what

Why do you care to unstar such repos?

Why do you have any of that installed on your personal phone? Don’t do that and you won’t get notifications after you clock out.

Not even my telecom operator knows that!

They sure do and certainly know who is within 100ft of you at any given time.

An LLM isn’t a source. If someone wanted to hear what an LLM had to offer on the topic, they would have asked it themselves. And they probably did before asking you.

Sending that “lazy answer” because you assumed the other person hasn’t tried solving the question themselves seems like the “uncivil” action. You should probably assume your colleague has tried before asking for help, and probably tried the same lazy route you used to respond.

An open book test would only be given where the book is the reference material and would be considered correct? It’s more like saying you can google the answers and you blindly trust the SEO slop in the first result.

So, if people's experience is with modern LLMs, they are being rational to accept that the answers as likely correct.

They are not.

But also wtf is a “modern” LLM? This is totally unhinged, every complaint about an LLM is always responded to with “you’re just using one from two months ago, it’s totally different now”. Repeat every two months for the same complaints.

They said to ban AI usage in dating (sites, I assume)?

Looks like a standard 6 ring binder and standard paper sizes. You can probably buy the refills from anywhere.

That was my point?

it operates in Texas if it is serving Texas users

Nonsense.

There is no reliable way to not serve your content to people in Texas. If anything, Texas should compel ISPs to not serve it to their Texas customers.

Texas isn’t the US government?

Why are scuff marks assumed to be from shoes? Why not bags/briefcases hitting the wall while leaning against it? Might explain the “implausibly tall”.

You can write tests that cover every line/branch without actually verifying the code does what it’s supposed to. Relying on (unreviewed?) LLM written tests that provide coverage may not be a great idea.

And it shows!

They could be. But you’re delusional if you think people don’t shit on grok because of the association to Elon. Or it’s just a shitty model, who knows.

There was a single mention of nodejs (and also python). But I doubt this person read the article.

Are you saying the machine can tell you what confused them?

Why are you asking an LLM what could have been better or was confusing? It literally has no idea.

People flying kites?

The last one isn’t negative because of AI but because of grok/elon.

HN, which has an anti-AI bent

In what world are you living? 90% of the front page is AI.

Can you show us the 10s of features you’re releasing daily now?

So neither you, nor your daughter, have any experience with the issue?

Huh? The task was to write a frame to a specific file, your workflow failed.

You probably shouldn’t be committing things that are broken…

Shouldn’t that be the case for comments too then?

Why are you asking the LLM to commit? Can’t you do that yourself?

Why are you having it commit or write commit messages unless you have no idea what it’s doing?

and then I ask it

Why? It has no idea why it does what it does…