HN user

subliminalzen

45 karma

. My latest project is Critical Stimulus: http://criticalstimulus.com

Posts3
Comments40
View on HN

The issue isn't so much about which marketing channel works best (i.e. traditional vs digital) but about the psychological levers of persuassion. People don't like "conversing" and "engaging" with brands. That's why social media doesn't work. Social media is supposed to be social and not commercial.

As the article said, it's low cognitive involvement that works best, not brand loyalty. That's why advertisers are using the Low Attention Processing Model.[1] With this particular advertising strategy, brand information is 'acquired' at low and even zero attention levels using implicit learning.[2] Implicit learning cannot analyse or re-interpret anything. The information goes directly to the subconscious mind.

If so, then we are silently influenced by ambient images and messages around us. Advertisers could be affecting our decision making and even outlook on life in ways we can't perceive. This has been the driving inspiration for these posters I designed: http://subliminalzen.com.

Essentially, if anyone is going to advertise to my subconscious mind, it's going to be me. And I'd rather acquire positive habits and character traits than an emotional connection to a product.

[1] http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPag...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_learning

It's not just psychological research that is deeply flawed. Only a quarter of scientific drug research is successfully reproduced as well.[1]

Carl Jung claimed one of the chief factors responsible for mass brainwashing is scientific rationality.[2] Society worships the Goddess of Reason while frowning down on "irrational" and non-verifiable religious testimony.

Now that science is proven to be systemically corrupt, what will "rational" people base their understanding on?

Aside: I designed a personality test / psychoanalytical tool that was inspired by Carl Jung. It's called Critical Stimulus and it can be found at https://www.thegamecrafter.com/games/critical-stimulus. The printable version can be downloaded at gumroad: https://gumroad.com/l/criticalstimulus

.

[1] http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-t...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_in_Jungian_psychology

If multiple software companies have successfully trademarked the exact same single word, does that matter or not? (They're all sharing it already.)

Yes. As someone who owns a trademark, I can tell you it does matter. Pick a new name.

I would guess that all of these matter by degree, and potential trouble only depends on an adversary's willingness to litigate, but am hoping for some help or guidance in what is a complicated (and frustrating) aspect of our business.

Trademark owners must defend their trademarks against infringement. Expect litigation, every time.

By using the exonerative voice, a liar avoids committing to a particular narrative. They can easily back away from a statement by saying "I only said baggage is subject to being searched. I didn't say they were searched."

That said, I don't think the exonerated voice is a particularly skillful one. A careful listener can easily pick up on that.

Advertisers use what is known as the Low Attention Processing Model.[1] With this particular advertising strategy, brand information, and even an emotional attachment to a brand, can be 'acquired' at low and even zero attention levels using implicit learning.[2] Implicit learning cannot analyse or re-interpret anything. The information goes directly to the subconscious mind.

Depending on the message, this can be positive or detrimental to our well-being, and it puts into question how much free-agency we are really exercising in our lives. The fact we are silently influenced by ambient images and messages around us was the inspiration for these posters I designed: http://zenpusher.com

Basically, if anyone is going to advertise to my subconscious mind, it's going to be me. And I'd rather acquire positive habits and character traits than an emotional connection to a product.

[1] http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPag...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_learning

I recently subscribed to Kindle Unlimited and it has definitely saved me money. And with the selection getting better and better, I envision this "Spotify for ebooks" business model as the new normal.

I own a Kobo too and hope Chapters / Indigo offers the same service.

Think about it, this is a country of 1.3 billion people. How often does this actually happen?

In the Slate Plus special feature section, the author of the article shared statistics on how frequently traffic accidents result in death in China, compared with the United States. In 2013 in the US there were 32,719 deaths, compared to over two million injuries in traffic accidents. That means that, in the United States, there are 70 injuries per every traffic death. According to China's Xinhua News Agency, the ratio of traffic injuries to deaths in China is four to one.

The article reminds me of this quote from Carl Jung: "Nature must not win the game, but she cannot lose."

[dead] 11 years ago

Personally, I'd tell Notch to look outside himself and observe suffering in the world. There is so much good he can do. So much opportunity. He doesn't have time to wallow in depression. People, animals, the environment could use his help and his resources.

What a shame if he squanders this opportunity.