HN user

vinckr

167 karma

shilling Ory (https://github.com/ory) since '19 email: vincent@ory.sh personal blog: https://vinckr.com/

Posts8
Comments74
View on HN

Tickets cannot be moved between trackers

You can convert an issue to a discussion and vice versa, so no duplication is needed and your notification should be preserved.

Or do you mean something else?

Mistral OCR 3 7 months ago

after clicking on your link I browsed twitter for a minute and damn that place has become weird (or maybe it always was?)

These are fair concerns, and I want to clarify what's included versus what's paid.

The confusion here is about two different types of SSO:

_Admin SSO (for managing Ory itself)_ - Ory is fundamentally an API. For self-hosted deployments, you control access however you want - through your infrastructure, reverse proxy, or using Ory Polis. This is not gated.

_Organizations SSO (for your end users)_ - This is the paid feature. It allows your B2B customers to bring their own identity provider. If you're building a SaaS product and BigCorp wants their employees to authenticate using Okta or Azure AD, Organizations handles that federation.

The distinction matters because maintaining integrations with enterprise IDPs is continuous work. For example Google randomly changes their OIDC implementation on a Saturday evening. Someone needs to wake up and fix that. For products serving other businesses at scale, that operational burden is real.

Organizations is one of the few areas where we charge, specifically targeting the B2B SaaS use case. If you're self-hosting for internal use or building a consumer product, you don't need Organizations. If you're selling to enterprises that require SSO, you're generating revenue to support the cost.

Another problem is also that "standards" like OAuth2/OIDC are used for a thousand use cases that weren't intended by the authors, so people get really creative with them. Plus the spec itself is vague on many essential things, for example how logout should work. Thankfully I never had to implement SAML but I would guess it's even worse there...

You can use other parts of the Ory ecosystem to add these features, such as Ory Polis for SAML/SCIM support: https://github.com/ory/polis

CAPTCHAs aren’t a big help anymore in my personal opinion, but you can easily integrate them on the frontend when using Kratos. The commercial offering just bundles all of this out of the box for you.

If Keycloak fits your needs well and you see no room for improvement, that’s perfectly fine; by all means use what works best for you.

sure, I would say its mostly correct. You can solve Permissions and API Gateway also differently - for example many use OAuth2 claims and scopes for permissions. I personally think that isn't good practice - like "first-party auth" I think its outside of the scope that OAuth2 was built for originally - but it works and many are used to building authz that way. You could also use the identity metadata on Kratos for permissions - this works well for simple RBAC usecases but if you want "large scale" and "finegrained" something like Ory Keto is probably the more reasonable choice.

Feel free to message me on the Ory Community Slack if you want to discuss further: https://slack.ory.com/

that's fair! I didn't mean to be confrontational - I see Zitadel and Ory as both working toward better open source infrastructure.

At Ory, features like high-availability setups, zero-downtime upgrades, large scale multi-tenancy, and formal SLAs are part of the commercial offering. In most cases, if you’re not operating Ory at large enterprise scale, you won’t need those.

It’s a reasonable tradeoff: the commercial offering covers the costs of maintaining those capabilities and helps fund continued open source development. Big organizations that rely on Ory in production should ideally help sustain the ecosystem they depend on.

It depends what your requirements are.

If you are "just" doing first-party login, session, and user mgmt then Ory Kratos is all you need. I would say in the majority of cases you would be fine with just Ory Kratos.

If you want 3rd party integrations, or become an IDP (think "login with $yourcorp"), or you migrate an existing system that relies on OAuth2 that you want to keep, or you have more complex auth flows where OAuth2 shines, then you want Ory Hydra.

If you want a "fine-grained" global, centralized authz system, complex and scalable authz as described by Google Zanzibar, then you want Ory Keto.

If you want to support SAML as well, you want Ory Polis.

If you want a "zero trust" setup, then you want Ory Oathkeeper.

That being said in almost all cases Kratos will be fine and you can pick and choose what you actually need.

Hey Dan, appreciate the discussion!

Ory’s setup is indeed true multi-region active-active; not just sharded or active-passive failover. Each region runs a full stack capable of handling both read and write operations, with global data consistency and locality guarantees.

We’ll soon publish a case study with a customer that uses this setup that goes deeper into how Ory handles multi-region deployments in production (latency, data residency, and HA patterns). It’ll include some of the technical details missing from that earlier blog post you linked. Keep an eye out!

There are also some details mentioned here: https://www.ory.com/blog/personal-data-storage

For me the normal video recommendations are awesome on Youtube, I regularly find very obscure super interesting stuff in my recommendations.

For shorts it is abysmal, I only get horrible recommendations there - no idea why it is so different.