sumnole

Visual Studio has WinForms, which is pretty RAD.

The UIs are text only, so they are textual. Modern TUIs may support mouse events. That this tool can export to several TUI frameworks is evidence that these UIs are indeed TUIs, even if not the most traditional.

Another to add to the list: Allow flexible naming. For example, drilling the two sum problem requires the user name the hashmap prev_map, but I feel memorizing this sort of stuff detracts from the lesson.

And a banner ad may display on a laptop in your home, what's your point? Location or device type matters not. This ad doesn't interrupt the user or demand any attention.

Ads really aren't that bad. Targeted ads may even help you discover products you'll enjoy.

The ad in the article is pretty obviously an ad to anyone that can read the words, "New Series. Start Watching".

Ads like these that randomly display during idle is hardly what I consider invasive.

Hopefully OP's sister gets her mental health under control, but I wouldn't immediately raise pitch forks to ban an entire industry vital to the economy and business-consumer communication.

I wouldn't worry. Updating .NET rarely breaks anything.

Aside from copying text from images, OneNote can also make text in images searchable.

The average user likely just streams from Spotify. The users collecting mp3s are probably more tolerant to the learning curve.

It helps that the four leaf phenotype can be recessively carried and passed on by normal clovers.

Meaningful and specific parts lists shall be included.

Cases shall be easy to open.

Batteries shall be replaceable.

Special tools are allowed only for darn good reasons.

Profiting by selling expensive special tools is wrong, and not making special tools available is even worse.

Torx is OK; tamperproof is rarely OK.

Components, not entirely subassemblies, shall be replaceable.

Consumables, like fuses and filters, shall be easy to access.

Circuit boards shall be commented.

Power from USB is good; power from proprietary power adapters is bad.

Standard connectors shall have pinouts defined.

If it snaps shut, it shall snap open.

Screws better than glues.

Docs and drivers shall have permalinks and shall reside for all perpetuity at archive.org.

Ease of repair shall be a design ideal, not an afterthought.

Metric or standard, not both.

Schematics shall be included.

Pedantics aside, not much reasoning against quality. Perhaps I've lucked out, but I've worked in many sectors and do not at all agree with sentiment here about DOD software quality. There is significant formal investment/research in DOD to improve operations, including taking the best of practices in commercial. In my experience, the worst of software is written by teams with little experience improvising under Agile and taking on tech debt with no time/resources to get things done the right way.

Well, this is just standard Aerospace grade software

Can't be further from the truth. DOD software is given huge budgets where it's not surprising to see 3 separate teams performing QA for one software milestone. It's one of the few sectors that still plan software upfront waterfall style and implement strict procedures for traceability, change management, etc. Who else is using formal methods or safety critical stacks like ADA/Spark?

Halite is my favorite. I grind it up and put it in everything.

Looking forward to this being finished (especially after reading Little Book of Linear Algebra, which was great).

Matching the controls from the official tetris.com would be a good idea imho.

Which is just not true. Pascal is going strong within the Lazarus / RAD community.

Think inets as like sort of lambda calculus runtime: lambdas -> inets -> reduced inets -> lambdas

a bit like Tree Calculus but with nets.

You need to both have existing midi devices and allow browser access.

Don't discount Bulma because of this though. It's quite a joy to use.

Does anyone have suggestions for math textbooks that follow these writing rules?

Offload tabs to OneTab when the amount is overwhelming.

Huggingface community

I want to get fit Hit up the gym

I want to read more Hit up a place of books

I want to develop skills Choose books that skill you up

I want to build relationships Consistently reach out to people

I want to be an entrepreneur You're in good company.

It feels like I just wasn't given the playbook, and worse, am incapable of piecing one together. Have any of you dealt with this? Any advice? Are there coaches that can help? You're capable. Don't tell yourself you're not. Go and form a plan for yourself, you know yourself best and you don't need anyone else. Be confident.

One of my favorite circular data viz plots is the polar diagram. It's a simple plot but leads to some pretty aesthetic and easy to read results.

I've replaced Adobe with Affinity and am mostly satisfied, although in the latest versions I've been experiencing bugs with the renderer (eg artifact lines or the canvas being cut off by one pixel) which introduces some difficulties.

H cycles ROYGBIV from 0 to 360 degrees, normalized 0 to 255.

S controls saturation and V controls brightness.

I switched a long time ago. I use Affinity Photo and Corel PaintShop Pro. Only features I feel I'm missing out on are the generative ai features in latest Photoshop versions.

By an air conditioning unit.

It pales in comparison but it's still the best free option besides Fusion 360, which I'd recommend if you don't mind the limitations of the personal license.

Fortunately, all input handling techniques can be reduced to relatively few concepts.