at a deeper level it does
HN user
unwoundmouse
throwaway email: throwaway15132@gmail.com
lets you decide who to trust to have the power to approve chargebacks instead of defacto trusting the fed
zelle v̶e̶n̶m̶o̶ cashapp revolut ach wire ...
and if you're concerned about centralization
ethereum solana cosmos avalanche fantom monero aptos polygon ...
What did you use for UI, is this tailwind? looks really clean
this take is actually kind of neat
that would actually be pretty interesting lol
I use copilot, it's much more useful than you'd expect. Really helpful for places where you would normally need to record a small macro, copilot can infer the completions easily
I think the question boils down to do you believe the employee is obligated to disclose the backup issue within the responsibility of the employment contract? I would say no, since the entire creation of the software was not within the responsibility of the contract, why would the documentation of the backup issue be within it?
I think the situation is analogous to the company giving the employee a big unwarranted pay raise, and then the employee lazily not doing more work, then the company firing the employee, but then arguing that at a minimum, the company has a reasonable professional courtesy to give the employee hours for their vacation days, even though it isn't specified within the contract.
I'm also curious about the rigor of this argument, don't know why you've been downvoted
Hi, I'm interested! Happy to deanonymize over email
What is the reasoning behind why Fibonacci retracements should work? Did you backtest it?
Yeah this doesn't make sense to me either. If you assume the gas rights for all the land on the earth is priced that low (it isn't) you could buy all it for $1mm.
Also, I can't imagine the seller would be like "hmm, this guy wants to buy gas rights on 87,000 hectares of land for $1. Sounds like a good deal!" without thinking maybe there was something special and investigated for themselves first.
Yeah that's how all centralized crypto exchanges do it
eFfiCiEnT MaRkEt HyPoThEsIs
sixQuarks 2 hours ago [–]
Anyone wanna bet me that Tesla will be first to full level 5 self driving?
lol nice way of not betting
Do macros -> delete % break it? I tried to race the first exercise by setting up a macro to speedrun the first example and i got something where multiple % showed up
This looks dope! What UI framework did you use?
I have to ask, why would Trump make the time to do this with only a few days remaining in office? The only conclusion I come to based off an understanding of his persona is that he is doing insider trading
elon will reincarnate into XÆA-12
Agreed, the original comment doesn't really provide value to the reader - it mostly just states the memo thing, and then the opinion that stripe has lots of verticals to expand into
Jesus y'all are so cynical, commenting on how these are war bots and gonna automate everything away, I just think it's an engineering marvel that these insanely complex robotic maneuvers can be done so fluidly now
I've been thinking about this problem for a little bit. I think an app idea that has potential is a sort of 'wikipedia for manga translation'. Essentially you have some automated translator do a first pass, create rough translations. This is served to customers. All the readers, then, have the ability to move around the overlayed speech bubbles and edit the text inside them. For the most part, automated translation seems to capture a lot of high level stuffs, and the large number of community participants can fill in the details/broken translations using context, and additionally do whatever cleaning needs to be done.
Doing some guestimation, it seems like you could fit an exabyte into an AWS snowmobile. That's insane
They don't have great legal grounds to attack bitcoin imo, only threat to national security or treason or some bs
Respect
Damn I didn't realize that ant design could look so clean
I was shocked by your "people remember 20% of what they read vs 80% of what they see" statistic. I followed chain of sources, which led to a broken hp page [1]. It looks like HP pulled this number out of their ass [2]. Making a claim without a source is one thing; making a claim with a false source is another. This sort of practice is very damaging to the authenticity of information on the internet.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20111117203151/http://www.hp.com...
[2] https://policyviz.com/2015/10/21/more-statistical-fallacies/
Does that matter? My understanding is that the groups are a random sample so it should be unbiased estimator of the true pop
False actually. This study states that the isoflavones in soy don’t affect serum T levels.
https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00966-2/full...