HN user

veritas

410 karma
Posts83
Comments128
View on HN
deputy-dog.com 18y ago

10 brilliant office interiors

veritas
4pts1
www.stageleftstudios.com 18y ago

Thoughts on Disqus and Intense Debate

veritas
1pts0
www.techcrunch.com 18y ago

TechStars: Intense Debate launches open beta.

veritas
1pts0
www.youtube.com 18y ago

The Information Revolution

veritas
2pts0
irei.wordpress.com 18y ago

OpenID Sucks.

veritas
13pts7
www.telegraph.co.uk 18y ago

The coming dollar collapse?

veritas
5pts4
uk.techcrunch.com 18y ago

Google Buys Jaiku.

veritas
14pts1
www.wallstrip.com 18y ago

Wallstrip chats with Tariq Krim.

veritas
1pts0
news.ycombinator.com 19y ago

Technical Question...

veritas
1pts3
news.ycombinator.com 19y ago

FanState.com Launches: YCNews thoughts?

veritas
8pts28
blog.leetsoft.com 19y ago

The Secret to Memcached

veritas
13pts1
www.techcrunch.com 19y ago

Microsoft Launches Popfly: Mashup App Creator Built On Silverlight

veritas
10pts8
mashable.com 19y ago

How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions

veritas
1pts0
sethgodin.typepad.com 19y ago

Seth's Blog: Blow up your home page

veritas
1pts0
www.techcrunch.com 19y ago

Google To Launch Cross-Language Search Engine

veritas
1pts0
news.ycombinator.com 19y ago

Iminlikewithyou invites here (All out)

veritas
1pts13
www.economist.com 19y ago

Tech.view | Criminalising the consumer | Economist.com

veritas
4pts0
ririanproject.com 19y ago

10 Golden Lessons From Steve Jobs

veritas
12pts1
www.techcrunch.com 19y ago

SplashCast Expands Media Player

veritas
1pts0
mashable.com 19y ago

YouTube Launches Active Share

veritas
3pts1
gigaom.com 19y ago

GigaOM: Why Hollywood suddenly loves tech?

veritas
2pts0
www.foundread.com 19y ago

Knowing When to 'Whack It'! - Found+READ

veritas
2pts0
www.techcrunch.com 19y ago

Cozmo Wants to Kill Your TV

veritas
3pts0
paul.kedrosky.com 19y ago

Paul Kedrosky: VC Investing Factoids from Q1

veritas
5pts3
sethgodin.typepad.com 19y ago

Seth's Blog: The brand formula

veritas
1pts0
tutorialblog.org 19y ago

Links for Web Designers : April

veritas
4pts2
kuler.adobe.com 19y ago

Awesome color schemes for web designers.

veritas
26pts11
www.techcrunch.com 19y ago

ImageKind Scores Partnership With Flickr

veritas
4pts0
gigaom.com 19y ago

GigaOM: Why eBay wants Stumbleupon

veritas
2pts0
www.techcrunch.com 19y ago

eBay Acquiring StumbleUpon

veritas
15pts9

>Bank holding companies are subject to risk-based capital requirements which prohibit them from operating with high leverage or purchasing large amounts of risky assets.

I figured the capital requirements would indeed get stricter (I believe the article also mentions this), but I'm still skeptical as to how long the banks can rein in their greed. Capital requirements should technically force them to be more careful, but IIRC the big 5 had already managed to get their requirements increased before (from 12:1 to 40:1).

As for mergers alleviating risk, would it not also expose the system to a different risk: market consolidation? The reason given for the current bailouts is that if these handful of investment banks (or even just AIG for that matter) failed it would set off a catastrophe. If there were more consolidation wouldn't it just aggravate this risk of one failure causing a significant impact?

Like I said before, I'm not an economist, but it seems better to keep the WaMu's and Goldman Sachs' separate, in more or less mutually exclusive risk pools so that if GS fails, the deposits in WaMu don't go with it.

Anyway, good points! I'm sure if handled correctly the situation will work since it does seem to work elsewhere.

Disclaimer: not an economist.

My understanding is that the Glass Steagall act in the 1930s was passed to separate holding banks (like WaMu etc) and investment banks (GS) because when they were combined certain risks popped up.

One of the first that immediately comes to mind is that now investment banks will be in charge of deposits. Securities trading is pretty risky (especially when you're leveraged) and if something should happen (tech bubble or the current mess) then the deposits are threatened. Since deposits are also insured by the government (FDIC), the government then is automatically on the hook for the money.

This means that there is a need for new restrictions placed on the hybrid banks. If the regulation is too low, then we run the risk of putting deposits in danger. If the regulation is too much, we run the risk of crippling the investment banking industry.

Then again other countries seem to work fine without such separation, so hopefully this will work out. From the article it seems new regulations will be imposed on the banks.

If anyone else has additional insight, feel free to correct me :)

What are you talking about? DHH and 37signals provide a lot to the conversation, including differing points of view.

If having a different opinion means "contributing nothing positive" then we've fallen a long, long way.

Edit: fixed grammar.

I'm not sure of the checkout system, but I assume right now that the payments are left for the sellers and buyers to deal with and Etsy would instead like to establish their own system that makes it dead easy to buy and sell with Etsy as the middle man in the transaction.

Search is hard. They have search already, but they want it make it better and more relevant to the user's taste and buying history I imagine.

Customer Service => manpower => salaries => money => funding.

Competitive wages: I'm sure Etsy pays it's employees well, but I doubt it's at market value (although it's probably damn close). But they want to take care of their existing employees and hire new ones and pay them all well, which I think is admirable.

The funding isn't absurd. Etsy can and probably will be huge. I've seen nothing from their execution and growth so far that indicates that they're a mirage or about to tank.

For a company with a revenue model, growth, and a large market to raise a 30 million series B isn't exactly earth shattering.

"Sooner or later Valleywag will write something particularly informative or amusing and Hacker News readers will miss out."

Because in the off chance that Valleywag writes this informative and insightful article, we won't have access to it through any other source. It's not like we have access to a medium that enables efficient propagation of information.

The base jQuery is very light, perhaps half the size of Prototype if I recall correctly.

The added bloat comes from the effects and UI libraries. The UI library is probably superfluous so that should cut the size significantly.

Yep, the background color. It's a little dull, but that's just my personal preference. So I don't know what other feedback you've gotten, but take what I say with a grain of salt.

EDIT:

Also on pages like this one: http://disqus.com/people/danielha the text of the comment and the box on the right (points, replies) overlap sometimes. Minor quirk, but work getting fixed.

And you might want to make the green arrow (on hover) a bit more noticeable... kinda like the red arrow for voting down.

Sorry for all the cosmetic feedback, but I haven't gotten around to creating an account to give technical feedback/bugs.

Interesting... IntenseDebate also launched today.

TechStars and YC are neck and neck in this space.

To the Disqus guys:

1. On your home page, the logo should be clickable.

2. The logo should always take me back to the home page... sometimes it dumps me in the Disqus forum.

3. The paging links say "Next Next", instead of just "Next"

4. It's probably just me, but the background puts me off a little.

Well true, but the same can be said about Apple, Google etc. They all have significant revenue streams outside the US. The reason most people try to explain away Microsoft's ridiculous profits is because they don't like the company.

For Microsoft, the key in my opinion, is their next version of the OS. Vista blows and is selling simply through computer sales. They need to rebuild their OS from the ground up to be secure, fast and user friendly.

OpenID Sucks. 19 years ago

Haha, no worries dude. Your criticism was spot on and appreciated.

I don't usually submit my own writings to YC (first time I believe).

OpenID Sucks. 19 years ago

I'll own up to it :)

It was a 5 minute rant to be honest, not a well thought out exposition on OpenID's various shortcomings.

So, apologies if it was inarticulate/verbose. I really should clean it up and edit before I submit to YC.

I modded you up BTW :D

Fair point. YC exists not to be on your board or help run the business, but to help you get to the people that will do those things. Which, I consider, to be a valuable service.

Have you had any contact with Sequoia? If so, what are they like?