tru3_power

This probably works with PDF parsing as well I’m sure, even if it’s just from not having to parse pdf format alone.

This is insane lol- not like a “wow this is scary” insane but more like “really? you need a frontier model to this??”

Let’s say this is the case it still does not explain what the real end game looks like. What do you think?

Did they state what made them have that hunch?

I kinda felt like this was coming so mid last year I built a local rig with the top of the line parts I could afford at the time lol (rtx5090/ryzen9 etc) now I just need to build out my inference setup (sadly m3 ultras r insanely expensive now) - I have a feeling they will try to lock down usage of open source LLMs too. I don’t get how token moat can exist if local inference rigs can be built out and serve open source models locally for nothing (besides power cost).

Is it really crazy though? Sad, but given the state of everything I don’t find this crazy.

What’s the purpose of licensing requiring though things though if someone could just use an open source model to do that anyway? If someone were going to do those things you mentioned why do it through some commercial enterprise tool? I can see maybe licensing requiring a certain level of hardening to prevent prompt injections, but ultimately it still really comes down to how much power you give the model in whatever context it’s operating in.

I circled back to this, The only mechanics I can think of and I’m not sure if it’s really even really a thing (maybe someone can chime in) is that market makers buying shares to cover their calls or something along those lines? How does one even really trace this type of transaction?

Dang so this is much more comprehensive than a normal polygraph. I know the write up says it would be almost impossible to beat, but is that true?

Can you elaborate on the mechanical point you mentioned? And by someone needed collateral, does that mean whoever it was bought ORCL at that time to hold as collateral? How do you even figure that out?

When you say debt financing (Oracle) does that mean Oracle is actually financing the loans to these other companies? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding.

Forreal that’s what really gets me about this haha. Literally billions of dollars burned on bullshit.

I did not get him running for president from this. Which part made you think that?

I am building a new rig after years of solely using a MacBook, and reading all these horror stories of windows 10/11 I am just gonna go with Ubuntu. I may dual boot with windows but only if really needed.

I wouldn’t say this lends to a bias of over-engineering but more so psc optimizing

Yeah that’s what I’m understanding is the case. That’s why they’re harping on no known (unreleased) vulns. But it’s kinda funny, a lot of times bugs that fall under this category are constantly shuffled around/not fixed because there is no public pressure to address them.

“No one will ever find these vulns without source access! Fix deferred” oh wait…

Our political leaders refuse to even say the word genocide - I don’t think they give damn.

Also wouldn’t all information have to be available to all participants? How does insider knowledge factor here (because it sure does in the market)

That is insane. What happens when that house of cards comes falling down?

Can you give some example questions?

Did we really though?

I don’t think that’s the case actually - there was a case recently where someone got sentenced to jail time just for selling a template that could be used to do so: https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdfl/pr/youtuber-and-auto-key-c...

What was the reasoning behind this change? Isn’t R&D something we’d encourage to be a tax write off since it reduces the cost of well.. R&D? Or is R&D not as important as I’m thinking?

So why couldn’t one make a malicious iot device/tool to do just that? I’m kinda confused on the need for access via some other exploit. (I have little domain knowledge on Bluetooth) - when you say scan/spoof/attack any near by device, is it ones that the target is already connected to? Sorry for dumb question

Why not? NPM behaves oddly when there is a public package named the same as one on a private repo, in some cases it’ll fetch the public one instead. I believe it’s called package squatting or something. They might have just been showing that this is possible during an assessment. No harm no foul here imo

Out of curiosity- did it work though?

Yeah but this is just the name of the game. How can you even stop SEO style gamification at this point? I’m sure even LLMs are vulnerable/have been trained on SEO bs. End of the day it takes an informed user. Remember back in the day? Don’t trust the internet? I think that mindset will become the main school of thought once again. Which tbh, I think maybe a good thing.

Wow what? Thanks!

Yeah I was thinking while reading this- aren’t they actually allowed to sell that empty seat already since they are allowed to oversell? What do they want to do here? Triple dip?