vlan121

But to support the big models here: the human was the factor that caused this circumstance. A human wanted these tests, a human shut down the guard rails that should prevent sth. like this.

A US-Company attacking another US-Company, while the open chinese model helps in the forensics what a time to live.

IKEA was cool years ago. Unfortunately the quality reduced enormously and the price raised over it. Yesterday I saw an ad for a table and chairs for the balcony: 70€ (80$ after tax). I bought this model years ago and paid 15€ (17.60$ after tax) for the whole set.

The ai training data flag

Thanks!

Changelog: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/releases

Performance is worse than Opus 4.8: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5

This is one of the core principles of How To Win Friends And Influence People (Dale Carnegie). Since Ive read I tried to apply this rule. It works.

Why a shell company in Stockholm?

Maybe this is the line, we'll hit eventually. Maybe the models become smarter, but the context will sit.

Reversly viewed ones should ask with what intend the study should be like this. And for obvious reasons it sounds like monetary-nature.

I was unable to find the paper. I'm still wondering, if it is a cross-over experiment, as:

The circles were in different positions at each room in the maze, but the bees still learned over varying amounts of time to fly toward the short flash of light associated with the sweet food.

Do not state, if the light suddenly changed in the rooms. If not, other factors might come into place.

I mostly lucked out. 2-3 accounts surfaced over the many things I saw and they seemed to prove they knew things. For example, one of these accounts posted things 2-4 years before an event would occur that ended up coming true. As if they knew ahead of time what would happen, as if they were part of intelligence or government or who knows what. A different account created software that predicted the future and many of the things they posted ended up coming true too.

We have to be cautious here, it's drifting towards conspiracy theories, my post is not innocent in this regard. But apart from that, I have to agree with you.

In many areas, I don't fully understand. I use a simple trick that worked well: [phrase-redacted]. Intellectually honest people who aren't trying to trick anyone speak the truth. They also speak it with simple words so there's no possibility of misinterpretation.

So not taking a look at the chain of thoughs but treating each sentence differently, makes sense.

This might be the most effective trick. Many times I caught people say something which is their opinion, and which is false based on data I have, that is actually an attempt to express a fact they know in a way that will make them seem more important, or give them more attention, or I don't know what.

Seems like philosophical razor

On the other hand, a social credit system may be a distraction from an actual credit system already in place: a money system.

That is very true.

I follow content from accounts that seem to consistently post facts. How do you really distinguish that? Sourcing is a way to proof your facts. But creating a net of sources is in times of AI not hard. If there are timestamps one factor could be time stamps, and I really found sources that all have been published within a week or a month making it shady.

I try to understand what is actually being stated instead of what is implied; facts vs opinion That requires that you understand fully to implication, how do you do this in areas that you don't have strong background knowledge?

I wouldn't be surprised if falsity starts to get penalized. Elon said Grok will start to rank content based on whether its true. That would be a great step.

Also built a system that prevents posting things that are made up. Maybe posting lies should carry a penalty, where you deposit something to lose if you told a lie. We must be careful here that a social credit system is not created through the back door.

SocialFocus offers so much more than just shorts :-)

Security 101: * Kerckhoff Principle of Open Design Security of a mechanism should not depend on the secrecy of its design or implementation.

I dont know about this. You can look up a video on YouTube but when you search for valid sources I just find magazines I never heard of. Is there a valid source?

Looks like this, like someone is rebranding pagination.

The goal of economic is not to reach AGI. It would solve the problems we have with the current market, therefore would it make less money, then to just "chase" for the AGI. Shirky principle in a nutshell.

Awesome, I was going back and forth with LLMs trying to keep a conversation up. You guys managed to channel those process, I think I will love this app!

Mojos compiler is closed source. Thats a big no-no

I had a different title. It was somehow changed to the name of the repository.

I was leaving this one out, seems like a gag when you read it :D

when the shit hits the fan, this seems like the product.

'The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.' — ̶S̶̶o̶̶c̶̶r̶̶a̶̶t̶̶e̶̶s̶ ̶ (Kenneth John Freeman, 1907 [thanks to morsch])

That remains speculative. However, voice offers many more dimensions than simply writing on a smartphone—your pitch, speed, and eloquence all serve as potential inputs for algorithms. The ability to always agree with the user, learn from their behavior, and provide only the answers they want to hear is a real possibility.

Thanks for your input! Your question is indeed not easy to answer. To give you my perspective on these aspects, I should mention that I grew up in Germany. In Germany, social networking primarily takes place through associations. If you come to Germany as a foreigner, the best thing you can do is join a sports club.

When I think about how I joined back then, without a smartphone or the internet, it was mostly by coincidence—running into someone at school or in the neighborhood who was already active in a club. The schedules were always strictly fixed, so there was no need for organization via group chats or social media.

One thing that stands out to me is the importance of volunteerism. In Germany, the majority of civil protection services, including the fire department and disaster relief, are managed by volunteers. Professional firefighters are actually a minority. I joined the youth fire department at a young age, and I stayed because it was simply what we always did. We regularly organized big festivals, and many people attended. These events were a great way to get people excited about what we were doing, and often, they would say, “Hey, I want to do this too!”

I'll check out the movie, and I’ll also read Bowling Alone, which is mentioned in this context. It all sounds like structural problems that we also face in Germany. Civil protection services are increasingly struggling with a lack of new recruits, which aligns with the themes of the movie. People often say they don’t want to commit too strongly to one thing anymore.

I love how you highlight the dual-use dilemma of technology. You’re absolutely right—it all comes down to how technology is used. Regarding radioactivity: most countries strictly prohibit private individuals from handling radioactive materials. Even though some nations possess nuclear weapons, we haven’t reached a point where everyone has unrestricted access to radioactivity and can harm themselves—unlike social media and its algorithms, which are far less regulated.

Sensationalist methods only address the symptoms, not the root cause. I agree with you here—trying to recapture students’ attention with sensational tactics isn’t a real solution.

Regarding the opium of the people: Karl Marx touched on two key ideas that apply: comfort and relief, alongside illusion and passivity.

When it comes to comfort and relief, likes, comments, and shares on social media create a sense of recognition and belonging. And yes, personalized content acts as an escape from reality—a kind of painkiller that distracts us from real problems. It’s even more troubling because this “drug” is tailored specifically to each individual.

I definitely see the parallels here. However, I’m not convinced that breaking away from this “religion” of social media requires communism, even though Karl Marx was a brilliant thinker. The present shows that, even within existing systems, people can detach themselves from such structures.

You haven't read the whole thing. It says that: or that could benefit generative AI.

Julian Assange, long time no hear.

Infact this is a problem that we'll face someday.