theosp

Well done! Thank you for sharing

Interesting, I wasn't aware of this project.

At JustDo we make our source code available for transparency and collaboration, we use a source-available license that ensures fair compensation for our work. This model allows us to maintain the benefits of open development while avoiding the pitfalls of unrestricted open-source licensing, ensuring we can sustainably develop and support our software.

I developed this license https://justdo.com/source-available-license , if someone wants to adopt it for their project, I'd love to provide its Latex form, just DM me. (With enough demand, I might Open Source the Source available license ;) )."

Two Claude accounts of mine got blocked (one of them was a paid account for which I got a refund following the block), without explanation, very normal use.

I loved using Claude, I think it did better job than other LLM. Attempts to appeal failed with no response.

You think you can help me figure it out?

Simple, beautiful website that serves its purpose.

I got that one on JustDo.com ; it is more of a tasks/teams management tool. But might fit your usecase.

In the spirit of sharing, I wanted to mention a project I'm working on, called JustDo.com . We've been developing this enterprise-grade project management and planning tool and have seen validated product-market fit with some Fortune 500 companies.

We believe strongly in the power of open source and we're preparing to go 'Open Core' by this summer (See Community Edition in the pricing page to see what will be Open Sourced). Our intention is to give back to the community and enable more people to benefit from our tool.

If anyone is interested in exploring more about JustDo or participating in our open-source journey, I'd be more than happy to chat or answer any questions you might have :)

I am about to open source a web-app in the field in about two months.

Been in the making for 7 years, is in use by famous big-corps for few years already.

Bi-directional Jira integration built-in.

I am not mentioning the name of the tool simply because the landing page is really not where I want it to be at the moment

If you are looking for a solution in the field can DM me and I'll give you access to the code before we complete all the open source preparation.

Our speciality is that the tool solves both the communication problem (Trello, Asana) and the planning problem (MS Projects). Typical client will have 50-400 active users.

-Daniel

afaik it dates back at least to Ancient Athens and was one of the tenets of their democracy: rich people were excluded from the political process entirely.

Source please.

Well, "it is stated that at least US$3.5 billion has been stolen from Malaysia's 1MDB state-owned fund" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1Malaysia_Development_Berhad)

Even if guilty, what GS has to do with any debt beyond what it raised for 1mdb (us$6b)?

You write: "Given that GS was the underwriter and allegedly the key enabler of the scandal, punishing GS by making them pay at least the majority of those taxpayer losses seems unjustified or unfair to you? What amount do you believe is fair?"

But from reading the first paragraph under the History section here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1Malaysia_Development_Berhad

it is clear that by the time Goldman started raising money for 1mdb (2012 if i am not mistaken), a lot of money been raised already, i.e. GS wasn't the key enabler.

So why blame Goldman for all the debt accumulated under 1mdb?

Where the $12 billion figure is coming from? $6 billion is what GS raised. Also, not all the said $6 billion disappeared.

[edit: added 'Also, not all the $6 billion disappeared']

Can you elaborate on why you think the large fee isn't a clear evidence the organisation as a whole was complicit?

As far as I understand it, he refers to Goldman's maximum assumed losses from all the litigations they are involved in, not just 1mdb.

So, no, gs are offering nothing at the moment.

From Goldman's q3 report: 'As of the date hereof, the firm has estimated the upper end of the range of reasonably possible aggregate loss for such matters and for any other matters described below where management has been able to estimate a range of reasonably possible aggregate loss to be approximately $1.8 billion in excess of the aggregate reserves for such matters.'

Anyone can shed light on Goldman's chances to get fair trial from the Malaysian courts?

7.5b is more than 10 times the fee collected by Goldman, why stop there?

https://medium.com/@cwodtke/users-dont-hate-change-they-hate...