tequila_shot

I do not agree. What do you mean by EU focuses on gender studies?

Also, any country should be focused on research irrespective of AI, I do not see how AI is “coming” or how it’s related to this thread.

Done

sending a ping to /dang - is this post expected to be where it is at? @dang

Alright, the post is down now.

This is a very simple integration and the fallback is also pretty straightforward to implement technically. What’s the differentiator? Why would companies use your product?

Yes - the model is REALLY good. I try Claude at work and Deepseek personally and this is the only model that works without trying to actively bankcrypt me.

You no longer need "their coding agent". You can hook up claude code to use Deepseek. Works perfectly.

No idea why this is here. Absolutely zero insights.

Because the redaction was only supposed to protect the victims.

oook, but why?

I guess for a lot of users like myself using Notion ship has sailed. Most of them have moved to Obsidian, with the new database feature of Obsidian, and it being free, I do not see why users would choose Notion over Obsidian.

so, this is not from a developer called zed, but instead a developer called Alberto. This is stated in the first line in the article.

Article is just FUD

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9464596/

We don’t have to look in rats, we do have human studies.

sorry, what disagreement? I didn't find any in the article.

Unless employees in your company are reporting to you in India, your hopes of getting into an EB1 category is close to zero. You need to prove that you've managed EMPLOYEES of your company in multiple countries other than the US.

the BIG 4 I'm referring to are Accenture, McKinsey, BCG and Bain.

This. They are just a rubber stamp on some of the shitty decisions that management makes.

I'm talking about a fresh out of college grad/undergrad.

Managers charge 400-600(mind you 25% on top of this is for travel).

I've been in one of the "Big 4" Consulting firms, and I can vouch for the article. As a "Senior" the Customer is charged 150-160$/hour and on top of that 25% for travel. The work that we did for these customers was lackluster. We used to come in as "experts", get all the technical work done from body shops in India and offshore. I was shocked to see that Customers just keep paying for these expensive services, and have no clue they are getting hoodwinked.

Harbinger of the upcoming FB first quarter results.

This. I mean you tell me that you just only joined a FAANG...I don't know how you've come to the conclusion that "your team has below-average".

Best by Test - Fischer.

They have other suites of products apart from the AMZN.com. - AWS and the shitload of solutions on AWS come to mind. - A lot of internal tools for managing supply chain, financials etc also come to my mind.

The link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-foudil-securitytxt returns 404.

um, I don't follow wsb, but based purely on what you said, you don't back your comments either. So much for taking the high-horse. Chamath at least has the$$ to show for.

+1, I've had a beast of a Lenovo laptop, and though had a great GPU, fans were broken because of which the FPS was capped to <30.

I haven't seen any benchmarks on how other Games perform. DO we know how games like CS GO would perform on Apple Silicon?

OK, I'm wrong about it being yesterday (or) do you've any source that the rule is still active?

I posted the link to rule: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eoDetails?rrid=131148

You can correlate the RIN between the Rule and the PDF: RIN 1205-AC00

Goal of my comment wasn't sympathy; but to get the facts out there that the current changes do nothing but to worsen the situation.(...not solving the H1B crisis)

No. It just means that the contractor should establish themselves with employer-employee relationship before finding work, from the rule PDF:

First, striking “contractor” will avoid potential confusion as the term “contractor” in the definition is misleading. The inclusion of “contractors” in the regulatory language could be read to suggest that contractors should generally qualify under the definition of a “United States employer.” While a contractor is certainly not excluded from qualifying as a “United States employer” for purposes of an H-1B petition, the contractor, like any petitioner, must establish the requisite “employer-employee relationship” with the H-1B beneficiary.