sys32768

^ This person jokes about raping children.

We were just about to go to BitWarden from KeePass.

To be fair, you probably have some views some people think are pretty awful.

An Iraqi security source said they think it was an Iranian boat rigged with explosives.

If Iran does have underwater explosive drones, why would they boast about it and invite attacks upon that weapon and its deployment systems?

My youngest has played Roblox half her life, but is very angry about recent decisions like requiring ID to chat in-game.

Still, if she's anything like other players, she's spent countless hours playing some of the most mindless Roblox games, and we've spent a few $100 on Robux gift cards over the years.

Google: "Don't be evil." Alphabet: "Do the right thing." Anthropic: "Do the thing which seems right to you at the time--at speed."

The Censorship-Industrial Complex is troubling no matter which party benefits.

On the Apple TV interface on my Roku, I can't tell which movie thumbnail I'm on because their UI just slightly enlarges the image which I can't really make out from my couch.

I always wonder who makes these decisions and whether they fancy themselves a designer.

What evidence did you gather to determine that it's true, and have you informed the U.N. about the "concentration camps" mentioned by this site?

Amazon burned $250M just for the rights to produce the goofy and embarrassing "Rings of Power" series. I wonder who was bribed in that deal?

Here's a CNN segment from 2016 about ICE enforcing in Chicago, without the spin we see today, yet essentially the same operations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUXTqyH54ww

Many on the right who had Obama Derangement Syndrome didn't know how well Obama's administration enforced federal immigration law.

Glitch or not, anything that helps get people off TikTok and hopefully off their phones is a good thing.

Some please write a web plugin to use AI to analyze comments so we can filter partisan comments and only read the truly engaging and intelligent comments by more objective people.

I will contribute $$$.

I keep a forum going that's been up since 2007 for hobbyists. I keep it going because of the priceless historical information on it, not the present quality of discussion.

My sense is that people have become less literate, less polite, and less patient.

Again, this is for a simple hobby so there aren't necessarily many intellectuals in this hobby, but 10+ years ago we had many lively, intelligent, long discussions.

What happens is you start getting more and more users who barge in, hijack threads, and do not contribute anything useful.

They can also be abrasive, which spooks the old timers from prior generations who were used to intelligent, polite discussion where they agree to disagree.

Eventually the quality content thins out, and there's a sort of Reddit effect where you get one solid reply for every ten useless ones.

These days I find most of the new users are just looking to find out what their collection is worth.

As those new users fill up screen space with vacuous content, the old timers are fading away either through attrition or illness or death.

On the technical side, you're constantly battling bots because your domain age and reputation is targeted by spammers.

Did you have that discussion about Biden?

I like this idea. Also a split-window view that uses AI to fact-check and de-bias content, or at least point out bias. Perhaps color coded.

I've been pleasantly surprised how well AI does describing bias, no matter the bias, which gives me hope.

How many of his Coffee with Scott Adams broadcasts did you watch before forming the "off the rails" opinion?

I think HN should embrace AI to the point of having an alternative AI-generated title next to the original title, to reduce clickbait and reduce the global rage index.

How was that post hacker news in any way?

Um, no, I cannot imagine that.

Most doctors are just people who had a strong ability to pass tests and finish medical school.

Most of the ones I've worked with aren't passionate about their specialty or their patients, and their neglect and mistakes show it.

Michael Jackson was on their enemies list?

My partner doesn't even have health insurance.

My deductible is $8300, but at least it's 100% coverage once I hit that.

I'm skeptical of some of this guy's stories.

In one interview he says that after being surveilled overseas for a while by an obvious amateur, he told the station chief who then gave him the OK to kill the guy.

Surely they would try evasion, counter-surveillance, or maybe even sending a team to grab the guy off the street to figure out who he is?

He claims the only reason he didn't kill the guy is because for some reason he randomly decided to mention it to a general in the local intelligence service, and then suddenly the tail vanished.

https://youtu.be/BXtDH2IXKY8?t=650

Would you be here pushing the war crime narrative if Hamas had pulled off this operation on the IDF?

Article is a big rant filled with speculation but zero information about what YouTube said to him.

Because it's the Cloud and we're told the cloud is better and more secure.

In truth the company forced our hand by pricing us out of the on-premise solution and will do that again with the other on-premise we use, which is set to sunset in five years or so.

I work for a finance firm and everyone is wondering why we can store reams of client data with SaaS Company X, but not upload a trust document or tax return to AI SaaS Company Y.

My argument is we're in the Wild West with AI and this stuff is being built so fast with so many evolving tools that corners are being cut even when they don't realize it.

This article demonstrates that, but it does sort of beg the question as to why not trust one vs the other when they both promise the same safeguards.

To YouTube's credit, at least the remaining videos aren't vertical.

I remember testing the "breast crawl" in my first child.

I would stick her low on mom's belly and she would crawl and push and climb until she found a breast.