or not its end-user-servicable.

All but Tesla and Rivian I think.

It's also possible its not a conspiracy and you and the other poster just have different opinions.

You don't get to choose how a particular movie was funded and who agreed to pay who in exchange for what.

That's false. You actually do pay the creators by buying their work like 99% of the time. Pretending you're fighting business structure around art financing is pure cope.