Senior architect, junior engineer. Sounds great, right?
Sounds like a consulting slaughterhouse. Picture Java Enterprise Solutions. As we all know, the pinnacle of software engineering.
HN user
Senior architect, junior engineer. Sounds great, right?
Sounds like a consulting slaughterhouse. Picture Java Enterprise Solutions. As we all know, the pinnacle of software engineering.
I've been using tig, written in C, for ages now, never once crashed. And I'm all for safe languages, but a git TUI isn't really as critical as you imply - if I interpreted the sarcasm correctly.
The new fullscreen UI is really bad. The old one (scrolling) starts to bug out after a while, but it van just be restarted and resumed.
You're right, he said the request is equivalent.
Also, take it easy, it was merely a suggestion. The interesting part was comparing a feature/flag/branch to a fork, to me.
It is! It just happens to be one of the worst languages in the world too.
You should address the point Mitchell made: maintaining a fork is roughly the same as maintaining a feature flag.
IMHO this busywork is (mostly) preferrable, because it meant that any package was truly pure Elm, and you could blindly trust it not to be some wrapper that crashed at runtime.
It's a tradeoff, sure. But this way, Elm didn't become just another "JavaScript with better syntax".
With AI, we can go... somewhere?
What is the reason for thinking "early, not milliseconds" would not mean "early enough for the peeked/victim too?
Ultimately the server must decide when to "pop" players, regardless of client interpolation which can only happen after the pop. So why would the server delay the pop for one player?
I haven't tried it, but Elm might be a really good fit for LLMs, because it forbids taking shortcuts.
Or, you became aware of the agitation and interrupted it. The CO2 was a placebo. You have invested already in the idea, it all clicked in your mind.
[flagged]
"50ft" are 15 meters.
It's not that it has been glossed over, or was a mistake. It's a tradeoff in favor of simplicity (and compiler / tooling speed).
It is difficult to view Go as a serious language because it fails to acknowledge these decisions, repeatedly. You can't really trust the language in that sense.
Why would anyone prefer airline transit over a comfortable private jet?
[flagged]
20 years ago when EU had leverage (the EU stock market was bigger than the US one in 2004
Where did you get that from??
Is this "multiplied productivity" in the room with us right now?
You don't need React for reactive TUIs - at all. I can understand chosing React for web, but for a TUI it sounds like a really poor idea. And in practice we can see that the claude code TUI is also poor.
The point was to stop oil trades of "petro non-dollars", just like Venezuela.
If countries start getting away with selling oil in other currencies, then they wouldn't funnel back all these vasts amounts of dollars into the S&P 500 and the American economy would collapse.
Hank Hill: "Excuse me, are y'all with the cult?"
Jane #2: "We're not a cult. We're an organization that promotes love and—"
Hank Hill: "Yeah, this is it."
It's a perfectly good term for the overall and historical attitude of the go dev team.
It's simply not correct that a judge must always enforce a sentence before any executive action. This is the same everywhere in the world: the executive can take certain preventive or direct action without judiciary. Otherwise just nothing would work, criminals would have it very easy.
You may argue that blocking internet access should always go through judiciary, for some reason. But you can't claim that this was undemocratic, that's just spewing bullshit for the sake of it.
It's not this one thing, it's that yhey consistently do this
You're not meant to gaslight about the evolution of software.
You just can never trust what the go team says.
Do not hyperventilate, ever. Never ever. It's a miracle you survived.
It's wrong, but also: just stop centralizing on cloudflare. It's just a glorified proxy, do you really need it, or are you marking an enterprise compliance checkbox?
There is nothing undemocratic about this.
The law was already there, a minister in Spain does not only propose or vote on laws, but has quite some executive influence. This has always been so and is nothing unusual.
You can't really operate this stuff in a vacuum, otherwise it would take years to take any actions against illegal gambling, way too late.
We need to go back