tyc85

Second that, and I'd like to add google too with the following alternatives: 1. search: duckduckgo 2. email: proton

I know google is more pervasive in services, these two can be a good start.

that's cool. thanks!

DEF CON reports two years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18112172

typo: it's going to be interesting and* useful.

Hey, thanks again for challenging the thoughts and I learned something new.

I found an "expert" affidavit that shows the name (Navid Keshavarz-Nia):

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905...

Wonder if this one shows more merit so we can get on track to discuss if there's some serious vulnerabilities. It is more high-level though.

Second that this has to be the most important thing right now.

Other than the vulnerability report, I am also reading through many other data analysis as well. To be honest, some of the analyses are intriguing at the minimun. I am starting to collect my own dataset. Please reach out if anyone is interested too.

Data scientists on HN, how is this not at least fun to play with? Prove it right or prove it wrong, it's going to be interesting the useful. If there's anyone working in kaggle group, it has to be an interesting dataset to put together for exploration!

Thanks for digging out the details of hit credentials. It's possible that his credentials may not be as "qualified" to make such big allegation? I don't think I can make a judgement just based on the information you provided until I know what's his real duty and his past experience are. I tend to judge just based on the information he provided. And thanks to your other information, I see the flaws :)

Here's an "expert" affidavit that shows the name (Navid Keshavarz-Nia):

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905...

At least I want to know whether the system is really vulnerable, since if it is, it can go either way. Perhaps this should be another thread :)

Hey, thanks for the reference link from medium. That's a pretty good write up. I learned a lot. The author seems a bit biased though, when he claim quite strongly that: "Therefore, all the claims in the report about dominionvotingsystems.com — while potentially valid — have nothing to do with dominionvoting.com." After stating some of his own findings. I somehow feel like it's a hard sell to me that dominionvotingsystems.com is absolutely not related to dominionvoting.com given the name. And the fact that they used to redirect back in 2011 add some probability of the relation, however small probability you would weigh in for that addition. The changed of hands from Canada to US and back to China, does not reduce the chance of relation. If may increase the chance of relation given the company's footprint.

In sum, I can now see that this affidavit drew weak connections and made strong conclusions. So the credibility of the allegation is not that high. But to be fair to the person, it is court filing and he will be accountable for lying.

I see. Thanks. Before you pointing out that you have high confidence the person should be "Dennis Montgomery" I cannot see the relation. If so, those links are indeed related :)

Will lookup this guy.

Hi, appreciate the suspicious things you pointed out. I do think there are gaps in the allegation. It could be all absurd. I'd like to find out what are absurd, and what are not. The judge, the lawyers know who this person is since it is a court filing. He is still under penalty of perjury. His credentials are described in first page. Again I'm here to learn what experts think of these connections. They can be weak and point to nothing, and I am happy to hear about it. At least next time my radar will be sharper.

Here's how I understand some of his points, and willing to be corrected:

- and 75 hashed passwords available in TOR nodes => I interpret it as he can find passwords available to login these systems. Is this plausible? Does that show the system could be vulnerable, or not really?

- dominionvotingsystems.com domain was registered on 5/28/2020 => this only show it was registered again, correct? The redirection from dominionvotingsystems.com cease to exists sometime between 2011 and 2020, that's true.

- This Dominion partner domain “dvscorp” => I thought the key is that the same domain is hosted on the same server hence have some relation. But I could be wrong, that all of these are just hosted by the some ISP service, and somehow the ISP would cohost unrelated domain on the same IP or server/VM.

His stated credentials: I was an electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence. I have extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world. The methodologies I have employed represent industry standard cyber operation toolkits for digital forensics and OSINT, which are commonly used to certify connections between servers, network nodes and other digital properties and probe to network system vulnerabilities.

Thanks for sharing but not related to the question I asked or the court filing I shared. I would encourage people to read more court filing, and less news media on the internet. At least those are sworn under oath and under penalty of perjury.

I wonder how would hackers look at this analysis/information.

Does NYT really have the vote counts time series available publicly? It would be an interesting dataset for future study. You either prove there is anomaly (for various possible reasons) or you find ways to model it and explain it rationally.

Seeing it another way, assuming you did not read the young generation incorrectly: even the uninterested youngsters have a bottomline and cannot stand what the Chinese government is doing anymore.

As a Taiwanese, I am more optimistic than your are regarding the thinking and passion of young east Asians.

I think the short answer is no, currently there isn't a reasonably priced LTE routers that you can deployed by yourself. There are products available though. That's why the question can be interesting to be figured out to a certain extent.

Whether device look for carrier in unlicensed spectrum: the answer is yes, Licensed Assisted Access is happening, though slowly, as with any things related to carrier. See this link: https://support.t-mobile.com/thread/144981

Finally, it's certainly not something you can only do with SDR, but then doing it with SDR could be what makes it appealing though, it the price can be somewhat brought down. Good Wi-Fi routers nowadays cost a lot anyways, and some even wants you to pay monthly fee, no?

Has anyone ever consider bringing up a private LTE network (over unlicensed or shared spectrum), either at home, enterprise, or even MDU?

Density and security are less of a concern on LTE, and the peak throughput is catching up.

The question I have has always been: are we seeing a world moving towards a more controlled wireless network architecture or a evolved version of Wi-Fi type of ad-hoc architecture.

Asimily | Sunnyvale, CA | Software Generalist | ONSITE | Full-Time | $120K – $150K (0.5% – 2.5%)

Asimily is an IoT analytics startup focused on solving security and operational use cases for connected devices in specific verticals - healthcare, buildings, industrial control systems, etc.) We are seed funded by a top tier seed investor, have a product, have a customer and have interest from several others. Founders have deep experience in product, the market and the technology. One of the founders has run the connected device business unit at a Fortune 500 company for 4 years.

In a nutshell, the company is looking for a sharp, hands-on generalist knowledgeable in Data Science and Machine Learning.

Feel free to apply via AngelList if that's easier for you, or drop me an email to chat.

For reference: https://angel.co/asimily/jobs/