HN user

thinkerswell

16 karma
Posts3
Comments58
View on HN

What an insult to someone who has taken on the responsibility of raising a child. Of course they should be called parents. A man doesn’t adopt a son only to be called his “child raiser”. Stop this foolish line of thought.

Catholic charities don't help everyone in need

Neither do state sponsored programs, we’re talking about trade offs here, and I’m saying that Id rather the money not be taken by force and incompetently redistributed just so we can wind up with more of the terrible system we have now.

Where are the Catholic charities solving the problem, then?

You mean the ones that aren’t receiving funding because the people are being taxed to hell?

I think we’re going in circles and have different ideological starting points. I’ll leave the last word to you.

It wasn't done privately before

Of course it was, and still is. It’s done less privately now because the funds that would be given to private resources are confiscated before they can be given. An excellent example: Catholic charities.

That's why the government programs exist One of the stated goals, but also a reduction of the influence of religious institutions is another.

Just slink off and die' isn't really a workable alternative. This is fallacious; look at the the homeless in SanFran. That’s what our current government programs amount to.

Even in the US, at the time of the constitution, many states had state churches. It was just prevented at the federal level. So it’s entirely possible for Florida to reinstate a state church over Florida and be within it’s constitutional bounds.