HN user

tesla

38 karma
Posts3
Comments5
View on HN

It is rather surreal to see myself quoted. Especially something I wrote on my blog that I didn't think anybody actually reads.

Allow me to provide some context [1] for the quote. Shortly after the language was released, somebody was ranting [2] about how Go was not innovative at all in comparison to other modern languages. I was not suggesting that programming research is useless and that we should ignore several decades of progress. I was, rather, saying that Go was applying those several decades of progress to systems programming to produce a more modern version of C. Here is the whole paragraph that quote was lifted from:

"The point the author fails to see is that Go is not meant to innovate programming theory. It’s meant to innovate programming practice. This is an upgrade to C. It’s a language that applies the innovations of the last thirty years to the systems world, where the state of the art is still portable assembler. So no, the language isn’t introducing brilliant new ideas. It’s taking tested old ideas, and introducing them into a new arena."

[1] http://blog.alieniloquent.com/2009/12/15/newsflash-go-is-exp...

[2] http://monoc.mo.funpic.de/go-rant/

Steal the Code 16 years ago

Another way to phrase this: read other people's code.

Reading code is important. Programmers should read code all the time.

What the author seems to miss is that if you rent for 30 years, you still have to buy or rent a home for year 31. Whereas, if you own your home for 30 years, in year 31 your housing payment is $0 + maintenance, which I'll guarantee is less than the rent the author would be paying.