HN user
No, try reading it again.
"a legal "Research Chemical" with effects similar to MDMA (Methylone/bk-MDMA)"
Someone that is quick to assume without reading could easily make this mistake.. there are my research chemicals that are not technically categorized and not MDMA.
Read about Sasha to start https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Shulgin
Survivorship bias... many people don't, the stories of the few that do are impressive and worthy of hearing.
"id pay to watch mkbhd" to "fuck that smartphone reviewer guy, dont give a shit about him and hope he gets hit by a bus"
That escalated quickly... Are you ok?
Absolute values matter more IMO. Any time people use % or per capita, it means they live in a city. I see this quite often, and it's just a way to skew rhetoric.
Just my opinion.
Texas produces more wind and solar than any other state, what are you talking about?
"Plenty"
Plenty of people stick things in their butt and go to the emergency room. So what.
You are the one using the term woke, it's no where in the article.
The only people using these terms with regards to solar is terminally online people or people who watch 24/7 news.
Texas has more solar capacity than California, does that make Texas woke?
Do you realize you are part of the global culture war by posting your comment?
Did you know Texas produces more solar energy than California? https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05032026/inside-clean-ene...
FB finally got me with this. I refused to install any social media apps, but had to get messenger as I was missing important messages. So it's the only one I have.
I think it's more like 7500 to 2800.
Because AI models can create other ones and the weights/training data is what models. So you can hoard data, but not the models.
I think the point is that it is his OPs opinion and they cannot read the future. Nobody here can, so the reply has just as much weight as the original.
So saving and living below means is a great strategy either way.
That [getting banned] doesn't tell you anything really, they probably just thought you were a troll.
I get banned from subs sometimes by just asking a opposing question.
If you were going to write a article or print a magazine cover , you might want to know this.
You could also take the other side to hedge some risk. It's up to them to define the value, not you for them.
There is very little we do that is "needed" if you break it down to actual necessities (basic needs pyramid).
How can the average citizen who knows nothing about engineering/technology determine that their electric bill [as the result of a new datacenter in town] won't go up as truthful or falsehood?
Welcome to Zen.
I thought centrist stayed in the center, but left or right moves far in one direction. So in relatively speaking, you maybe right, but not absolutely.
It read to me like a post mortem on why she failed [opposite of success]. She failed because she was bad at changing the culture which is a core competency of leadership. It doesn't really matter what the people think one way or another, the job of a leader is to lead, "win hearts and minds"
This seems pretty self evident.
I still fail to see how carjacking rates are Kia's fault. I mean, Did carjackings increase everywhere relative to the % of kia's on the road in every area (urban and rural)?
The flip side I've heard is that LE doesn't arbitrarily slow down arrests due to a difference in ideology. It seems more simple than that. Who wants to go through the effort of making arrests if the DA is letting them free. The LEO will see them commit the same event the next day. I don't think anyone would want that in their day to day job, much less law & order.
It's like writing a PR/MR every day [by hand] and having it declined every day, eventually you stop.
So it's not enough to say that the progressive ideology is a bad plan in that environment? You said it yourself, there isn't any plan. What happens in complicated high risk situations when there is no plan? You end up with bad results, which is a result of the failed ideology.
Ok, I agree if that is your hypothetical. But we have t define "if its happening" and what "everyone is more sick" means relative to before microplastics, or whatever your argument is.
I get your point, just disagree that more people are sick now (depending on the definition of sick). If you die, you're not sick anymore.
Create a family: Pursue a life that brings others happiness, serve them.
What do you mean you don't understand the goal? The goal for you or for humanity?
The goal is to figure it out for yourself and add meaning, to help your friends and family, the people you love and support.
For humanity, there is no goal, its for each to figure this out. There never was or will be. This isn't Star Trek.
Zen doesn't have to be a religion, it can be whatever you want it to be.
You are still stretching, nobody is claiming suffering doesn't exist.
But to compare modern medical care and nutrition to even 100-200 years ago and say it was better in the past is quite... insane.
You can't cherrypick specific problems now and then compare to the entire existence in whatever before times you think were better.
To put it another way... I would easily trade being below average income/class now, to top 1% 200 years ago every single time.
We may be able the war on drugs has ended or not on how you define it.
The nancy ragean area levels , i would say yes. Rates are down. https://drugabusestatistics.org/drug-related-crime-statistic...
However, it certainly hasn't gone to 0 and is still quite high.
When it no longer becomes science and becomes social. There are MANY examples, even in this thread, of this happening.