HN user

thdxr

808 karma

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/thdxr; my proof: https://keybase.io/thdxr/sigs/l4kb7Hf_jl35s_WMc0geyu0H9nOfFY-mv3wLQG9xqVU ]

ZB7NfzWsA6

Posts11
Comments154
View on HN

not too much actionable here. most of the more glaring issues are already fixed in our upcoming v2 if you'd like to try beta: https://x.com/thdxr/status/2075636594640376165

some things mention are outdated - particularly the tool call pruning feature. this has been disabled by default for a while specifically because of complaints like this

when we looked through our data it's not so clear cut that it's net negative https://x.com/thdxr/status/2048268697790300343

also i'm pretty excited about our new system prompt approach - can define each component in a way that avoids busting the cache when they change. eg that midnight issue: https://x.com/thdxr/status/2070721003924103651

providers (anthropic is the first) are supporting this as a native concept

this isn't true

it will use whatever small model there is in your provider

we had a fallback where we provided free small models if your provider did not have one (gpt nano)

some configs fell back to this unexpectedly which upset people so we removed it

the email they found was from a different repo and not monitored. this is ultimately our fault for not having a proper SECURITY.md on our main repository

the issue that was reported was fixed as soon as we heard about it - going through the process of learning about the CVE process, etc now and setting everything up correctly. we get 100s of issues reported to us daily across various mediums and we're figuring out how to manage this

i can't really say much beyond this is my own inexperience showing

hey maintainer here

we've done a poor job handling these security reports, usage has grown rapidly and we're overwhelmed with issues

we're meeting with some people this week to advise us on how to handle this better, get a bug bounty program funded and have some audits done

hey one of the authors here

we're a little over a month into development and have a lot on our roadmap

the cli is client/server model - the TUI is our initial focus but the goal is to build alternative frontends, mobile, web, desktop, etc

we think of our task as building a very good code review tool - you'll see more of that side in the following weeks

can answer any questions here

author here

we're very focused on UX and less so on LLM performance. we use all the same system prompts/config as claude code

that said people do observe better performance because of out of the box LSP support - edit tools return errors and the LLM immediately fixes them

i think the idea that no one wants it is off

even if the models do not get better there is so much demand even just b2b

we have all these problems we can fix but we are totally limited by availability

cloud providers are overwhelmed by the demand - you can see this in how stingy they are with rate limits and how they don't even talk to you unless you've already spent a lot with them

thanks for writing this up! i have been looking at switching to PASETO instead of jwt

one thing though - the reason we use asymmetric encryption is to allow other clients to validate tokens without calling a central server

eg if you use AWS API Gateway they specifically have jwt authorization support where you can point them to a jwks url and it will validate requests

i need to look into the algorithm again - another constraint was trying to work across everywhere JS runs and i need to check if a better algorithm can be used that still works everywhere

all of the data in there will be exposed via an API and also directly queryable since it's in your infra

but the idea here is openauth does not handle things like user storage - it just gives you callbacks to store the data in whatever database you're using

precisely because of what you're talking about - eventually you need access to it

that's creating the raw ecs cluster

these components have

1. adding services that can auto scale

2. specifying load balancing config

3. automatic service discovery registration

4. network tunnel to access vpc resources from your machine

5. typesafe resource linking to access your resources in your application code

6. dev mode which brings up your system locally in a single multiplexed terminal UI

not pitching - just listing out why we bother doing anything. pulumi is great and if you want a more low level experience you should use it

can you share more about what DX is missing?

v3 i think has parity with v2 minus wide support for non-js runtimes