HN user

tontinton

359 karma

https://tontinton.com

Posts9
Comments40
View on HN

I meant harnesses / TUIs, sorry to confuse.

Using fd/rg sounds interesting, honestly it would require little tweaks to the bash tool lua plugin, either add to the description to prefer these binaries instead or something like that.

In general though I much prefer "advising" and encouraging the LLM to use the native tools like grep l/glob, they are implemented to be super fast, and you will get better parser output.

The biggest ones are: using tree-sitter to index code files as a tool, code_execution tool running a workflow of tools inside a python interpreter (monty), and not being a harness developed by the company profiting from selling you the shovels (and introducing "dynamic workflows" aka spawning 50 agents).

Totally wrong, you underestimate the frontier's incompetence in anything other than building LLM models (ehm ehm flickering TUI for a year "written like a game engine").

I ran a bunch of benchmarks and there are proven ways to reduce tokens while achieving the same results (finding the same CVEs / finding the same bugs in CRs, etc...).

See https://maki.sh, it's my own little proof.

Thanks!

Currently the subagent chat windows don't allow to inject user messages like the main window, I want to change that soon though.

Regarding tiered models, it currently caps the model use to the current tier you're on, so no it can't upgrade from haiku to opus suddenly. The reasoning for that is that if you selected haiku, you probably don't want to pay for opus by accident.

I've sold out 4 months ago

Yes, you can use the dynamic provider to work with any local model you want (see scripts/providers)

I've sold out 4 months ago

Is this a good time to tell you guys that there are many more alternatives, like my very own https://maki.sh?

Shameless plug, yes, but it's free, so I think it's fair :)

I thought about it, I just wanted people to get hooked with some eye candy, and to want to continue reading ;)