I think referring to a CEO's termination as 'resignation' is a somewhat diplomatic way of implying that they were actually dismissed from their position.
I recently finished reading "The PayPal Wars". The book recounts an interesting episode regarding PayPal's history where Elon Musk pursued his vision of rebranding PayPal as X.com. Despite his efforts, the initiative was not successful, ultimately leading to his resignation from the CEO position. It remains to be seen whether history has the tendency to repeat these kinds of events.
Apologies for any uncertainty regarding CPU and RAM factors. Initially, my thought was to decouple the cost model from conventional hardware factors from a user's view. However, from the service provider's viewpoint, I have to encompass aspects like CPU consumption, IO usage, and RAM utilization while crafting this cost model to bring mutual benefit.
Utilizing AWS as a foundational reference is indeed a worthwhile approach, something I'll delve into by examining pertinent services.
Thanks, I quickly went through how Aurora performs IO metering. It divides IO into Read operations and Write operations, which seems suitable for OLTP services. However, for analysis purposes, there is also CPU consumption that cannot be ignored. Would it be a good idea to include Calculate operations similar to IO?