HN user
"...installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex"
This is true not just within the Twitter ecosystem, but the entire API/SDK economy. Nice to see Twitter recognize this issue and do something about it.
Kloudless (https://kloudless.com) - SF Bay Area (Berkeley)
Front-End Developer - Full Time
TO APPLY: email work@kloudless.com
Kloudless is hiring! We are a well-funded ($1M+) startup located in Berkeley, helping people work across cloud services easier. We launched earlier in May on the stage of TC Disrupt NYC and have ramped up with 20% growth month-over-month. We're backed by leading Silicon Valley angel investors such as David Sacks of Yammer and Tim Draper from DFJ.
With our latest round of funding, we are looking for a passionate and experienced Front-End Developer to lead our client-facing application development.
YOU
- A solid foundation in software development, with strong competencies in data structures, algorithms and software design patterns.
- Passionate about elegant solutions. Non-DRY, spaghetti code and the like should trigger panic attacks.
- Excellent JavaScript knowledge and experience with client side MVC frameworks such as Backbone.js, Underscore.js, Ember, Knockout or Angular
- Excellent knowledge of current web standards: HTML5, CSS3, and responsive design.
- Experience working with preprocessors (CoffeeScript, Sass, Less or Compass).
- Experience with a dynamic deployment process (git version control, code reviews, bash scripts).
- Experience building and shipping code to production countless times.
- A good eye for design... no need to be a graphic designer, but need to know what a good UI looks like, and like to create a great user experience. Any design experience is a plus.
Essential: Drive to contribute at every stage in delivering the best software: brainstorming for roadmap, architecture, implementation, testing, shipment and maintenance.
HOW WE WORK
We operate on the mentality of mutual trust for all of our projects. We have a flat team structure, and we expect everyone’s opinions when making decisions or brainstorming. The dev team has strong experience in web application development, distributed computing, machine learning and systems management. We love open source and have contributed to several projects including our own. Our backend technology consists of Django, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Storm, ElasticSearch, nginx, puppet, plenty of Python, a dash of Ruby and some Java and Lua for flavor.
PERKS
- Macbook, external monitor, whiteboard desk and any other equipment you need
- All the food/drink you could stuff your face with.
- Great location: We’re in the heart of Downtown Berkeley, half a block from BART and there’s a great selection of restaurants nearby as well.
- On-the-Kloud team lunches/dinners.
- Team outings
- Subsidized gym membership
- Covered public transportation cost of traveling to office
- Monthly allowance to spend on cool stuff you want in the office
TO APPLY
Shoot us an email at work@kloudless.com with your resume and/or any relevant links (Github, LinkedIn, Dribbble, personal websites, portfolio, etc.). If you can point us to an application you shipped that we could check out, that would be great!
I guess the AppStore hasn't quite made 99cents seem like nothing. Users still don't want to pay for anything, no matter how small the cost may seem.
Shouldn't most if not all iOS developers already know about jailbreaking/Installous? If your revenue stream is 100% hinging on selling the app (as opposed to in-app purchases or ads), then shouldn't you be cognisant of the piracy issue associated with a jailbroken iOS device and not naive enough to think that every copy of your app will be obtained legally?
I do think it's a shame that companies put a lot into creating a premium app for the AppStore, which gets pirated and downloaded for free. But I don't really see an end to this for the foreseeable future. Apple has already tried to make jailbreaking illegal, but it failed to do so.
$200 million. For the domain!
At the rate the value of that domain was rocketing, seems like a decent investment at the time. Too bad no one's going to want to be associated with it after what team Color did to itself.
Is this idea really worth leaving school for? I know of at least a few competitors in this space, so it seems like a pretty big risk (even with $1M in seed funding) to drop out.
hello@[firstname][lastname].com
Definitely agree that big, popular dating sites won't be quick to pick this up. I do see the possibility of them monitoring the usage of the API and perhaps integrating some 3rd party API's into their sites too.
What the dating API allows you to do is show off not only what you SAY you're doing, but what you're ACTUALLY doing. It adds an additional facet to someone's profile, which only enhances online dating in my opinion. Could be something larger players would want to look into.
The ongoing trend of mobile dating and social apps should benefit from this release.
old habits die hard.
though deep down i agree that this probably means big trouble for a lot of other companies in the photo sharing space, there are some innate differences that could keep other companies afloat (even COLOR!)
one of the big differences i can think of off the top of my head at 3am is that FB still isn't really about discovering new friends. You meet people in real life, then you friend them on Facebook. Not vice versa.
As far as I can tell, something that Color is expanding into is creating this "temporary" social network where you share photos with anybody within a certain location. It isn't as much about sharing photos with friends that you already have, as it is about discovering new people and the photos they're taking around you.
Based on widespread privacy concerns that Facebook has had to deal with, I'd say it's unlikely that this app involves social discovery. It's probably another friend, photo-sharing app, with the permissions of sharing mirroring what happens on the Facebook webapp.
i'm surprised it's taken facebook this long to create something photo specific. photos are one of the top (if not THE top) reason why people use facebook.
giant slayer? or too late?
Amazon already invested $175M in LivingSocial, so isn't this cannibalizing that?
Whiteboard ftw!
uhh, have you seen who works in building 43? do they look like they can win at social?
i kid, i kid :)
maybe Nokia should look into actually running ubuntu on their phones. might save them :P
for full disclosure, i used to work at RIM and it was a great company to work for.
i think this article nails one aspect of RIM's downfalls really well. they're stuck in the past. but the reason why this is the case isn't because their technology is outdated or that they're too stubborn to move forward. they're just slow. really REALLY slow.
even while i was working for the company (in their northern CA office), everything was slow. decision making, development, pushing a product out. for example, take the playbook. it took them over half a year to move the playbook from announcement into the hands of users. with the market for tablets heating up rapidly, that was just way too much time.
another thing that causes this slowdown is RIM's lack of silicon valley presence. they have one small contingency out in redwood shores but that's it. sure, you can argue that RIM is located in the heart of canada's engineering capital, but that's still no silicon valley.
agree. pretty tough to make a universal claim off of a couple stories.
although, i do agree that ivy league education is very VERY overrated, especially for the price tag. although, in some cases the brand may justify the $.
at least in the math department, the US really needs a revamp, especially in elementary school/middle school
in 4th grade, my math education consisted of a year full of "do 100 simple addition problems in 5 minutes". Once you did it in 5 minutes, it became "do 100 simple addition problems in 4 minutes" on the SAME sheet of problems. Then 3 minutes, then 2 minutes. It became an exercise in memorization and pencil dexterity.
i'm pretty sure everyone who did their elementary education in the US had to do this at one point in their lives. but come on! not only did my penmanship degrade from having to write so fast, it was an utter waste of an entire year of my education.
disclaimer: i didn't complain while i was doing it though. they rewarded me with candy :)
only in China would a nickname like "Shanzhai" be acceptable :P
is your demo a functioning demo? or is it a dummy demo purely for demonstration?
the best way to get funding is to put your product in the hands of your users. unless your idea is a out-of-this-world idea, you're likely going to need to show the investors that your product is in high demand on the market and that you've gained some sort of traction already.
don't forget the always growing pile of dominos pizza boxes and seemingly never ending supply of soda
how many transactions have taken place or take place on a daily basis?
it's a really interesting concept and something that i've considered before. basically a reverse auction where the seller bids to sell the item to the buyer. theoretically the lowest bidder wins and sells the item.
from the buy side, this seems like a great idea. don't spend a lot of time perusing craigslist or ebay. just name your price, and hopefully sellers will compete to sell the item to you. however, my gut feeling (and from what i saw from browsing the site for a minute) is that people who post want a deal. they don't want to pay ebay/craigslist market going rates, let alone retail.
which brings me to the sell side, with craigslist and ebay both offering higher going rates, why would a seller want to take a huge hit on what he/she is selling on this site?
basically, you're trying to appease two markets, and i don't (at first glance) see the incentive for the seller to participate, given the success of craigslist and ebay.
also, how do you plan on monetizing?