HN user

ukuuru

15 karma
Posts0
Comments12
View on HN
No posts found.

People are not looking for preserverance, they are looking for consumption. Today most of the "content" is created for consumption rather than as creative and artistic endavours. This is why there are recipies for content making like Netflix recipie despite they have some creative movies and series here and there most of their movies and shows follows a strict recipie.

A pretty effective genocide and cleansing campaign. Bomb crowded camps, target valuable people who glues the people together, doctors, academicians, engineers. Watch the society disintegrates.

Human level AI is unlikely but near human level will do just like every other prodcut engineered to do its thing around us. In theory a programmable entity that feels would have infinite applications but an entity that can quantize feelings can cover lets say 90% of those applications.

Despite the article is on US data, it is no different in other countries, which many of them don't have the structures regularly held responsible for in the US. It is by the nature of the very system we have in common; central government. Law enforcement is primary goal of police, not crime prevention, it is nuanced and magnified in practice by the sophistication of our societies and more grift nature of everyday violent crimes.

They have pulled airpods as a "norm". In olden times leaving your earphones/headphones in you ear/head was a very rude thing to do, especially around people you know, in idle time; now it is almost norm. Especially it is marketed as a norm to the younger folk. They will try and there is no reason them to fail.

I believe it is about the audience, they are very casual about killing products. The users of the Reader was people with interest and influence in technology. Killing a product that is utilized by the people with the higher influence created no good.