tyre

Yes. I bought a Samsung TV and there isn’t a way to set up Art Mode without the internet. So first you have to get a raspberry pi, install pi hole, then switch your router’s DNS.

What a wild experience 2026 is. But I do feel like a wizard.

Reading the chain of thought for Fable, it is incredulous as well. It keeps thinking that it must be missing something or that this is a trick, because it can't have just found a counterexample to a famous conjecture. It's just like us!

https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/EA1E99C3DAE99/media%2FHNpQX...

https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/3B5C0B867A7C3/media%2FHNpQU...

One would presume that the founder is investing their money into something, probably equities, that is an investment in industry. They could be either selling those equities for a loan here or taking a loan against those equities to loan to GoPro (if the cost of capital is lower for them than GoPro, which seems plausible.)

I generally agree with your point about value extraction vs. re-investment.

Why would you need an M4 for this? If most of the "thinking" is happening on Anthropic's side, are you running particularly resource-intensive apps?

Are you speaking from experience or simply making things up? I know a fair number of former AWS engineers and managers. None of them think like this.

the Electron problem

If they did, they launched early! If they didn’t, their training data contains a bunch of poorly executed pelicans on bikes by other models.

My point is that no one is trying to short SpaceX as a hedge. It’s simply gambling.

I agree that hedging is real and useful. The comment I’m replying to isn’t trying to do that.

Because LLMs degrade with context length. And even if they didn't, having to constantly ingest the same stuff is wasteful for execution and cost. Why stuff the context when you don't have to?

So they're constantly hemorrhaging their most valuable clients?

Tech history is littered with the corpses of "open source but we sell hosting" services. Models are so expensive to train, you can't be losing the big clients once they get super profitable.

That's fair! I didn't read the comment I was replying to as being about the manipulation but, if so, I agree with their opinion.

I'm not an investor in SpaceX but I don't think shorting stocks at IPO should be allowed. The market should be given time to settle on a price, and it's unlikely that anyone needs to short it on day 1 for hedging. It's purely price speculation.

Yeah, I know why people _want to_ (betting), but it doesn't serve a broader economic purpose.

No, but the fact that they're the worst-performing BBB bonds, the company is burning cash, and the equity being down 38% since its peak after 1 month of trading is indicative of the market's…suspicions.

We'll see what ratings agencies think of the health of the company.

The NASDAQ is up 27% in the past 1 year. S&P 500 up 21%, DOW +20%.

So, it's doing pretty well!

I think this could be true if you use a single Claude context, since it has its own reasoning in the context.

But a separate code review agent does much better, in my experience.

Not my experience with my homie Claudius.

The code review agent usually has feedback to be resolved before committing, which includes bugs and unhandled edge cases. Sometimes the primary context is understandably embarrassed.

Sometimes it truly be your own people.

In your opinion/experience, why is it that they aren't switching?

I gave feedback on how someone comes across and recommended how to fix it. What the OP said was obviously passive/directly aggressive. They can take or leave the advice.

Your imagined scenario seems mostly fine, though I did give more direct advice than “go read some books.” If someone in my personal or professional gave me that feedback I might feel self-conscious, but I’d also appreciate it!

You seem pretty worked up over this. Maybe a good time to step back from the computer and consider whether it’s worth the emotional energy.

Nothing is beneath Altman, maybe, but Satya isn’t that dumb. MSFT cares about OAI but giving access to private data and trade secrets voluntarily would be catastrophic for them.

Doesn’t feel like the type of mistake Satya would make.

These are similar to arguments that people made about MongoDB. You can store anything! And then most people who used it realized that this is actually terrible, in most cases.

It looks like this is an artifact of when SQLite was written and the strong opinion of its author, less so a rigorous engineering principle. Reading this, it sounds like the author has been criticized a lot on this, is digging in their heels no matter what, and will find any supposed justification.

On the other hand, datatypes like JSON or HSTORE (in postgres) can handle what they are advocating for. But opt-in to YOLO typing is nearly always better than opt-out.

I would recommend removing "bro" from your lexicon, at least how you used it here. It comes across as aggressive and immature.

Not a huge deal, but you'll get better results in life without it.

If you read the SpaceX IPO docs, the vast majority of their self-stated addressable market is AI enterprise SaaS tools.

I’m not joking.

Even more recently, some of my favorite games are not that graphically intense. Hades and Hades II are phenomenal, for example.

This article is from 2015.

Right. All of which are what people on the far-right deem evidence of Liberal Bias.

But it's only "liberal" if you associate liberal (politically) with truth. These are established facts.

So my question to the liberal bias crown is: what are examples of non-factual biases? Where does show an agenda that has another reasonable side?

It would be easier to understand where you're coming from if you could give some examples containing:

- prompt

- response

- why it is wrong / misleading / biased

Because there are many people online complaining about left-wing bias, then you ask what about and they're like "Trump won in 2020, vaccines cause autism, global warming is a globalist conspiracy", etc. Which is to say, it's not left-wing bias but reality bias.

Not saying you are one of those people or that there isn't bias! It's just been hard, in my personal experience, to get at it.

The topic comment at the time I’m writing this is asking fair questions, in my opinion.

- Many people feel the death penalty is wrong in every case.

- Some have a general familiarity with high-level politics of elites and wonder about selective enforcement.

These don’t feel like they’re in bad faith. The merits are difficult to know from the outside, so there will always be speculation based on someone’s lived experience and perceptions. Better to have those aired with a chance to respond, in my opinion.

Especially for China, since it is a global power that operates differently from others. In my own country (United States), for example, we have brazenly open corruption with no consequences.

Xi has shown repeatedly that he’s serious about corruption. As others have noted, some of the highest civilian and military officials have been removed for it. Some sentenced to death.

He sees it as a challenge to his legitimacy and China’s power, which, as you’d expect are the most important things to him; even if you take the most cynical view.

Another timely example, because it is the World Cup, is the Chinese football programs. They’ve been decimated because of corruption prosecutions, both executives and players. It’s a major reason why China isn’t competitive on the global stage, which much smaller countries with significantly smaller budgets can compete. And, yes, Xi does care about competing in the World Cup. Prestige is very important to his concept of China’s honor and global standing.

I mean, Apple Intelligence has been a boondoggle. Siri has been consistently 3+ years behind in capabilities compared to even open source equivalents.

Feels less like the pace of foundation model development and more so a specific failure of one organization to do something important.

I'm not even sure what the "bug" in the title refers to, other than serving as clickbait.

How is this different from Postgres + PGBouncer? They decouple the connections from the the work of the database server itself, which can interleave transactions between connections to one connection to Postgres.

The article also mentions comparing against Redis "before 6.0"; 3 major versions behind.

It's fine to do marketing posts about your product, but I don't come away from this with strong signal for rigor.