HN user
These are good suggestions but one of the better ways I think is to get on a call with the person that will be your manager or whoever you'll be reporting to. It cuts through a lot of cruft that you'd have to infer from the job ad and the company's online persona.
Right. He mentions a few but they again seem to be things chemists were aware of. I really wanted to see the patterns chemists didn't think of instead of the algorithms recovering what was already known.
I didn't follow. If you take a high dimensional data set and project it are you not going to find patterns? In fact, let me ask it differently. Are there any projections that don't find patterns?
Blizzard cleaned it all up. Their games were so good no one even bothered to compete. I spent countless hours playing starcraft and warcraft. The other games didn't have the same addictive elements.
The other animals that seem to have a lot of intelligence are crows. They're birds but act like social primates: https://www.thedodo.com/in-the-wild/crows-bring-gifts-to-kin....
But this is all fame and power. It corrupts the participants of the game. I didn't understand the dig at feminism in the end because the article was about fame and power games and not specific ideologies.
I like your explanation better. The general concept is hidden in the original essay. How did you figure out the generalization?
Reminded me of Bret Victor's dynamicland and this course on quantum computing: https://quantum.country/qcvc.
It's easy to forget that we can use all sorts of technology as mental crutches for making environments more kind and learnable.
This was very good. Thanks for sharing.