thebeefytaco

Extensive experimental results in real-world scenarios demonstrate that Printlistener can attack up to 26.5% of partial fingerprints and 9.3% of complete fingerprints within five attempts at the highest security FAR setting of 0.01%

Why wouldn't you list vax mandates and general covid policies as responses?

I'm pretty sure that's the point.

If you actually get significant traction on any videos, wouldn't the bandwidth costs be stupidly expensive if you're self hosting?

Glad to see I'm not the only person who does that! Great way to catch those who share/sell your email and to set up filtering.

I didn't expect to see anything like that, but I wanted to.

If the laptop became property of the repair shop, how would that be illicitly obtained?

The Bell monopoly was only enabled by goverment to begin with.

You're confusing the ease of compliance with the nature of the order itself.

As an example, banning certain words could be considered a "mild inconvenience", but it's clearly a violation of the first amendment.

Border patrol and other police checkpoints, are a "mild inconvenience". They may very well help catch more criminals, but police need to have probable cause and can't just go on fishing expeditions.

As far as a _federal_ mask mandate, it's clearly not within the enumerated powers. I think you could potentially make an argument for state/local mask mandates when it comes to _public_ areas, given that all powers not granted to the federal goverment are reserved for the states and the people. I would still probably consider that authoritarian in nature.

That's just for masks as well. As far as locking down or limiting size of gatherings, while it may be a very good idea to do something like that during a pandemic, Imo it wouldn't be constitutional, as the freedom of assembly is explicitly protected in the first amendment.

Freedom can be dangerous, but I prefer it to the alternative.

I get you're responding to the other guy there saying we should look at science instead of popularity, but both are invalid if we're talking about responsibility of goverment.

There's plenty of scientific evidence that sugar, alcohol, and tobacco are all horrible for you. Scientifically, it might make sense to ban those things health wise, but that's not the role of government, and would be authoritarian rules that limit freedom for "safety".

"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

No, you don't have the freedom to destroy someone else's property.

I get the point of view that "you don't have the freedom to infect others", but where do you logically draw the line with something like that? Why weren't we already required to wear biohazard suits in public? Humans have been spreading disease as long as we've been around.

Your reasoning is so blunt, saying that just become some laws are justified, all laws are justified. Should you not have the privilege to drive, because every time you do you risk your life and others?

- Authoritarianism can be supported by majority, and that first point is essentially argumentum ad populum. The US isn't a direct democracy for good reason, as that is essentially mob/majority rule, and erodes the rights of individuals.

- If we're referring to the US, it really doesn't matter what the functions of other governments may be. The founding fathers clearly defined the responsibilities of the federal goverment, and it isn't their job to protect you from any sort of harm. I don't see how that would line up with anything in the enumerated powers. Ignoring the US, the act is still authoritarian whether you agree with it or not, as it's an order from the top down which limits individual freedom. Again, whether people agree with it or not is a moot point.

- Your point here is anecdotal, and I don't think selective enforcement of the law is nessecarily a good thing. If it's not enforced at all, why make it a mandate and not a recommendation? Also the enforcement or lack thereof of a law/order has nothing to do with the authoritatian nature of it.

While these points you're making may be reasons you think it's a good idea, I don't think you've made a case that it wouldn't be authoritarian. I'm not even saying that inherently makes the idea bad, but you should call it what it is.

To be clear, I'm not against wearing masks. I've had N95s since before this pandemic and wear them whenever I go out in public, moreso to help proyrct others than myself. I am however very weary of granting the goverment authority like that and setting precedent during a national crisis that would erode our liberties long after the fact, like the patriot act.

People aren't asking for authoritarian restrictions. People have been asking for common-sense coordinated and effective measures that we can all rally around (like wearing masks).

Whether you agree with it or not, how would a mask mandate not be an authoritarian restriction?

Well I just quickly tested, and NoScript doesn't seem to block that, whereas it would if it were externally loaded or inline JS on a web page.

So that's one difference. Not that the type of person to use NoScript would likely paste obvious javascript into the address bar...

Edit: Doesn't look like you can create a valid URL with that format, but it can be launched via pasting in (obviously), a bookmark (which the contents of which could be obfuscated by telling a user to drag an image to the bookmark bar and click it), and can be launched via command line, e.g.

  start firefox "data:text/html,<script>alert('');</script>"

As someone with a SaaS software startup, this is something I have to remind myself from time to time. Particularly because when you're so close to the product, you're intensely aware of the bugs and issues.

It's comforting to know people do have a tolerance for minor bugs and issues.

We were pleasantly surprised how much positive feedback we'd get, even when encountering bugs though and I believe overestimated how "perfect" it needed to be for the first release. From experience I've learned it's much better to ship it and improve it with incremental updates rather than to try and wait for "perfection".

I think it depends on the task/what you're trying to learn specifically and what type of learner you are.

One claimed he shot his own hand while aiming for a hawk, while another said that he shot his foot when he mistook it for a squirrel.

These claims generally received payouts of $5,000 to $10,000, but as the scam went on, the claims increased in value as the residents became more bold.

Wow that is nowhere close to worth it for that amount of money. Even the "larger numbers" of potentially being able to get away with $100k-$1M seems pretty low as an upper limit for self amputation.

Starting to leave? Hasn't this been going on for a while now in California in general?

Here's a list of all the channels:

* Traversy Media: https://www.youtube.com/user/TechGuyWeb

* 3Blue1Brown: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYO_jab_esuFRV4b17AJtAw

* ThePrimeagen: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8ENHE5xdFSwx71u3fDH5Xw

* Gaurav Sen: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRPMAqdtSgd0Ipeef7iFsKw

* Jon Gjengset: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_iD0xppBwwsrM9DegC5cQQ

* Two Minute Papers: https://www.youtube.com/user/keeroyz

* Raymond Hettinger (no channel): https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Raymond+Hetting...

* Simple Programmer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRxWW_Ncs308nW4An23Yeig

* The Coding Train: https://www.youtube.com/user/shiffman

* Academind: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSJbGtTlrDami-tDGPUV9-w

* Derek Banas: https://www.youtube.com/user/derekbanas

* Mark Lewis: https://www.youtube.com/user/DrMarkCLewis

* Dev Ed: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClb90NQQcskPUGDIXsQEz5Q

* The Net Ninja: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW5YeuERMmlnqo4oq8vwUpg

* Fun Fun Function: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO1cgjhGzsSYb1rsB4bFe4Q

* Computerphile: https://www.youtube.com/user/Computerphile

* Bisqwit: https://www.youtube.com/user/Bisqwit

* ThinMatrix: https://www.youtube.com/user/ThinMatrix

* Gary of Destroy All of Software (non-youtube): https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/screencasts#:~:text=Destr....

* PatrickJMT: https://www.youtube.com/user/patrickJMT

* Ben Awad: https://www.youtube.com/user/99baddawg

* Google Chrome Developers: https://www.youtube.com/user/ChromeDevelopers

5 min sample of the audiobook: https://samples.audible.com/bk/tant/021266/bk_tant_021266_sa...

As mentioned in the post, a pretrained model is available here: https://tfhub.dev/google/LaBSE/1

While I don't trust silicon valley or China with my data, there's a big difference between US corporate interests and that of communist China.

I've been wanting to get some dev kits to play around with, but they're pretty expensive and not custom enough for my intended use case.

Because I'm used to it. I've been working from home and socially isolated for years, lol.

Another factor to consider is that many people move to a big city for work and higher earnings.

There will probably be some shift back, but I think after all this remote work will be a more permanent option for a lot of roles.

If you're able to get the same higher salary, but remotely somewhere with a more affordable cost of living, and aren't in that area specifically for in-person amenities, why wouldn't you?

I was on the fence and about to cancel, since it's the media subscription service I pay the most for and get the least use out of. This makes the decision easier...

Totally worth it if you use it on a regular basis imo. I watch/listen to enough content that the time savings is worth it to me. With premium you can do audio only on the android app as well which I use a lot.

Also apparently even demonetized videos/channels still get paid something when you watch.

It's actually $9.99/mo. (Edit: apparently they increased it and I'm grandfathered in on an older rate)

Do you not value your time? If you watch content on there on a fairly regular basis it'll easily save you 1 hr+ of your time/sanity over the course of the month.

Also some of the money goes to help support the creators of content you consume (apparently even demonetized channels).

I don't understand why more people don't pay for YT premium considering how much content is on there.

You also help support channels and content creators (apparently even if they're demonetized if you have premium).

Or pay $9.99/mo for YouTube premium and actually support the creators of content you consume.