I would prefer a single binary and skill over mcp.
HN user
swoorup
yes exactly, pressing space bars to select them. I referred these selection as marks.
I love jj, but mostly I use jjui.
I would like more uniformity in the way jjui handles commands when you are viewing changes vs when you are viewing files within a single change.
Often I just make my changes and leave it there without `new`, as I am not sure which file should go in a single commit. I just leave it there and I interactively commit later.
For me to use `new` more, I would like the ability to also simply be able to get a tree view of all changes, which contains file which contains file changes, so I could can have marks that span multiple changes and then either `split` or `commit` or `squash` the change, idk if there is a good word for it. Right now I can only mark within a single change, and I lose it once I navigate up.
https://github.com/Swoorup/shadml I got tired of lack of functional features in wgsl.
So making a new language that is a mix of haskell and F# that transpiles to wgsl. It has traits, bitfields, adts, module/imports externs to bind to other wgsl. Was born from a fork called fwgsl.
Very early days though.
not to be that annoying guy, but does anyone have a nix flake for this xD ?
It will. But humans have eyes, observability, metrics will still need graphs or eye-candy for most people. Though the means of communication might be heavily be based on text.
This smells of regulatory capture.
I would like the native web UI when I am being too lazy, and terminal when I am in the zone..
Does anyone have nix flake for this? I am trying out several window managers after yabai. Aerospace is just laggy sometimes, not sure if it is to do with the events I emitted for it to display nice workspaces in sketchybar.
I might try this later.
A C# dev can't complain, because complexity creates job.
Money Incinerator Lang would be fitting name as well.
Nostalgic xD
Same, and it's quite obvious. You will get the same government regardless of who you vote for, its controlled opposition design to cushion some of your grievances but policies are set in stone.
The world has been a sad state of affairs since Covid. People in power need more power for themselves, view the world as a zero sum game, use coercion, deceiving, propaganda to achieve their goals, in this case a territorial expansion. Anyone who opposes the means it's currently being carried out is a anti-.... whatever.
Does this always have to be p2p or does it also allow for client server architecture
Imho there are js libraries which goes through the traditional rendering based shader path to emulate general purpose computations on the GPU, gpu.js for example https://gpu.rocks/#/
Nix is great but the user interface is ugly and cryptic. Debugging dependency issues (what depends on this package of particular hash), installing a particular version of a package is just more trouble than something you would get from the likes of npm or cargo.
Would I use nix for my servers? Yes. Would I also use nix personally to keep my systems in sync? Yes. Will I recommend nix to others? Absolutely not.
Unrelated question, but how was the process of getting backed by ycombinator like?
This feels like a pointless issue. At best perhaps establish a good trust model, than blaming the tooling.
How does garbage collection work here? Are they just set of PySM code?
One can combat it by just choosing discipline, grit, perseverance and stop boxing themselves into angel vs devil kind of thinking. You are either working for self or working for someone else.
Life is rather what you make of it than the society perception of it.
I love reading posts and comments like these, as it gives me better insights and questions what I have been doing wrong as I can relate to this shiny new attachment syndrome very much myself.
I am betting my chips in dioxus. Looks like a very clean project although few critical parts missing.
Surprisingly the cost to develop is fairly accurate, using scc's COCOMO
Estimated Cost to Develop (organic) $1,023,233
Estimated Schedule Effort (organic) 13.87 months
Estimated People Required (organic) 6.55
It makes sense as the group that are most likely to upgrade are using M1 or below, the others will wait for few more generations
Same it was time-wasting interview experience. They seem interested and not interested at the same time. They pinged me for a different role after passing me up for the first role, but didn't get any response later..
It seems more like a problem that should be solved elsewhere? Are there cases where the company forces you to gamble?
How do you draw the line between someone who wants to gamble recreationally and someone who does it because they are addicted without harming the recreational parties?
New to Borg, and backups in general.
Does borg have the ability to split chunks over multiple repository of varying sizes? For example, I might have just 15GB Google Drive Storage, whereas on others I might have 100GB available.
So save people from their own irresponsibility?
A while ago, I had this exact problem and I threw a template together using a combination of age + passage + agenix (nix) solution to automate my secret management solution.
https://github.com/Swoorup/passage-nix-secrets-template
EDIT: This is meant to used in a nix-based deployment setting, and also you don't want to commit the identities file unless you use yubikeys (Something which I forgot to mention in the readme).