HN user

tpiddy

175 karma
Posts14
Comments34
View on HN

This trend also makes startups just less attractive as destinations for employees. My experience is that startups that have started to scale still don't have as much compensation as larger more mature companies.

Employees join for a number of reasons but stock compensation is one of them. This compensation has always been risky and hard to value but it is now becoming risky, hard to value and even if the company succeeds the compensation won't be realized for a very long time.

I generally agree with DHH's assessment of CRM and think it is ridiculous it trades such a high p/e compared to similar companies like Adobe.

That said, moving email providers is likely a huge pain in the ass for those 6000 customers. They are basically locked in for years and years. There may be potential to raise prices and gain profit from those customers. Internal investment to move vendors is likely in the hundreds of thousands.

Salesforce already has a few of these same clients through BuddyMedia and other B2C offerings, but the cross sell of a marketing suite is what they are envisioning. I expect that outside of a potential Marketo purchase, they will purchase companies with more b2c or general marketing offerings, potentially search, display or other ad related products to compliment Social.com.

something like 90%+ of Marketo's customers integrate it with Salesforce. Of course Salesforce won't just cut them off if they have a competitor tool, due to anti-trust issues, but it doesn't necessarily bode well for Marketo now that Salesforce owns a competitor. Pardot is a fairly small piece of Exacttarget though so potentially Marketo could still be a target at some point.

Larger scale B2C marketing automation is generally much more complex than b2b. Ecommerce databases are generally less normalized across businesses, aren't hosted by an intermediary like salesforce and contain more data. Cross-channel retailers with physical stores track a ton of transactions and customers. I really don't think that any b2b marketing automation platform will make much headway trying to go b2c. Hubspot has some success only because they focus on local and small businesses.

sophisticated marketers have done hold-out tests with retargeting shown that it can drive incremental sales at a profitable roi. this includes big ecommerce brands.

granted not every viewthrough and clickhtrough conversion is driven by the advertising, but some definitely are and it is often profitable if a campaign is optimized and run well.

so you're saying the best website should win without "cheating" right? its not that simple.

you could make the same argument about all advertising/marketing.

the best product should win on its own standards, without advertising, right? for example, wouldn't we all have better insurance rates if geico, progressive and esurance didn't have to spend their money on advertising?

But the truth is these insurance companies are disrupting old school insurance models that are less efficient and bringing value to more consumers faster with their advertising.

companies adapt, consumers adapt, markets adapt, search engines adapt. companies and people are going to work toward their self interest, and SEO is one way to do this. its called capitalism.

Español - Estoy aprendiendo hace 3 meses con los websites Duolingo.com, italki.com, anki y otros. Espero que en un año puedo tener buenas conversaciónen con hablantes fluidos.

There are some really interesting emerging ways to learn a foreign language also an emerging community of language learners and polyglots on the internet.

View through conversions are conversions that take place after a visitor has just viewed an ad and not necessarily clicked on the ad. In the case of traditional display, the ad may not have even been visible on the screen it was just served somewhere on the page.

Google Analytics conversions are last touch click through conversions, where all marketing touches compete and the last that occured gets 100% of the credit.

I work for AdRoll. I left a comment on this blog post but it hasn't been approved yet.

We’d really appreciate the opportunity to do a real comparison. In this post, they are comparing a campaign without Facebook Exchange (AdRoll) to a campaign with Facebook Exchange access and using two different definitions for conversions.

It’s a little odd that FBX wasn't included with the AdRoll campaign since unlike PerfectAudience, AdRoll is actually is one of few PMDs that have a seat on FBX ( http://www.facebook-pmdcenter.com/fbx ) and has the most clients running FBX campaigns of any FBX PMD.

PerfectAudience’s CPCs and CPMs are likely lower because Facebook retargeting is cheaper in this regard, and if they ran an AdRoll FBX would likely be comparable.

Also looking at your charts, they never setup conversion tracking in AdRoll. Without this they are comparing (PerfectAudience) view through conversion CPA to last touch Google analytics click through conversion CPA. To analytics and online marketing expert, it should be obvious this is not a fair comparison.

A lot of the UI callouts are valid and AdRoll is working on new features and launching a new dashboard very shortly. If anyone wants to setup a real test and do real analysis of performance, we’d be happy to help.

-Tom

A few years ago, I used to work for a large local newspaper/TV media holding company with about 70 web properties.

In the 1.5 years I was there, they had about 6 CMS in action. IPS(i think?), ExpressionEngine, Day CQ, Wordpress and Ellington.

Smaller TV affiliates and publications are moving to Wordpress because of its price and how easy it is to find support/developers with experience.

If I remember correctly, the company I was previously with left Ellington to develop their own CMS features on top of Django.

Until sites like Pinterest can actually share affiliate revenue somehow down to their users, these sites will "send exactly as much [traffic] without the modified links."

This leaves no incentive for a merchant to allow pinterest to affiliate their links.

I remember reading Posterous is using skimlink's competitor Viglink http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1309403

The real question is WHY would companies let Posterous or Pinterest become affiliates at all? Where are the incremental sales? It makes sense for businesses to encourage USERS to become affiliates and promote their products, but allowing user-gen site to monetize their users' links does not encourage their users to link and promote products more.

I had a Facebook recruiter send me a message on Facebook about the possibility of work for them, and it went to my Other folder. I didn't see the message for months.

you've completely left off mobile analytics!

i'm not sure startup analytics are so different than larger company analytics (i work for a large ecommerce site doing analytics).

might just be my opinion, sitecatalyst can be overly complicated/difficult to implement but it really does have some unique strengths also. it is also one of the more expensive tools though.

to the best of my knowledge, the approach JCP (or their agency) took was to to create a background/shadow site full of pages behind the main site. these pages are promoted via links and cross linked to be used as doorway pages.

jcp's server/hostname strategy seems broken, but if you look at the robots.txt and the site index they promote, it's really confusing compared to the UI and links they expose to traffic entering their site on the homepage.

also see some similar patterns (but not exact) on other big name retailers that might share the same agency.

i love my htc evo. the battery isn't as great as my pre but after disabling a few things and some tweaks it is not nearly as bad as everyone is making it out to be. hopefully it will get better with software updates or an extended battery that fits the standard cover will come out.