HN user

tithe

1,084 karma

Student.

Start now and keep moving, the future is promised to no one.

Posts47
Comments223
View on HN
cwe.mitre.org 1y ago

CWE Taxonomies

tithe
1pts0
www.reuters.com 1y ago

Argentina breeds gene-edited polo super ponies

tithe
1pts0
www.reuters.com 1y ago

US FDA identifies cybersecurity risks in certain patient monitors

tithe
1pts0
www.razer.com 1y ago

RazerCafe, Singapore

tithe
1pts0
www.researchgate.net 1y ago

The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-Making in a Complex and Complicated World

tithe
2pts0
www.researchgate.net 1y ago

Value-Based Pricing for New Software Products: Strategy Insights for Developers

tithe
1pts0
news.ycombinator.com 1y ago

Ask HN: How do you develop and cultivate your critical thinking?

tithe
9pts11
dl.acm.org 1y ago

Calendar Queues: A Fast O(1) Priority Queue Implementation (1988)

tithe
63pts31
en.wikipedia.org 1y ago

Catfish Effect

tithe
3pts0
www.reuters.com 1y ago

US Judge Strikes Down Ban on Worker 'Noncompete' Agreements

tithe
145pts147
www.reuters.com 1y ago

Boeing, Lockheed Martin in talks to sell rocket-launch firm ULA to Sierra Space

tithe
8pts0
www.reuters.com 1y ago

Intel sells stake in chip designer Arm Holdings

tithe
83pts72
hbr.org 1y ago

The Competitive Advantage of Nations (1990)

tithe
4pts1
www.schneier.com 1y ago

New Patent Application for Car-to-Car Surveillance

tithe
4pts2
economicprinciples.org 1y ago

Ray Dalio's "The Changing World Order" [pdf]

tithe
39pts29
www.linuxfoundation.org 1y ago

Secure Software Development Education 2024 Survey

tithe
1pts0
web.archive.org 1y ago

Seeking Leverage for Deep Transformation

tithe
1pts1
www.reuters.com 1y ago

Sharks off Rio de Janeiro test positive for cocaine

tithe
4pts3
www.cocorahs.org 2y ago

CoCoRaHS State Climates Series

tithe
1pts0
chandra.cfa.harvard.edu 2y ago

A Universe of Sound – Turning Astronomical Images into Sound via Sonification

tithe
2pts2
www.reuters.com 2y ago

Running with the Bulls Through Pamplona Streets

tithe
1pts0
science.nasa.gov 2y ago

NASA's Galaxy of Horrors

tithe
12pts0
www.reuters.com. 2y ago

US to Criminally Charge Boeing, Seek Guilty Plea, Sources Say

tithe
57pts25
www.reuters.com 2y ago

Russian Scientists Conduct Autopsy on 44,000-year-old Permafrost Wolf Carcass

tithe
3pts0
www.thedpa.ai 2y ago

Dataset Providers Alliance

tithe
2pts1
www.reuters.com 2y ago

Prosecutors Recommend DOJ Criminally Charge Boeing as Deadline Looms

tithe
7pts1
www.reuters.com. 2y ago

Biden offers citizenship path to spouses of US citizens

tithe
5pts1
www.uspto.gov 2y ago

USPTO Path to a Patent Series

tithe
1pts0
www.uspto.gov 2y ago

USPTO Trademark Basics Boot Camp Series

tithe
2pts0
www.iihs.org 2y ago

Survey shows "Over 60% of drivers are OK with anti-speeding tech in vehicles"

tithe
2pts3

Henry Petroski in "To Engineer is Human" has a chapter about the advent of the calculator during the slide rule era, and that calculators (and later computers) eroded a structural engineer's "feel for the numbers", caused engineers to pursue work on the fringe of their abilities, and perhaps more seriously, limited their ability to verify the correctness of the computer's work (this was the era where, for the first time, a machine could perform orders of magnitude calculations more quickly than humans could). He outlines the collapse of the Hartford Civic Center [1] as a case study in when blindly trusting computer output goes wrong (and by sheer luck, no one was killed).

It feels like the example was cherry-picked, but the combination of "less accurate" and "more confident" made me immediately think of this disaster. I truly worry that it's going to take civilian deaths / liability before the proper use / place of these new technologies is adopted, but we could probably start with 1) not in safety critical systems, and 2) don't replace your specialists / experts with algorithms.

[1] https://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/thesis/failures/MKP/failures/fai...

Agreed, building something is just the first step.

One of the marketing struggles I've had is just getting people to care. I did have a bit of an "If you build it, they will come" attitude because I had confidence in the quality of the work...but even that seems to be irrelevant if you can't get people interested.

As an introvert by nature (extrovert by necessity), I wonder what I'm missing that others seems to grasp innately, because the consequences are fatal for an entrepreneur if you can't convince others to at least try the thing you're offering.

Just be careful if you believe the itch is the result of something you might be allergic to (e.g., food, or bug bites).

I had several bites from fire ants and ran them under hot water from the bath, which seemed to trigger (or accelerate) a full-body reaction (anaphylaxis?) and a harrowing trip to the emergency room!

Seth Klarman, in Margin of Safety...

May I ask where / how you came about your copy? I've seen it mentioned several times but have found it difficult to locate. (For example, the used copy on Amazon is selling for $2000!)

Personally, I enjoy detail-oriented activies, so software suits me just fine. But if I was going to switch to something else, I'd ask myself "What other detail-oriented industries could I thrive in?"

* Restaurant / hotel management (specifically, the atmosphere and ambience of a space)

* Architecture / architectural engineering

* Real estate development / planning

* Movie set dressing (!)

How about this one?

   "What do you call the number of times that one number can be divided by another?" A) Dividend, B) Divisor, C) Quotient.
And a minor UX nitpick: please wrap the input element inside of a <label> tag, it makes it much easier to interact with form elements (in that I can click on the text to mark the element):
      <label class="answer">
        <input type="radio" name="q4" value="wrong" /> Condensation
      </label>

OK, I didn't mean to sound harsh, that statement just seemed out of place.

Taking another look at this, here's what I see:

As AI capability continues to advance, it'll consistently and increasingly outperform traditional human analysis in both speed and accuracy.

Our Orchid hybrid model combines neural networks, quantitative models, and language models to leverage both numerical and textual information, enabling smarter, faster algorithmic decision-making with significantly less human supervision.

Here's a couple use cases: ...

Simulating the past twelve months, our implementation of Orchid outperformed the S&P 500 by over 10%.

These four statements tell me the problem/opportunity, your solution to that opportunity, how that solution might be relevant / useful to me, and proof that your solution works.

This is your value proposition, and what I need to know about Orchid as a potential customer / user. I'd consolidate these four statements and put them at the top of the page. The jokes can come later (but I'd still tone down the sarcasm).

The sarcasm is heavily working against you here.

- Misspelling as "alll"

- Drop the "Oh, ..."

- "not exactly sure what these so-called ‘schools’ do, but I think if they keep working hard they’ll be famous one day."

- "~enslaved~ employed 300 extraterrestrial space giraffes to speed up our math stuff"

The sorta freedom you only get in Afghanistan these days.

Is this supposed to be a joke? Freedoms in Afghanistan have significantly declined since the Taliban took power in 2021.

I stopped reading after this.

If your country allows it, why not consider both? Or a major in CS with a minor in Business Administration/Finance?

...a CS degree...will probably lose value.

I wouldn't bet on that. Computers aren't going anywhere, and just in the past 15 years, we've seen entire industries created around smartphones, cloud computing, streaming, VR, IoT, SaaS, and AI. Pick which wave you want to surf! A technical and/or a business background would be useful here.

I'm not confident that 4 years from now the field will be what it is now.

That I would bet on.

And by the way, just because you major (or don't major) in something doesn't mean you've locked yourself into (or out of) that activity. When I switched from music performance to computer science, I had the feeling that I had turned my back on my music, that I couldn't now excel in it...which was nonsense! It wasn't until I realized, that just because I don't major in something doesn't mean I still can't do that thing well, was I able to embrace the decision to choose CS.

Best of luck in your decision.

This was in New York City.

There absolutely should be some kind of notice, or at least an opting-in (where the "opt-in" is not the act of simply getting into a cab).

It's irritating a vital service like this becomes an "all or nothing" deal, where I can't selectively opt-out of some shady practice and still use the fundamental service.

[dead] 2 years ago

Dynamic response generation for employer-specific questions

Tone and style matching to fit company culture

Keyword optimization for improved application relevance

Can't say I'm thrilled to see AI being used like this.

What are the long-term implications of making a tool like this publicly available? What first-stage "job CAPTCHAs" await applicants to distinguish them from bots? Rate-limited background checks from an accredited third party, like id.me?

Will companies even care that this is now the state of the recruitment landscape? And if not, without a deep professional network and personal relationships, how will you be able to cut through the noise?