Not maintaining 2 cache technologies is always a winning argument.
HN user
teacpde
There was probably a slack post celebrating how they leveraged LLM to improved efficiency on password resets
that's an amazing read, lots of concrete and convincing challenges; but otoh, technology is evolving at such a fast pace, maybe it is possible for breakthroughs that we couldn't imagine now to become reality sooner than we would have anticipated?
maybe I am a fool, does space-based AI make no sense at all?
then have rest of the day off to enjoy things I like
But that's not what companies expect from you, even if you owns AI. They expect you to output more, and when you do, someone else is probably out of work.
They just sent out email about the scam. I was so annoyed that even after opening the app, the notification icon still persists, wondering if the hack on the notifications exploits some loophole in the Betterment app
I am at the stage of life where I appreciate this wisdom and desire the practice of it, but lack the will power to not get caught up “trying to win the game”. Once a while I get anxious about leveling and compensation, overwhelmed by comparison with peers. For people who had the similar struggles but managed to overcome, what worked for you?
At the same time treating software like an art is probably not very useful. That code is (typically) not written to be looked at, but to make the computer do something useful.
FWIW you can argue the same for woodworking, a chair is typically not made to be looked at but for people to sit on. I tired to think what inherently makes writing software treated less than a craft than woodworking, but couldn’t think of any.
didn't even realize that, have to double check and saw the "read full story" banner
So it only solves a tail problem. I would assume the percentage of subscribers with poor internet is low.
Surely there is a lot of workload is delay-able, but there is equal, if not more, amount of workload that do not have the luxury of waiting. Is it fair to say the serverless platform has no advantage for the latter workload?
I can understand the downvotes, but at the same time it does makes sense, especially given the target is a logician.
If I read the article correctly, Gödel's rationale is pretty much "The world is orderly organized, therefore after life is supposed to exist"?
I must have read it wrong, because I couldn't see the causality at all.
As someone working in tech and following along the progression of AI, I believe I have the right expectation. But still feels surreal seeing myself speaking a foreign language in my own speech style.
This is the most logical explanation I have seen so far. Makes me wonder why Dustin Moskovitz himself wasn't on the board of OpenAI in the first place.
Thank you! I have always thought Sam reminds me some actor, but was never able to make the connection.
Especially the opening scene with flying cars in the back.
The blog post speaks quality, but what's truly great is that the author knows when/why to stop the adventure.
Nothing, I believe this gets the upvotes simply because it is fun.
This one is amazing, even just the fact that someone thought about representing images with binary format of prime number
SQLite is superb choice as a local storage solution, you don't need a transactionality requirement to use it as a KV store.
People choose NoSQL databases primarily for scaling reasons, which is not the problem here.
Teaching doesn't prescribe students to be younger than 18.
It is beautiful and unique, but I have a hard time making the connections between a database and the ancient elements.
It makes sense, but wouldn’t the write be slow? Especially when you have many streaming pipelines.
A lot of times the purpose is more on rate limiting than disallowing bot access. The goal to tell apart is on the premise that humans are a lot slower than bots.
My guess is it is probably cheaper than fully automating the process with machines.
The caption mentions it is indeed cedar.
I guess you could just swap batteries ...
It is 7x the price of Quest 3, which to me means very different product vision, Ferrari vs Nissan different.
With the $3499 price tag, this isn't really something Apple intends to compete with any other VR/AR headsets.