the article isn't saying you should be scared of chinese models
HN user
subsistence234
nothing can be done
are you sure you don't just hate the victims of all that crime?
aside from the huge domestic market (or potential in the future), china has built incredibly efficient infrastructure for manufacturing prototyping/production.
but it's also thanks to protectionism, and their strictly controlled (not freely traded) cheap currency.
if china had to play by the same rules as japan or germany it would not be quite as successful. but the west walked into this trap, hoping their win-win proposal would be satisfactory for all. now the west is too dependent on chinese production to enforce equal standing.
of course the US has its own unfair advantages, e.g. the global reserve currency and the massive post-WWII headstart.
a stranger is asking you to risk $100k on his half-baked plan in exchange for nothing, and you say "sure go ahead take my money!"? no. it doesn't work like that in the islamic world.
as a borrower who's not allowed to compensate for your lenders' risk monetarily, your access to loans is severely restricted. Essentially you have to rely on your extended family. and instead of paying for the risk with interest payments, you have to pay with loyalty and subservience.
it restricts social mobility far more than the western model. it incentivizes clan structures. which incentivize cousin marriage.
power concentrates in the patriarchs of a million little family kingdoms. which causes all kinds of economic inefficiencies.
in the US, even if you're born without any family connections, as a healthy 20 year old you can find a job (hard work) that allows you to save $70k per year and invest it. when you're 30 you have $1M and a good credit history, you can easily leverage that to get a $2M loan at low interest rates, which allows you to start any kind of productive venture you want.
and you can do all this without owing your clan's patriarch access to e.g. your most profitable clients, or your daughters hand in marriage to his retarded son, or anything else he wants in exchange for his generosity.
The regime spent the past 50 years teaching everyone that their nation is just a source of shame and at best just a meaningless social construct, and that their culture and people's history is trash, that really nothing about it is worth saving.
And now the regime wants them to voluntarily sacrifice their lives for it.
Really exposes the current state of journalism in Germany and more broadly Europe: just propaganda and gossip.
A functioning "fourth estate" would have reported on this *before* the law was passed.
This isn't X \emdash it's Y!
On top of analyzing vast amounts of surveillance data, AI also has to write HN comments defending the mass surveillance! Busy life.
it's crypto-fascist misogynoir!
yeah it may not be helpful, but at least it's starting a conversation. most people aren't even aware yet, and there's no way to raise awareness without a vacation. for example none of our web designers knows how to put a message on the website without shutting it down. and none of our managers knows how to shut down a website without taking a vacation.
sounds like it's a religious ceremony to you. the purpose of the strike is to increase pressure on the government, you're demanding actions that decrease that pressure, apparently for piety reasons.
you're at least 10 years too late with that idea
what do you think changed culturally around 2014 (I'd say it started a little earlier, maybe 2011)?
Because the German law only harms Germans, whereas the Italian law in question demands global bans.
what in the marvel slop redditor fantasy is this?
There's no accountability or due process. According to this brilliant law, if some crony with write-privilege adds your website to a list, the whole world has to ban your website within 30 minutes no questions asked.
Really?
A group of people who were elected by nobody, should, without any accountability or due process, be able to ban any website they don't like from the internet? And not just for Italians but globally?
Even if you think this is a great thing for Italians (I have no idea why anyone would think that), you expect the whole world to surrender to this absurd demand? Categorical imperative???
where is the mythical land of people that prefer gamey metallic beef?
he is accused of targeted harassment
yeah but that's an accusation without basis in reality.
Is there really a dearth of maintainers for the originals? They already work fine, no? To me it sounds a bit like: "Addition has become stagnant, so we need to re-implement it in higher category theory. Sure, 99% of even research mathematicians don't benefit from that re-implementation. But no risk no reward! If vocal traditionalists refuse to contribute to reinventing the wheel, maybe they're working on something that hasn't been refined/stagnated decades ago, but I won't take their perspective (that addition already works fine) seriously, unless they start re-implementing addition as well."
non-LTS release means beta now?
the result of this licensing: in the future there's gonna be a shitty free linux variant, and a SaaS premium variant. of course for complete distros this has always been the case, but now we'll get it for the core components.
With only 5% down there is no safety buffer. Lenders and insurers will take advantage of your precarious situation.
nobody is falling for this nonsense anymore.
Ethnic Brits are the people whose majority of ancestors two centuries ago were living on the British Isles.
But I was talking about Brits in a wider sense -- the people with British passports and voting rights at the time when those mass migration laws were passed. Which happened against their consent.
I was completely wrong about the cost. XMR mining rewards amount to only $150k/day.
At the height of the attack, Qubic (the company) paid people up to $3 in QUBIC for every $1 of XMR they mined through QUBIC, and they achieved around 33% of XMR's hashrate which was sufficient to mine the majority of blocks for a few hours.
If they were forced to buy back all those QUBICs they paid out, this might have cost them ~$100k/day. But thanks to the media attention it's likely that they didn't need to buy anything back and actually were able to emit more than they otherwise could have.
XMR needs to adapt -- switch to PoS, or ASICs-based POW, or a hybrid of both.
I was completely wrong about the cost. XMR mining rewards amount to only $150k/day.
At the height of the attack, Qubic (the company) paid people up to $3 in QUBIC for every $1 of XMR they mined through QUBIC, and they achieved around 33% of XMR's hashrate which was sufficient to mine the majority of blocks for a few hours.
If they were forced to buy back all those QUBICs they paid out, this might have cost them ~$100k/day. But thanks to the media attention it's likely that they didn't need to buy anything back and actually were able to emit more than they otherwise could have.
XMR needs to adapt -- switch to PoS, or ASICs-based POW, or a hybrid of both.
the majority of brits did not consent, and it's not even close.
not the majority. not even close.
Don't most people start with a way smaller deposit? Like 5% is common these days.
5% down is insane. predatory lending IMHO.
hardly the migrants fault
Of course not, but it's the fault of whoever lobbied for and passed those laws.
we are inviting them.
Who is this "we"? It's not the British people.